The UK government has just revealed that mass labour immigration is seriously weakening the British economy. This news shook the British media. After all, for years the British have been told that the mass influx of economical migrants is strengthening. Unfortunately, this was not actual – rather the opposite. Data from many European Union countries show the same. It is besides clear that mainly immigrants from the mediate East, Asia and Africa are suffering losses. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of economical immigrants arrive in Poland annually. More and more are visitors from countries specified as India, Turkey, Bangladesh or Zimbabwe. Moreover, Polish experts call for further increase in labour immigration to our country.
But how is that possible?
‘Mass immigration of low-income immigrants is simply a financial disaster for BritainIt’s okay. ” So announced 1 of the most popular British newspapers, assessing the results of the latest government report on the state of public finances in the UK. The majority of newspapers in the United Kingdom received akin messages.
But how is that possible? After all, for years mainstream experts have assured that mass imports of inexpensive labour drive the British economy. It drives, it doesn't ruin. For the first time, the government’s analysts have divided economical migrants into high, average and low earners. And abruptly it came to light that low-income immigrants are all losses – and not small. The fact that inexpensive labour is not helping most immigration to Britain.
Money doesn't lie.
Then why the loss? Simple. all low-income immigrant collects more from government money than pays in the form of taxes. Data besides show that this kind of immigrant has been losing the British economy since its first day in the UK. Unfortunately, these costs are expanding rapidly.
Thus, the first 10 years of any low-income immigrant in the United Kingdom cost the British £35,000. This cost is already £150,000, at the time specified an immigrant reaches the age of 66 (retirement age). Yes, immigrants besides age (and collect pensions) – which frequently seems to surprise supporters of mass immigration.
And how much does it cost to keep any immigrant who did not pay adequate in the form of taxes before retiring? Much – namely £387,000 until specified an immigrant reaches 78 and £465,000 at the age of 81. If an immigrant lives to 100, The British will pay to keep it £1.2 million.
It is worth noting that all average individual born in Britain pays £280,000 to the government before retiring at 66. He deposites, does not charge – even considering the money spent by the state on the wellness and education of all native British before he takes up his job.
How to Lose Thousands in Britain
Did this government study truly uncover the real cost of mass immigration? Unfortunately, no. For at least 1 dependent comes to Britain with all average low-income immigrant. Dependents may be the wife, husband, children or partner of an informal relationship. Subsidiaries are frequently non-employed persons who receive state aid.
Unfortunately, the government's bureaucrats have "forgotten" the cost of surviving for dependents in their report. And there are many of these people, given that more dependants come to the UK than those on work visas (the ratio of low-income immigrants to dependents is 1 to 1.45). For example, in 2023, any 122 000 low-income immigrants arrived in the United Kingdom on labour visas. With these immigrants, 185 000 dependants arrived – these people were mostly left out in their report.
What else did the British government hide from its citizens? Thousands of children. In another words, the government study did not take into account the cost of surviving (by the state) for immigrant children – those already born in the UK. Apparently, government bureaucrats think immigrants don't have children. In fact, immigrants not only give birth to children, but frequently give birth to them much more than the indigenous people of Western Europe. Most children women are born from the mediate East, Asia and Africa – which is not insignificant, given that more than 85 percent of low-income immigrants come from India, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Ghana, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Kenya and South Africa.
But that's not all. To hide the real cost of mass immigration, the British Government stopped already print data showing which countries in the UK collect the most welfare benefits. Access to taxation information paid by each national group in the United Kingdom is besides denied. The British Government besides claims that it does not collect information on the nationality and immigration position of prisoners.
Legal immigration – worse than illegal immigration
In 2023, about 30 000 illegal immigrants arrived in Britain – mainly on tiny boats through the English Channel. In the same year the United Kingdom allowed around 1.1 million legal immigrants outside the EU.
I'm afraid only 15 percent of respective million legal immigrants who have arrived in the UK outside the EU in the last 5 years have come to work. And those who work are mostly causing serious losses to the British economy.
Yeah, 30,000 mostly young men entering your country illegally is simply a large problem. But this problem, doubtless, is decreasing compared to the yearly influx of more than 1 million immigrants, who are legally destroying the national economy.
It is not better in the EU countries
Unfortunately, mass immigration is besides a financial disaster for the remainder of Western Europe. Data from Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and Sweden show that these countries lose billions of euros each year due to mass imports of inexpensive labour. another countries of the European Union, no doubt, endure akin losses.
They cost the most immigrants from the mediate East, Africa, Pakistan and Turkey. These immigrants besides origin the most problems with integration – and make comparatively more offences than indigenous Western European citizens. Yes, the mass of immigrants is besides a mass of another problems.
Is it time for Poland?
Poland is expected to start accepting between 200 000 and 500 000 migrant workers per year. These are the recommendations of ZUS and many influential organizations in Poland. ZUS already estimated the needs of the Polish economy for 200 1000 to 360 1000 fresh employees from abroad all year. Others appeal for more. Confederation of Leviathan wants up to 400,000 foreigners each year, while experts from EWL Group they request that even 500 1000 economical immigrants enter Poland year after year.
And how do these experts justify bringing specified large numbers to Poland? It is clear that mass labour immigration is simply a recipe for a strong economy and a healthy social safety system. But how can you be so sure? After all, data from Western Europe clearly show that the mass influx of low-income migrant workers weakens alternatively than strengthens national economies. It is besides known that losses are mainly caused by immigrants from outside the EU.
It is besides not a secret that a large part of yearly labour immigration to Poland is due to come from outside the EU. Of course, many specified immigrants will have low qualifications. So they will gain comparatively small and pay comparatively low taxes. present many sectors of the Polish economy are addicts from a low-skilled workforce from India, the mediate East, Asia and Africa.
So it is worth asking whether dependence on mass labour immigration is truly beneficial for the Polish economy – or is it just for a fistful of entrepreneurs? The benefits of hiring inexpensive labour will be borne by businesses, the cost of keeping low-income immigrants will be borne by Polish taxpayers.
Let us besides not forget that large numbers of alleged refugees can come to Poland soon. They will mostly search financial assistance – not work. Many of these immigrants will come from the mediate East and Africa. They will start coming to Poland at the same time as another European Union countries will start closing their borders. Most of the Germans have already closed.
In fact, Poland already accepts thousands of specified visitors. Data show that in the first half of 2024 the number of asylum applications lodged in Poland was 79 percent. higher than the same period last year. The number of applicants from Syria, Afghanistan, Somalia, Eritrea and Ethiopia is besides increasing rapidly. The Polish government is already preparing the integration centres of foreigners.
But why this name – integration centres? After all, no European country has managed to integrate immigrants from the mediate East or Africa. Unfortunately, the cost of integration failures cannot be calculated on the calculator. due to the fact that how much does peace, national culture or safety cost?
Bruno Topola
