Called to the Board
Carp farmers tend to let pike carp - a predator into breeding ponds to stimulate food and refresh the ecosystem. Similarly, editor Henry Martenka, 1 of my favourite editors, forces intellectual readers to exert themselves and praise Him for that. It was He who called me the huntsman to the board. Politicians did the work, polarization is visible at all turn. And that's disgusting to me.
I don't know what happened to having specified a negative opinion in society as hunters. Our adversaries shallow the subject, based solely on 1 argument – killing. It is not actual that we are killing for pleasure, our function in an ecosystem that has been so severely affected is very important. In order to defend this thesis, I will mention very crucial arguments for me, which are not raised in public. Let's start hypothetically – hunters don't hunt from now on. What's going on? Animals begin to reproduce at exponential pace and a certain apocalypse occurs – hungry animals go out to fields due to the fact that there is no food in the forest, they start to destruct crops to the bitterness of farmers. Today, hunting circles sometimes give their full budget to farmers in the form of compensation for damaged crops, due to the fact that we, the tenants of hunting circuits, pay for hunting damage.
Who will then regulate this population? The Army of Territorial Defence? (...) Not everyone knows what the substance of hunting is. It is strictly regulated. The State forests that own the site set us hunters limits of shootings on individual species of animals. They want the unborn tree standing to be as good as possible, hence the very advanced limits of shootings, with which we frequently disagree. You could say don't shoot. And what happens then? We pay advanced fines for failing to make a plan. What if we don't pay the fine? Then they take distant our hunting circuit, due to the fact that they know that there will be others who will have no scruples in killing to meet the limit. The alternate subject is that the Sejm, alternatively of dealing with very crucial matters for all of us, was discussing whether to direct hunters for research. The state cannot effectively destruct those who repeatedly break the law in their roaring machines and kill God’s spirit of guilty people on the roads. 1881 – so many died last year and 4 people died during hunting. These are the facts.
The second very crucial topic, which concerns our nature, is the balance in nature. In the food pyramid, we humans are the top predator. Of course, the wolf, bear and lynx besides origin changes in the herbivores' population, but they do not think about the future and erstwhile they eat everything that moves, they decision on. Bioceneosis becomes dead, as we observe in Bieszczady. The next regulating component in biocenosis is ravenous. In neighbouring countries, they are maintained at a certain level, and we are not allowed to hunt them for a very long time.
It cannot be that there are 3 crow nests on 50 hectares of forest – they must eat something. Therefore, they destruct young animals, beginning with the hare and ending with deer goats. For many environmentalists, this component may not be obvious, but I cordially invitation you to observe in the field, due to the fact that the sight of the raven tearing the goat apart is very moving, these are not pleasant pictures. But that's something to talk about.
For the sake of clarity, I am in favour of diversity in nature, predators with a wolf at the head should be, but in reasonable amounts. They are an integral part of our nature. There are many unresolved things about hunting and nature conservation. That's what we request to talk about, get free of each other's hostile attitudes and sit together at the table to solve these problems. I am talking about hunters, environmentalists and Polish Hunting Union. I frequently live in the forest, observing and enjoying the richness of our nature. For me, the worst situation and, I think, for my fellow environmentalists too, is that the forest becomes increasingly silent and the silent forest is simply a dead forest. John Nikolai Zubek
How many of Isabella's bases?
The alleged wellness service is everyone. She was already present at birth. Well, unless he was born somewhere on the plane, but then – as experience teaches – any doctor on board found himself. Then as a kid, he took vaccines, was weighed, measured, and his wellness balance was compiled. There are those who have not been in contact with wellness care for years during the youthful or even adult life, due to the fact that they were - or at least so they thought - healthy.
However, the older the person, the more likely medical care is. Society, not only ours, is getting older – besides thanks to the advancement of medicine – so there are more and more pending wellness care. That's a simple reason why getting into a doctor is getting harder. Everyone here can callback their own, and especially bad, memories of contact with wellness care. So I'll let myself go, starting with the worst ones. I've been waiting almost 5 years for any specialized research.
When I call the clinic, I'm sent a text saying I'll be notified erstwhile my turn comes. I know that the plague is an unreturned visit, so I'm trying to bet on all appointment. Recently, however, I have had a very bad situation. erstwhile I went to the reception desk of the rehabilitation clinic, a good woman informed me that this was a mistake due to the fact that my visit “is not in the system”. I said that in that case I would find a card on which you wrote this word down yourself to me, then she – equally politely – replied to me to show this card. However, erstwhile I showed you a card after a fewer days of searching, after success, I admitted that she was writing it, she shruged her arms and said that I might have found it somewhere due to the fact that my name is not on it. My hands fell down on the floor, as you say. After all, for God's sake, individual had to be saved for this term, and if not me, individual had jumped in my place. Even making a complaint did nothing...
The formation of the government after the election of 15 October 2023 lasted a long time. besides due to the president, who gave the erstwhile crew another 2 weeks to bargain more, they planted possible stools, they swept the swindles, and they agreed on evidence to the prosecution. It was not a large secret that the most hard hotel to fill was the Ministry of Health. Well, possibly agriculture was considered an area where anything would have been done, and so will tractors on the roads. Mrs. Isabella Leszczyna has taken on an highly hard task of taking on the wellness department. This happened erstwhile her predecessors were just waiting for sentences or waiting for trials. erstwhile I look at this brave female present and compare it to the actions of the predecessors, I bow before the minister (minister, possibly minister?). If everything is not working out with wellness care, then it is more frequently the responsibility of the ladies from the case described by me than the central office and the female who has a ministerial function, who, in my opinion, is truly trying. And since in a minute spring, Polish roses are not yet in the gardens, but they are on the base trees, so on the hands of the Minister, in thanks for the effort put in, I submit a bunch of bases. A large bunch. ELA
Patient 2025
I'm sorry, but I have any complaining to do. I would like to share with the readers of ANGORA the experiences of my stay in the infirmary in Warsaw, where I had a small, planned gynecological procedure.
Day 1 – admission to the hospital: I am received by about 30-year-old young doctor, the process takes place in a cool atmosphere, without a shadow of smile, without a pleasant word, without human gesture. What will his interaction with patients in 20 years? In the O.R. before surgery, you're in the midwife's room, and without a word, you put a thermometer on my forehead, and my good day is not responding. Shaved intimate areas – the second midwife is rather nice, we talk a small and for the first time I don't feel like I'm interrupting and making trouble.
Day 2 – qualification for the procedure: The prof. and his staff are watching me “there” and he says: Yes, we will cut it out. This conversation is over. And I sign on the form that I was informed of the nature of the procedure. Well... The procedure: I don't remember anything, and well – it should be. Post-op room: I am connected to monitors, drips are flying painkillers – until evening. In the evening a light dinner: mysteriously without a fork, that is, a meat and accessories must be applied on a sandwich with a knife or no longer fresh fingers. Back to the usual room: no 1 asks if and how much it hurts, I get a plastic container for night urine collection and a card to compose the results. Whether or not I see a scale in the bathroom after taking a sleeping pill, and I can read the contents of the container, nobody cares.
Day 3: inactive no 1 asks about the well-being, I am going to take a shower, wash off the difficulty of the procedure. There's no gel pad in the shower, so I gotta thin down all time to scope the bottle. Is it an easy day after the surgery? Not really. Roundabout: 20 people from a distance watch the site of the procedure – my intimate places. I hear, "To be discharged today." Breakfast: mysteriously again without a fork, although the neighbors in the hall who had a different diet, happily the fork got. Um... helping myself with my hands – there's no way out. It is not possible to find with anyone the time of discharge so that the husband has a chance to scope the hospital. He'll be out erstwhile the time comes.
Speaking of which, the hospital's staff are utilizing the form of a three-man form mostly and willingly: Does she have research? He comes in here, sits down. Where did this come from? Exemption: The doctor does not let to ask any questions: If something is not in the treatment card, then delight find us and ask us, a photograph of the stitches may be in us, but control is no longer in us, delight to your gynecologist.
I'm leaving: Thank you, goodbye. The above mentioned events are not the end of the world, but these are the small things that make up a image of my experience. At no time did I feel like an actor of events, but at most as an addition to the strategy – the object of events. What reforms do you request to be kinder, put a stupid shelf in the shower, and give the patient a fistful of the most needed information in a friendly, human way? I have no idea... T.K.
The hens are boiling!
Outside the ocean, the largest rooster woke up, shook his wings, shook his golden mane, and the corals became even more colorful. He looked around and stated that his henhouse was besides small, and turned his eyes toward the north, where a considerable henhouse had a cock with a leaf on its tail, and made a proposal to him, or alternatively a request to combine the 2 hens. There'll be 1 large one, and his, a rooster with a leaf, he'll make a governor. The rooster from the north turned his tail to the 1 from the south and did not even crow, only his cocks in the media agreed that they were fine where they were. The untimely chief rooster turned his eyes on the north coast of Africa and decided to make order there – the Palestinian rooster ordered to decision to the sand hens, and if they did not want to, he would send his hawks on them and break all the eggs, and they would rip their feathers.
Sand roosters agreed that they did not have adequate karma to accept the full Palestinian henhouse, but a large zaoceanic rooster did not play diplomacy, he just ordered them to receive them or cut off their supply of corn and there would be a bridge, so the sandpits squeaked thinly and agreed on everything. arrogant of his accomplishments he looked around the planet and saw that specified a small rooster red feathered with a white cross on his back has a large henhouse in the north, and there are fewer hens in it, so he suggested that he would buy this henhouse. The red rooster with the white cross first got upset, he said it was a robbery, and he didn't agree, but after the advice he made a proposition to the large rooster that he didn't agree for sale, but we could do the swings: I'll give you a henhouse in Greenland and you'll give me California, and since California is smaller territorially than Greenland, you should add something, like Nevada, and preferably Hawaii. On this proposal the main rooster crowed terribly and decided to postpone the matter.
Now he was going to bring peace between the feuding hens, due to the fact that erstwhile a white-blue-red rooster attacked a yellow-blue hen and despite 3 years of brewing they were far from agreeing. He called a three-colour rooster and offered any kind of arrangement, not telling the yellow-blue rooster what we're talking about, so this 1 got pissed off and went to the chief rooster to explain the case. The chief occeanist rooster explained to him that he would make peace, but that the areas occupied by individual hens would stay the position quo, and for making peace, the yellow-blue hen would give him all the golden eggs. On second thought, the yellow-blue rooster made it clear that specified a area is where his chickens have eggs before they can bear them.
All European cocks were outraged with 1 voice. And only the white-red cocks old-fashioned hang out to the large cock, and he pretends to take it as a good coin. He knows that white and red cocks all golden eggs spend behind the ocean in exchange for hawks and another featherthrowers. In a large planet henhouse, the future is as dark as a good crime. GENERAL AUTHORITY
Uncle Sam...
The emergence of the reborn Poland and Czechoslovakia after the First planet War was the consequence of the calculation of the Allies: how to permanently weaken the German Empire and Austro-Hungary alternatively than, as it is presented here, as a historical justice. The later consequence of specified treatment of liberated states was Munich, where Chamberlain gave Hitler something that did not belong to him. In turn, in Tehran, Roosevelt's goal was to make a strong east front so as to relieve the West of inevitable human and material losses and guarantee the USSR's participation in the dense battles against Japan. In addition to material assistance, he gave Stalin a place to occupy all east Europe. Stalin in gratitude agreed to divide the war reparations on a scale of 1:1 and this in Potsdam did not change, even though the human losses of east Europe towards the Western Allies were 30:1, material and put in the war effort 5:1.
The main victims of the Second War were Poland, Ukraine and Belarus, but due to the fact that they had nothing to say, they practically received no compensation. Russia, on the another hand, utilized the occupied states for 40 years in carrying out the reparations given to the West. We now have a situation where, in the name of safety and planet peace in 1994, the greats of this planet pressured Ukraine to "voluntarily" abandon 1,600 atomic warheads. Ukraine, aware of what the neighbourhood with Russia meant, wanted to keep it as a warrant of independency and integrity of borders. The West, including the EU, cynically guaranteed that she was safe... As a consequence of global disarmament, among others, Ukraine's level of arms spending in 1991 – 2005 decreased by about $1 trillion a year, which in 30 years gives savings in the order of $30 trillion allocated to an unprecedented increase in the life rate, and this gives a immense reserve for possible support to Ukraine.
Licho's awake. Russia, with about 1.5 million armies and immense weapons potential, at the same time possible securing in the form of atomic blackmail, all fewer years it "slows" its citizens in Chechnya, Georgia and, which was salt in the eye, in Ukraine. As long as Ukraine was free, Belarus' position was besides a thorn in Russia's shoe. In another words, it is at the minute crucial whether Russia can double its war possible and whether the West will wake up and halt Russia from 140 million people during the ongoing "parallel" fight against determined Ukraine (where both sides are already heavy tired), or whether it wants to fight alone in 5 years' time against a population-counting 200 million empire where Ukrainians and Belarusians will be forced into the Russian army...
The NATO, or US, station, utilizing the Ukraine-related confusion, wants to do a deal: Ukraine behind Greenland!, making it clear that the reconstruction of the east European countries a 100 years ago was only a tactical play and these countries can be freely held according to the moment's need. And if, by the way, the EU were to be destroyed, both emperors could shake hands in the mausoleum. Urrra! Analyzing our centuries-old neighbourhood with Ukraine and given the geostrategic situation, we are doomed to close economical and military cooperation. We must yet recognise that Ukrainians are the same nationality as Poles with their past and achievements, not, as represented by Polish greats and Russian propaganda, the collection of old Russians for centuries. For now Ukraine with a failure for all of us is made by Uncle Sam in Uncle Loser and is waiting for real, immediate and comprehensive help. Where is the UN? JERZY SADURSKI
Money, fool, money!
In addition, I send to usage and to caution another naive specified a story: acquisition in the macro hall in Bydgoszcz (as in the attached receipt). Your cashier informs me that purchased paper cups are subject to a "recyclable charge". If you have to, you have to. erstwhile it came to paying – shock. I paid 7.37 gold for 50 pieces of paper disposable cups. The full taste of the acquisition is this "recycle charge" – no less, no more, only additional PLN 12.50. So a simple bill says: 1 cup cost me approx. PLN 0.15, while the "recyclable charge" PLN 0.25, which is its value is almost 83 percent of the paper value of the cup. At the same time, canned beer is not charged with a "recyclable charge", although it is known that more energy is needed to rework the metallic can than to reprocess the waste. At this point, the question is: Who makes money from this business? Yeah, I'm certain it's just the guy who figured out the smart one, due to the fact that I don't think a product like a paper cup always gets into any recycling. Let's not believe in all these fairy tales – it's just about money for smart guys as usual, not about protecting the environment. Greetings. ADAM B.
