Material from no exaggeration.com:
Our country has been surviving for days on a manhunt for a murderer who killed 2 people and injured the 3rd badly. According to Wprost, there would most likely be more victims...
]]>https://www.wprost.pl/country/12060643/stara-wies-tadeusz-duda-nie-zyje-jeg...]]>
The criminal is dead. It was found yesterday. most likely killed herself utilizing the illegal weapon he killed his victims.
The tragedy that has become fits into the discussion on the legal possession of weapons for defence. Would there be a chance to halt him if any of the victims were besides armed? In the United States crime is gradually falling, especially in states where there is full access to ball guns. The apparent reason: the chance of death in a crime scene where all possible victims can be armed is very high. Apart from madmen, “normal” bandits definitely want to survive, their victims are to be killed. However, erstwhile these victims are ready to defend themselves and have the right means to implement them... Well. The chances of the attacker are decreasing dramatically. Many years ago, a well-known prof. of criminology, politician Gary Kleck proved in his research, with the best form of defence being armed than disarmed.
Unfortunately, in our country, no investigation on this subject is conducted, statistic are obscured and only anti-campaigns are conducted concerning the possession (legal) and ability to usage ball weapons for defence purposes. Reasons are silenced, you can only guess. besides during the event with the aforementioned criminal Tadeusz Duda, many materials were tendentically wrong.
The words “gunfire”, where execution took place in rule (the victims did not respond to the fire of a bullet due to the fact that they did not have it, the definition of “gunfire” refers to the exchange of fire between the parties to the dispute, conflict, assault), carried out by the attacker, who was the only 1 armed, awakens my mixed feelings about the professionalism of writing specified materials.
Also tendentious and false comments that appear under any articles, in which 1 tries to smuggle a sign of equality between legal and illegal weapons, concern me personally. They are afraid mainly due to the default fact of full deficiency of commenting knowledge, in the difference between having legal or illegal weapons.
Illicit weapons (in principle) may have ANY. It is inert until it is used, as in the case of Tadeusz Duda (he was a poacher, and his illegal weapon was self-doing). So I repeat: illegal weapons, as the name suggests, are captured completely outside the law, outside the system. no of us can control the individual who wants to have specified a weapon. Moreover, we are absolutely inaccessible to know about the desire to have specified weapons. Already from the very nature of illegality of this act – whoever wants to catch the law by buying illegal weapons will not inform anyone of specified intention.
Quite the other erstwhile it comes to possession of legal weapons. Here there are respective complex procedures requiring at least non-punishability, or detailed medical examination, by respective doctors (psychologist, psychiatrist, eye doctor, general doctor – everyone must have the appropriate powers).
The indistinguishment of specified apparent differences means that cognition on this subject is very low, even zero. Writing comments like: “Now Poles will kill themselves as much as they can,” under the material about Tadeusz Duda, is pure demagoguery, or – which is much more dangerous: deliberate actions, for example: hostile services (maybe even Russian). Their aim, of course, is to depopularize the possession of bullet weapons for the defence, and thus turn a large part of society back into the ability to usage specified defences, which reduces the defence skills of society on a macro scale. Consequently, it is surely a affirmative origin for a country that wants to attack our country in the future. They will simply have “easier”.
This subject can be further developed on many aspects. any of them I have touched on earlier entries on my blog. I will decision here only 1 thing: the common readiness to defend myself, including myself, family, own place, home, district, city, etc. causes that the estimates that a possible invader must make in the event of a desire to conventionally occupy a given area (without the usage of mass demolition weapons, which is logical erstwhile the usage of specified weapons, for a long time prevents the usage of possibly occupied areas – this method), may lead to a change of decision – a postponement of the time of the attack, or full resignation. If the signal coming from the endangered country is clear and apparent – that the full society is prepared (has the skills and means to defy the attack), and thus the defence of specified territory becomes simply: credible.
Thus, it is clear that the intelligence services of a given country, who want to attack, may be dependent on posting defet comments and actions that origin the depreciation of defence skills.
So that my anxiety is clearly burdened with rational arguments. In the case of the uninformed or misleading society, there may be comments from the estronomy of people who absolutely do not work for abroad services, but who have undergone any kind of "brainwashing" and believe in absurd and unwarranted allegations distributed by applicable and prepared intelligence cells – specialization: misinformation on enemy territory.
It seems that all activities of Polish media, the servant should go in a different direction.
Why isn't that precisely what's happening? It is worth asking yourself that question and trying to find the right answer.
Meanwhile, remember: illegal weapons have or can have any criminal, bandit, associate of the home or abroad mafia. Our law-abiding citizens stay only the legal way.
Let us ask ourselves whether, in the face of what is happening present and is growing, it is not worth following the way of having at least the skill, but not the actual possession of a bullet, which can be useful for the essential defence.
Data from the US on reducing crime statistics:
]]>https://jasher.substack.com/p/crime-is-likely-down-an-enormous]]>
