“Why don’t you become fathers?”
Because the ladies discourage them...
In mention to the article by Mr.Cezary Boryszewski, "Why do you not become fathers?" (ANGORA No. 3) I would like to add an aspect and an explanation that has been omitted or unrecognized. Mr Caesary boldly declared that he would look at the phenomenon from a male position and he had half done so, due to the fact that I agree that "it takes 2 to tango". The flood of pornography, the excessive expectations of women toward men as husbands and fathers, or the specified comfort discourages fatherhood.
Unfortunately, the author has forgotten 2 another crucial reasons why Polish men do not decide on offspring or even marriage. Firstly, the immense cost of purchasing housing, current spending and raising at least 2 children (including the replacement ratio of generations 2.1). A 3-room flat in a tiny town costs respective 100 1000 zlotys, a car and repairs, continuous increases in bills (e.g. electricity), difficulties with a free kindergarten, the hazard of an expiry of the provision of 800+ and dozens of akin phenomena effectively discourage young men from making this life decision.
Even a low-interest credit for 25 years is not a solution, as it is known that the divorce rate reaches 30%, so the hazard of breaking up with the loved 1 is real and large despite the ongoing love. The second reason is the expanding pressure, claimability and negative side of the emancipation of women, especially those of the youngest (21–30 years) towards men who watch on all social media hundreds of entries and videos of influencers telling them how to treat a man, what to anticipate from him, and how not to yield to him. I looked at this content dedicated only to women: I was terrified not only by their stupidity, but besides by the number of sages, affirmative comments. Young women are seeing: “Let him prove all day that he is worthy of you!” “You are emancipated, so do not determine, but decide for yourself how your relation will be”, "You don't gotta ask anything due to the fact that you deserve it, and if he gets pissed off, then this jerk doesn't deserve another date" – hundreds of destructive advice creates the character and attitude of girls who effectively discourage or deter their partner at an early phase of transforming their relation into a serious relationship.
I am not saying that men are blameless, but increasing arrogance and the alleged "self-sufficiency" of women are increasingly revealing the pointlessness of matrimony and offspring. Drama is besides happening in the generation of 40+ women, who, for various reasons, after many years of matrimony (as shortly as children grow up) want to abruptly divorce or formulate cosmic, fresh expectations for the old husband – I have experienced it myself and I see it in most couples I know. Truly fear, and above all, it is simply a waste of time and wellness to look for relationships with specified women, due to the fact that loneliness (and friends) is simply a better alternate for men, and these phenomena are the answer to the article's title question. TOBIAH
Hunting again
I read with interest the list of readers in No. 4. ANGORA, in which the discussion about hunting and hunting as specified is lit up. This hunt for hunters has been going on for a long time and has been protesting people who usually have no contact with chaotic animals, and all their cognition is limited to what they see in natural films. I am not a hunter, but a resident of a village where this chaotic beast practically lives and preys, and I know that if we do not regulate the number of chaotic animals, the crops will eat before harvest. Now the number of boars is that if they run into a potato pot, they'll overdo it so that there's nothing to collect. late I saw a study on our national treasure – the bison.
I don't know if anyone has noticed that these herds are grazing in peasant fields, there are just besides many of them and the forest won't feed them. But of course, if individual offered to shoot down their parts, there would be an uproar to the heavens! If they can't be killed, can they be hunted and sold? I know many countries would love to buy them. Here individual will say, ‘ After all, farmers get compensation. Yes, and from whom – from hunting circles. I will not mention the valuations, due to the fact that it is simply a different story, but I mention curious farmers surviving close any forest. These actions, aimed at protecting animals at all costs, have led the chaotic to walk in cities, and where there is prey, predators, wolves, lynxes will shortly come.
And by the way, I noticed that in many windows in blocks there are various ribbons, strings, etc. I was curious in what they were doing. Well, they're so that swallows don't put on nests due to the fact that they get very dirty, and that's the protection, but their own windows and their own consciences. Let us leave the hunters alone, a selection shot is needed and it is all animals – from wolves beginning – due to the fact that they are beginning to be dangerous, they no longer fear people. GENERAL AUTHORITY
Cultural monument
Recently, an effort to ban hunting as a barbarity that does not correspond to today’s civilized times has intensified. At first glance, where bears do not walk on the streets, and the fridge is full of meat “growing” on the store shelves, obtained from completely dehumanized farms, cultivating hunting or fishing seems anachronism. Indeed, unlike communist times, erstwhile meat was on cards and the anticipation of gaining extra kilograms was an crucial supplement to the menu, present this aspect becomes irrelevant. Why, then, are these respective 100 1000 “primitives” wasting their time, sometimes all of their vacation, and sitting by the water or in the forest, spending large amounts of money to buy fresh hunting equipment that will never turn in the form of acquired “heads” alternatively of taking any “useful” activity?
Since the time erstwhile “each ear was on the weight of gold” and it was not allowed to feed the game in the forest to reduce harm to the farmland, the number of animals has increased 3-, 5-fold (alk from 2 to 35,000 pcs) and is closely monitored, and the planned number of animals to be harvested is determined by the municipality or the forestry sector. Failure to implement the plan by the hunting wheel is punished (a deer – approx. PLN 1,000 per piece) or the right to lease the hunting circuit is taken. It is uncommon for hunters to ask for an increase in the number of animals that have been shot out of the plan. In spite of putting the ambon at the pressure, shooting the game is not easy. The shooting of 2 or 3 animals per year takes many hunters up to 500 hours in the forest, and the game meets in random places and situations, making hunting attractive. Many hunters, despite their efforts, neglect to hunt anything: they have the costs and pleasance of surviving and observing nature. The charge of drinking alcohol on the hunt is just as much a problem as drinking drivers and nothing distinguishes hunters.
The same applies to additional investigation for older hunters due to weapon accidents – they are not distinguished from military or police accidents and usually affects younger people. Poland is 1 of the countries with the smallest number of weapons in the hands of civilians (130 1000 hunters and about 80 1000 short arms), which is simply a number respective times lower than in another countries, which in turn combined with the deficiency of universal military service causes us to become illiterate as a society. fresh years due to ASF and excessive number of wolves (10 times the increase) are hard on hunting, the game is shy and hard to meet, causing many hunters to limit their activity.
In conclusion, I call for those who ask for the "elimination" of hunting to first look at all aspects of it, alternatively than operating in any detail, and draw inadequate conclusions on it. No 1 in the planet has liquidated hunting for a simple reason: the unreduced game increases its population from 30 to 100 percent per year, which in 5 years represents a 4- to 30-fold (wild) population growth. The presently experimentally established number of game stock should fundamentally feed in the forest, any surplus thereof will look for karma in fields and cities, causing harm for which no 1 would be able to pay. I propose that hunting and hunters be regarded as an indispensable relic of the distant past and as a cultural monument that makes certain that the game in the forest is as large as possible with the least possible hunting harm on the fields for which hunters pay themselves. JERZY SADURSKI
Here we go!
We have a run of spitting, lying, names and unbelievably hypocritical, yawning venom like an angry cobra performed, as if otherwise, by literate election specialists. alternatively of factual arguments – nonsense and lies, alternatively of discussion – throwing mud at not only a candidate from KO, but besides the full government with the top enemy Prime Minister Donald Tuski at the head. And what did the Prime Minister do? He dared to win the election! It's unbelievable!
How do you remove who from the trough and endanger to be liable for scamming for billions of gold wasted? specified a flood of hatred is not yet in our beautiful country (it was not sarcasm). What happened in Lębork is no longer a joke, but something much worse, due to the fact that encouraging the crime, as if there were small execution by the harassed criminal of the president of Gdańsk Paul Adamowicz. Of course, the media supporting the right past organization are actively active in this hatred campaign. And the worst, and even disgusting, is the participation in this Satanic cortical supposedly civilian (interesting, who will believe this nonsense?) presidential candidate. The next victim of the unheard hatred was Mr. Jerzy Owsiak.
Why? due to the fact that he did what she could not do for 8 years the supposedly united right – he mobilized the crowds and that without giving "pluses". The sympathetic Lord in red trousers and comic glasses became the most popular man not only in Poland but besides outside our country. And all the followers of a man who has a cat can't stand it. So what? Where the mud, where the crap is, you gotta wrap your bags, you gotta pour your shit! What's he gonna do?
Prime Minister, Mr Jurek, don't let them go! If they pass solid judicial penalties, they may realize that dung and mud are very unhealthy arguments, especially for the pocket. RYSHARD
A fewer reflections
I'm not a fan of the fresh president of the United States, but I admire his preparation to take over the White House. After all, at the time of the election nothing was certain, and polls did not point to Donald Trump's convincing victory. Nevertheless, his pre-election announcements, immediately after the presidency, took shape. Of course, you can discuss the legitimacy of many signed by D. A Trump of decrees, but the most crucial thing was that they had been prepared earlier. A completely different painting was presented by the Polish political scene after the election.
At a time erstwhile the coalition competed in elections with many proposals, and the president gave it time to refine possible solutions, it is hard not to take the impression that the fresh government was totally unprepared (the task was only met by Minister Sienkiewicz, breaking up the sick media agreement). And the next fewer months haven't changed much either. Therefore, without surprise, I will accept the results of the elections waiting for us, which can show that the way in which the European statesman is guided by the state he is promoting will prove little attractive to citizens than the autocratic decisions of the mocked but effective president. J. M.
I'm looking for a hero
In Poland there are over a 100 political parties representing all options, fighting for applause not so much the same as the 1 that could be overlooked. The political scene is divided into the left, the center, the right and the corners of the groups, which are more... than another or less... than that (group). The political side divides us, the social scene, what it will make of our taxes, and solutions to measurement their imagination. However, there is simply a pre-election time, now pre-presidential, in which a fistful of parties put on the front of politicians with a festival of promises of cacanek.
Why do they always want to enter the function of the magpie (the 1 who made the grits) and force them to give something to the voters? The candidates for the seat of the president of the Republic of Poland present their candidacy, striving for originality, independency and affluence and negation of competitors. They have been doing this for years, positioning themselves on the expectations of the public and “playing” under the public. Here's what I'll give you...! And that's me, you know what! I will warrant – as I stand here! I promise I don't know what!
Plus another bullshit, just to talk about their authors. I'm looking for a credible candidate I can trust. I want to hear about what he (she) won't do. That he won't say after the election that he won, due to the fact that elections are not a game! He won't bargain the state's money, he won't turn a blind eye to the dudes' looting money, he won't usage the stool as a private. He will not betray his spouse during public visits, choice his nose at the philharmony, divided his hair into 4 in matters of "pierce" or "paper" weight, turn the Vistula stick into applied memanology, exposure the office to ridicule and mockery – like an asylum den. He will not relativize declared commitments, falandize the laws and Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
He will not pardon a household member, a political organization or a civilian servant. She won't sleep with a porn actress, she won't buy waffles on Krupówki or by the sea. Not the party's program will be the nation's program, not the PRL's habits and patterns will be the choice and cast of the KRS, the TK and the SN. “To (Du...y not making out of himself in direct conversations in non-Polish language with foreigners) the flexible language would say everything that the head would think...” (Juliusz Słowacki) – his head, the acting president. Which candidate will give his word that he will not go into the dictatorial-oligarchy traces of V. Orbán, autocratic J. Kaczyński and leading astray M. Morawiecki or separatist (from the EU) polyxites? It will not be, like the president of Brazil (allowed the demolition of rainforests in the Amazon), allowed a cut in the Białowieża Forest, Augustowska Forest, Borecka Forest, Piska, Niepołomicka Forest, Napiwodzko-Ramucka Forest, Knyszyńska Forest, Nidzicka Forest and 28 others.
Unlike well-known racists, he will not request deportation from the country of the heavenly race. It will not bend its knees with fear of its voters and society and enforce (Article 25(3) of the Polish Constitution) the rule of respect for the autonomy of the state and the Church and their common independence, each in its own field. Would the President, by failing to fulfill at least a fewer promises, resign his office or make a presidential initiative to compose a referendum (Article 125 of the Constitution of the Republic) in a kind of vote of assurance in the mediate of his word of office so that the nation could free the position? I'd like to meet a hero. JANUSH G.
Adrian Zandberg is Poputchik Jarosław Kaczyński!!!
Comrade Vladimir Lenin, undisputed expert and believer realpolitik, defined alleged useful idiots and related so-called. Poputchiki. In short: it was specified political and social activists who, although very far from the ideas and views of Bolsheviks themselves, supported their parallel activity in the global forum objectively the Bolsheviks. However, in pursuing their own selfish goals, not communist ones, they were with the Bolsheviks along the way. That's why it's not a deadline. Poputs. Adrian Zandberg's behaviour fits perfectly into this definition.
It destroys the left, so far loyally participating in the ruling coalition of democratic parties. In a situation of inexhaustible opposition attacks, with its lefty bullshit, it adds fuel to the fire. alternatively of accepting his (Joint Party) bid to form a government in December 2023, he distanced himself and occasionally made political comments worthy of the village's wisest hand, though, I admit, he did so with the face of a large-town academic philosopher.
Now he decided to become president of Poland. It will only make unnecessary confusion and confuse the left-wing electorate (the little politically-made one). On 18 May this year, about 2 percent of voters will vote for him. Similarly, he will most likely do so in 2027 during the parliamentary election (if not held earlier). Then, however, already these Zandberg 2 percent (and specifically his parties Together) can prove to be the weight of gold. "Togethers" will not exceed the electoral threshold and will not be in the Polish Parliament. The votes cast on them will be wasted. In a situation of equal political rivalry, this could bring the triumph of the Jarosław Kaczyński organization and its possible national coalitions. So there's going to be a repeat of the amusement and Adrian Zandberg is going to be a political repeater!
Let us remind that already in 2015 he threw in the parliamentary elections his mediocre 3 cents, his organization g...o achieved, but separately the then-starting left-wing coalition was not included in the parliament either. It lacked virtually a fraction of the percentage, i.e. a tiny pool of left-wing supporters of Zandberg. As a result, the Civic Platform had no 1 to form a coalition with and we had the regulation of the Law and Justice. And individual tell me Adrian Zandberg wasn't in the function at the time. poputchika Jarosław Kaczyński! And now it's starting to be both of them again on the way. The President
