Lewicki: In Paris, the West made a collective coming-out

konserwatyzm.pl 1 year ago

What was presented at the beginning of the current Olympics in Paris was a large response, and the reason was that it was struck there and mocked at what is sacred to 2 and a half billion Christians surviving all over the world. The thought of the Last Supper, which the Gospels compose about, is based on the image of Leonardo da Vinci.
For all Christian who takes his religion seriously, not only formally or cyclically, it must have been very painful, as the Vatican envoy expressed at the present Olympics, saying that "the mocking of religion and religion in this way is very shocking" and he himself feels "deeply hurt".

In many average countries, this scandalous performance from Paris has been censored, not only due to the feelings of Christians or Muslims, but besides due to obscene scenes, due to the fact that in all this pathetic event there was no deficiency of presentation, by almost bare actors, and in the presence of children, fragments of their genitals in the form of, for example, testicles.
If the organizers of this show, however, insist on including it as an art, then we gotta come up with a fresh name to specify this direction in art. Some, disgusted with this spectacle, describe it with a contemptible word – shitshaw.
However, in view of the size of the spectacle and the meaning given to it, we should look for more correct terms, which would propose that it is simply a fresh avant-garde kind of art, but already of academic rank. specified a possible name seems to be, for example, genital expressionism. Of course, it should be added here that specified a show can be called art only if the authors and performers of it are those who declare themselves to be members of the LGBT community. Otherwise, it would be average exhibitionism or an insult to morality, and then it would be punished according to the applicable paragraph.
Another possible, and possibly more common approach today, is that erstwhile the feelings of Christians, especially Catholics, are offended, then of course it is art, but if it were negative opinions about LGBTQ+ and gender, then it is treated as “a speech of hatred” and, of course, punished with the highest power.

However, this is not just a question of whether it was a cultural event or not. The large influence of the Parisian show is that this time, and without any exaggeration, it can be said that it has been presented to the full world.
This message is very crucial and, in my view, it is that the West, in any simplification, the EU and the Anglo-Saxon countries, have made a symbolic come-out towards the full world, that is, they have revealed and demonstrated that LGBTQ+ identity and sex ideology are the most crucial issue for the West, which everywhere, in both culture, everyday life and in law establishing political and social governance, is an absolute priority.

I think that from now on no 1 can pretend that the West is now presenting any different rules than those revealed in Paris. Although it was known for a long time that this was the case, it was only now that this was clearly communicated.
However, the shock caused a large and scale of protests and disapproval is amazingly wide. This is besides due to the fact that in the countries of the West, who resent the leadership and management of the full world, there are little than a billion people surviving today, or only about 11% of our world's population. So if you don't look, it's a margin, not a majority.
Why would the West usurp the right to impose most of its principles? All the more so, that in Western countries themselves there is no absolute agreement as to the acceptance of specified a completely transformed image of Western civilization, which was inactive late Christian.

The message from Paris was received as offensive to Jesus Christ, who is most crucial to Christians, but is besides an crucial figure and prophet for Muslims.
In this way, France has challenged 4 billion believers of these religions.
Many bishops and ombudsmen of the episcopals of various countries expressed disapproval (uniquely, the pope himself has not spoken) but besides representatives of many Muslim communities and states, including the Iranian Minister of Culture, who stated: "The presentation of Jesus Christ in Paris was totally offensive and crossed all red lines", while the largest spiritual institution of Muslims in Egypt, Al-Azhar Al-Sharif, warned "from the danger of utilizing global events to bring insults to religion and advance homosexuality and transsexism."
They besides protested many well-known non-religious people, like Elon Musk, who said, “It was an utmost deficiency of respect for Christians.” Even the French leader, who was anticlerical, leftist, Jean-Luc Mélenchon was disgusted: “I did not like mocking the Christian Last Supper. [...] what good is the hazard of hurting believers?’
There are no specified doubts, however, for liberals, in Poland frequently communist provenience, who smoothly transitioned from Marxism to gender, which seems to them to be a natural transformation and "progress".

The large scope of protests caused the organizers to retreat and after 2 days announced that they were apologizing to those who felt offended. Does that do anything? Not at all!
The most crucial thing is that the intentions of the organizers have been discovered and from this point on no 1 should uncertainty what they are doing. The fact that they are now tactically retreating means nothing, for for it is only a substance of failed 1 test, which they will repeat as shortly as they consider it possible.
They apply the old Bolshevik strategy of dividing revolutions into stages, that is to say, determining what changes can be made already in the current state of submission to society, and what inactive needs to be stopped, until they destruct resistance. Lenin called it “the wisdom of the stage”.
For now they apologize and explain themselves, trying to turn the cat around, but according to a well-known French saying – who excuses himself, 1 is accused (qui s’excuse, s’accuse).

Now the masks have fallen and many have found that stories about the “talk of hatred” and “respect of sensitivity” of LGBTQ+ people are hypocrisy, dishonesty and simply an effort to overpower the opponent. Therefore, specified statements are becoming increasingly common: “If you do not respect my views, sensitivity and holiness, then I am not obliged and will not pay attention to your objections regarding this.”
The spread of specified an approach can be specified an unintended, and conflicting with the intentions of the organizers, as a consequence of this provocative show from Paris. Will this be the beginning of a large turn, and will Christians who have been unpunished so far become more responsive? There's quite a few indications that this might happen.

Stanisław Lewicki

Read Entire Article