The proceeding protocol of Barbara Skrzypek, published by the territory Attorney's Office in Warsaw, raises more and more questions among investigators. The document, which appeared on the D.A.'s website on Tuesday afternoon, has 9 pages, but it lacks a key component that may be applicable to the full investigation. This case becomes peculiarly crucial in the context of the tragic death of Violins who died on March 15, just a fewer days after the hearing.
What's not in the protocol?
During the proceeding conducted by prosecutor Ewa Wrzosek, a recess was ordered. However, as it turns out, this fact has not been recorded in the protocol, which raises doubts from experts. – The kpk regulation states that the content of the protocol is to reflect the course of the process. That's what they teach in college. – commented experienced prosecutors in conversation with “Rzeczpospolita”.
According to 1 of the journal's informants, breaks in interrogations are standard procedure and should be noted. – If you take a break, it should be mentioned. The time of the recess is given, and then the time erstwhile the proceeding was resumed. This is due to the Code of Criminal Procedure and Service Pragmatics He emphasizes. In addition, there is frequently a reason for interruption, e.g. the request for remainder or consultation with a lawyer.
The prosecution's response
In the light of emerging doubts, representatives of the prosecution were asked to comment. – By Friday, Miss Prok. Heath is on vacation. The answer present is impossible – explains Proc. Izabela Dołgan-Szymanska, replacing the spokesperson for the territory lawyer in Warsaw.
Jacek Dubois, representing the interests of 1 of the parties, claims that the interruption took place after about 3 hours of interrogation erstwhile the actual proceeding was completed. At this time, D.A. Wrzosek was to prepare a protocol to read to Barbara Skrzypek. The question of why the interruption was not ordered during the proceeding and only after it was completed, Dubois replies: – It never occurred to anyone that it would end this way..
Consequences of deficiency of information about the break
Lack of information on the interruption in the protocol may be crucial for the investigation. In accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the protocol should accurately reflect the course of procedural proceedings. The omission of specified a peculiar may lead to a question of the reliability of the documentation and possible legal consequences.
Summary
The Barbary Violin proceeding protocol inactive raises quite a few questions. The absence of a key element, which is the information about the break, may affect the further conduct of the investigation. The experts' doubts and the deficiency of a clear answer from the D.A. only increase interest in this case. Will the missing information be completed? Will this affect the final result of the investigation? These questions will be answered in the coming days.
The U.S. destroyed Ukraine to fight Russia, says Carlson16 March 2025
The United States destroyed Ukraine with their quest to war with Russia, said American writer Tucker Carlson, criticizing the U.S. abroad policy course for the “war” with Moscow. He said it.
Ukraine claims that F-16 are incapable to compete with Su-3516 March 2025
F-16 fighters handed over to Ukraine are incapable to compete in the air with Russian Su-35 fighters," admitted Yuri Ignat, spokesperson for Ukrainian Air Force Command. We recommend: Russian
Meloni: Italy will not participate in the possible deployment of troops to Ukraine15 March 2025
Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who took part in the video conference “a coalition of willing” to support Kiev, confirmed that Italy did not intend to participate in the eventual sending of an armed quota to
More here:
The breach in Barbara Violin's interrogation protocol
