Marcin Bogdan: Will Grzegorz H. decide who will be president of Poland?

The title of the column should be today: will Jacek M. decide who will be president of Poland? But besides this title, by the time I'm done writing, may be out of date. The universal and at the same time presenting the reality of the final days of the election run should be the title of the column:

Will peculiar Services, or will the Russian agent decide who will be president of Poland?

So let us look at the series of events between the I and II circular of elections. The consequence of the first round, comprehensive, all candidates, pointed to the advantage of the conservative-right electorate. Therefore, leftist-liberal forces had to hit Karol Nawrocki's image, undermine his credibility, not so much as a politician, but as a man. The left-wing media ran the news that Karol Nawrocki in 2017 vouched for Grzegorz H., a man of dubious reputation, associated with the social margin and German neo-Nazis. What is this case about? In 2017, Poland's football representation played in Copenhagen with Dani's representation. Even before the match, on the streets around the stadium, Danish police attacked Polish fans. Let's see how these events were reported at the time by Gazeta Wyborcza, and I repeat the Gazeta Wyborcza: “The video published on the net shows how you wear a green “Track” shirt [this is Grzegorz H.] He's walking down the street with his partner. Suddenly, the couple is separated by Danish policemen, and the sopotian is detained. Officers conflict with him, They knock on the ground and beat with sticks. A man lies in a pool of blood, handcuffed“. Karol Nawrocki as a fan of Lechia Gdańsk, but above all due to his function as the public manager of the planet War II Museum, he gave a hand for Grzegorz H. He vouched not for the fan, he vouched for the Pole tortured by the police of a abroad state. Nobody questioned that decision at the time. Picanteria adds the fact that Grzegorz H. was in close private contact with Donald Tuski. He was besides employed as a social counsellor by president Sopot Jacek Karnowski, who said about him: “At first, I was terrified. However, it turned out thatis verbal, intelligent. If he grew up in a different environment, he'd make a career.It’s okay. ” Despite specified intimacy, neither Tusk nor Karnowski then vouched for Grzegorz H. and now they accuse Nawrock that he did what they should have done.

Despite media efforts, the effort to delegate links to Grzegorz H. and thus to the social margin proved ineffective. However, it was decided to proceed this strategy. The chief editor of Onet wrote: “This is 1 of the strangest electoral campaigns in the past of the 3rd Republic. On 1 side we have a man whose views can be liked or not, but about whom we know very, very much, due to the fact that he has been present in politics for decades. On the another side, we have a candidate we know almost nothing about. The function of the media, in a key democracy, in this situation becomes critical". Onet felt that everyone knew that Trzaskowski was, as he spoke of himself, a "assister", he smoked pot, his parent was a secret associate of the SB and a snitch. It has been present in politics for decades. So why repeat it and make it public? Better take care of Nawrock. Take care of effectively, which can be helped by serving authority. prof. Antoni Dudek, who, by virtue of his authority, announced that: "knows specified a number of rumors about a candidate supported by the Law and Justice that if only half of them were confirmed, we would have a quadruple studio." If I were a humble student of prof. Dudek, I would compose that I know so many rumors about him that if only half of them had come true, we would have an affair the planet had never seen. But I'm neither humble nor a student of Mr. Dudek, so I'm just going to ask if his technological research, through which he obtained titles, including a professor, was based on rumors or historical facts? prof. Dudek is from the same generation as me, most likely wearing maglan underwear erstwhile he was a kid. This magic in public consciousness was associated with rumors. Only that I, even as a child, did not spread the stupidity heard in maglu, and the prof. as an adult man makes a magic out of politics, tries to grill the candidate for the Office of the president of Poland.

Antoni Dudek besides announced that “expects another “dead from the closet” of NawrockiIt’s okay. ” And his words, somehow, proved prophetic. prof. Dudek's prophecy has come true, and indeed, in the German portal Onet. It was proclaimed lice and due to the fact that Charles Nawrocki was a sutener, that he benefited from individual else's fornication. While erstwhile claims and innuendos were of a character of undermining trust, the charge of sutnership is criminal. The penal code clearly states:

Article 204.

§ 1. Anyone who, in order to get a property benefit, urges or facilitates prostitution shall be subject to imprisonment from 3 months to 5 years.

To be credible in the eyes of voters published charges, left-wing media reported that there are anonymous witnesses, including 2 police officers (miliciaries?) who confirm the allegations made to Charles Nawrock and are willing to attest before the court. And this is where the creators of the hatred and hatred run went "by 1 bridge besides far." The Code of Criminal Procedure provides:

Article 304.

§ 1. Everyone, having found out that he has committed a criminal offence of his own motion, has a public work to notify the prosecutor or the police. Articles 148a and 156a shall apply mutatis mutandis.

The Code of Criminal Procedure speaks of a "social obligation" alternatively than an absolute obligation, but according to Article 240 of the Criminal Code:

§ 1. Who, having had credible news of ...... the performance of a prohibited act referred to in Article 189 of the imprisonment of a man,Article 198 sexual exploitation of the helplessness or insanity of another person,Article 200 sexual intercourse with a insignificant or having him or her subjected to sexual activity......does not immediately inform the body designated for the prosecution of crimes, is subject to imprisonment until 3 years.

It is clear from the aforementioned provisions of the Criminal Code that if there are persons who knew about Karol Nawrocki's criminal activities involving sutenerity, they had a legal work to study this immediately to the competent body liable for the prosecution of crimes. study immediately, i.e. study erstwhile they witnessed this crime, i.e. respective years ago, not now, in the last week of the election campaign. They did not do so even erstwhile Karol Nawrocki became a presidential candidate, a individual commonly known. Not so much they reported it now, at the end of the campaign, “5 minutes” before the voter silence. While Karol Nawrocki, until the final judgement of the court, is subject to the presumption of innocence, so many people who have only informed of the charges now, admitted themselves to committing the crime. If Poland is simply a state of law, these people, including 2 police officers (miliciaries?), should be arrested immediately, handcuffed together and transported to the pit.

Since the media, in making Charles Nawrock a serious charge of sutnership, relied solely on anonymous persons, making allegations unreliable, Donald Tusk himself stepped in. During a tv interview, he announced that there was a credible witness, a individual commonly known, who under his name is willing to confirm all the charges. This person, as the Prime Minister of the Government personally announced, is Jacek Muranski. Muranski is simply a well-known person, only Tusk, due to the fact that he is not widely known. He's a patocelebrit who was convicted and served 3 years in prison for battery. He besides has many lawsuits about slander. He is simply a derailed man, from the social margin, which can be seen watching videos of his participation. On the question of writer Bogdan Rymanowski, why Donald Tusk trusts specified a man in specified an crucial substance and does not trust himself with peculiar services, which twice under his supervision, Tusk (in 2009 and 2014) verified in item the biography of Karol Nawrocki and granted him without any reservation the right to access classified information, Donald Tusk responded with a disconcerting sincerity: “The test was evidently not very reliable.“. What do these words mean? They mean that either the peculiar services under Donald Tusk's regulation acted unfairly, thus putting the Polish state in large danger, or the management of these services could be bribed and self-sustained. Another explanation of the Prime Minister's words cannot be. Therefore, erstwhile Head of the interior safety Agency Krzysztof Bondaryk and the service supervisor erstwhile Minister Jacek Cichocki They should be arrested immediately, handcuffed and transported to the pit.

Mr. Tusk and Mr. Trzaskowski, you have gone "by 1 bridge besides far". There's no turning back, there's no 3rd way. Or persons who have not immediately notified the crime and persons from peculiar services who have failed to fulfil their statutory obligations shall be immediately, on Friday 30 May, before the voter silence, arrested, which will show in direct transmission all televisions, including TVN and those in liquidation, either It turns out to be a brazen slander and slander on your part. The 3rd road is gone. If on Friday 30 May Poles do not see these people in handcuffs, on Sunday 1 June they will vote for Karol Nawrocki, who will registry with gold in Polish past before taking over the President's Office. And you'll be in a dumpster of history. You will join these unruly figures in over a 1000 years of Polish history, who dared to rise their hand on our Homeland. due to the fact that by utilizing ruthless, dirty methods in the election campaign, you do not fight a counter-candidate, you do not fight another man, you fight Poland. past will not forgive you, Poles will not forgive you, Poland will not forgive you.

Mr Bogdan

-------------------------------------------