Steve Kirsch's newsletter29 May 2023
Summary
22 May 2023 I offered $2,500 prize anyone who gives me names more than 5 amishes in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania (which is the largest on a single Amish community with more than 45,000 people) who died on COVID.
No 1 could have done that. I have respective names, but no 1 was able to name anyone under 50 who was suspected of dying due to COVID. The best thing anyone could do was find 5 names, aged 52 and older, mostly very old people.
In another words, the Amish have done nothing to prevent themselves from getting COVID: no blockades, no vaccinations, no masks, no social distance, no warrants, no school closures, literally nothing.. If they got sick, they utilized ivermectin and another methods that were not recommended by the CDC or FDA. At least 90% of the Amish have been infected by COVID5 Amish could have died due to COVID.
This means that their overall mortality rate due to COVID (IFR) infections for all age groups is 0.011%, a for people under 50 years of age their IFR is 0%. For >60 their IFR = 0.044 %, or 23 times little than in the surrounding community.
The United States <60 IFR is 0.09% and <70 IFR is 0.18% of the Article Ioannidis .
My offer has almost 500,000 views, but there are no winners
Math
Suppose the Amish population in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania has 22% of those aged 60 or over (I utilized this source; it could be a better source).
With 45,000 Amish, this means about 10,000 over the age of 60 and 35,000 under the age of 60.
Over 90% of the Amish have been infected, so we have:
The IFR for <60 years was 1 in 31 500 infected = 0.003%.
The IFR for people <70 years of age was 3 out of 34 355 = 0.009%.
The IFR for individuals >60 was 4 out of 9000 = 0.044 %.
Now compare with statistics in the remainder of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. We will even give them the benefit of the doubt, limiting the timescale to 17 March 2021. To give them further benefits of doubt, we presume that 100% of 545,000 inhabitants has been infected.
Sole Article He says yes.:
COVID-19 was devastating to seniors in Pennsylvania, with 9 out of 10 fatalities among people aged 60 and older. In Lancaster County, 96% of COVID-19 deaths at 17 March – 926 out of 968 – are people aged 60 or older.
So IFR for people under 60 would be 968-926 = 42 deaths.
Suppose 90% of Lancaster region were infected and 80% were little than 60 years old. This will give this group the lowest IFR, comparable to Amish. Then we'll give them the benefit of the doubt. Thus, 500,000 non-Amish, 400,000 under the age of 60, 90% infected are 360,000, and 42 deaths under the age of 360 000 under the age of 60 = 0.011%. So the mortality rate was about 4 times higher, but the numbers among the Amish are besides tiny to compare accurately.
For people over the age of 60, we can calculate a more precise IFR.
926 of 100,000 non-Amishes, of which 90% are infected, gives IFR for > 60 of 926/90 000 = 1%, which is not unexpected, given that Article Ioannidis showed 0.506 % at the age of 60–69. So by adding people over the age of 69, we would anticipate a higher IFR, which we have here.
However, a major problem is, of course, the IFR for the age of over 60:
Amish children over 60 years of age were IFR 23 times lower than others in the same county.
In short, the Amish died at a 23-fold lower rate, despite the fact that they did not vaccinate, masked, kept no social distance, did not close and avoided western medical care in the treatment of COVID.
What makes the Amish case so amazing is the fact that no 1 can challenge it due to the fact that no 1 can find the names of more than 5 Amish in Lancaster, Pennsylvania who died on COVID
Typically, wellness authorities can completely hide actual statistic on the number of unvaccinated persons and those who have died of COVID. No 1 would always know. But with the Amish, there's no way to hide it. Everything is in public so everyone can see.
The community of unvaccinated Amishes is large adequate to have adequate to compare and at the same time tiny adequate that there is no area to hide death. They are “Golden-haired” (Goldilocks) in the fight against COVID: not besides small, not besides large, but in the right size. You can easy verify deaths. And since practically everyone was infected at the beginning of the pandemic, erstwhile people died from this characteristic respiratory illness “creasingly harder to breathe”, deaths due to COVID were recognized by everyone.
So there's no way to attack it.
Neither can anyone claim that the Amish have a protective gene that protects them from COVID-19. 90% have been infected. The Department of defence has been investigating the Amish for over 50 years. If there was any protective gene, they'd have found it by now.
Lack of transparency at evidence level in the databases of wellness authorities worldwide should tell you everything you request to know
The Amish have done nothing but supply us with statistic that can be publically verified.
On the another hand, the U.S. wellness authorities in each state and country deliberately kept records of post-vaccinal deaths from the public, providing only summary data.
It is not possible to get related death evidence data at vaccine level from any state or national government anywhere in the world: everyone refuses to submit them. No exceptions.
I talked to 1 of my state senators about sponsoring specified a bill for over an hour, and he just said he would "think about it."
After I asked our state epidemiologist Erica Pan if she believed in the transparency of public wellness data, from that minute on, she stopped responding to my emails.
Neither will any of us let anyone to access the files. It's just that nobody can see the data and find out the truth. And they anticipate us all to trust them.
Sometimes I'm fortunate and I get leaking data into my mailbox. These. The fewer data I managed to get from public wellness records showed that COVID vaccines kill people. The death curve was to fall after vaccination, not grow.
The Israeli government found a akin result: no COVID deaths under 50 for non-concurrent diseases
Check this article: New Israeli Data: No known Covid deaths in healthy subjects under 50.
The unvaccinated Amish did not have deaths under 50 regardless of their wellness status!
You think I'm wrong?
Just print a link to your Substack or blog with IFR data and calculations. I truly can't wait to read David Gorski's blogs, Susan Oliver, Dorit Reiss, Debunk the Funk and others! I foretell that they will all be filled with arguments specified as hand-wagging, which reject data. They never have any evidence to support their arguments. They'll most likely ignore it due to the fact that it's just besides hard to attack, and if they respond, there won't be any math in their answers, just quite a few hot air.
You want to test me?
If you are a fact verificationr who works for mainstream media, this is the biggest communicative of a decade about how Everything they told us to do was unnecessary and made things worse..
Just call me on my cell. It's easy to find my number. We can have a good discussion, which we'll both record.
Summary
With the Amish, we now know that the full consequence to the pandemic was a disaster. In total, the measures have increased COVID deaths 23 times. You never had to turn the country upside down to respond to COVID.
Not only all mitigating agents (vaccines, masks, closures, social distance, infirmary treatment programs with remdesivir, school closures, school masks, forced vaccinations...) were unnecessary, but these "mitigating" measures recommended by the CDC caused the number of deaths to be 23 times higher than it's always had to be.
The past of the Amish is simply a very convincing proof that no 1 is able to “explain” (to neutralize) with evidence supporting their “explaination”.
The individual verifying the facts will avoid checking the facts in this Article. If they're actually checking, they won't call me. I'll be happy to work with them on this case if they call me and talk to me. I'll give you all my sources. Any fact-checker can easy get my number. But they won't due to the fact that they're afraid of the facts.
It would have been much better to usage early treatment erstwhile people got sick as only countermeasure.
Maybe the next time the CDC should perceive seriously to those who disagree with them before making further wellness care recommendations? Their sessions of "public contribution" is simply a joke, they never respond to my emails asking for clarification of any data and blocking my emails.
Will the CDC always admit that it screwed up and should urge early treatment with ivermectin, vitamin D, nasal irrigation iodovidone etc.? most likely not in my life unless Robert F Kennedy Jr is elected president.
So I thought it was crucial for you to know what the public wellness recommendations were, due to the fact that mainstream media, the medical community and your elected representatives in legislature would just never let you do that.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/breaking-the-us-covid-mitigation
Thanks for reading Jacek’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
