This body prepared and issued a message in which the Minister of National Education called for "to retreat from the Regulation on the programme basis for wellness education relating to the maturation and sexual wellness of children and young people and to adopt government that is consistent with the applicable standards for the protection of minors". According to 4 of the 5 members of the KRRiT "in accordance with the Regulation, an crucial component of compulsory wellness education ... there will be sexual wellness education. As part of its assumptions, children from grades IV – VI, i.e. between the ages of 9 and 12, can be familiarized with issues specified as erections, autosexual behaviour and the concept of sexual health. specified requirements conflict with the rules on the protection of minors in the media. Their implementation in the primary school programme may in the close future lead to a collapse in the protection strategy for minors in force on tv and the Internet. This apparent mismatch between media law and school requirements will consequence in a gradual erosion of the protection strategy for minors in all its areas: tv and online".
Professor Tadeusz Kowalski did not agree with this opinion and the Council decision.
"The resolution was adopted by 4 votes against. I do not believe that the KRRiT is the competent authority to measure the programme bases. If she had any comments, she could besides make comments in the consultation of the Regulation. The rationale for the resolution is alternatively ideological, especially as the fresh subject which the Ministry of Education intends to introduce into the programming basis is rather extended and includes, among others, intellectual health, hygiene, relations with the environment, a sense of security, cognition of cybersecurity. The subject of sexual life is 1 of the elements of this subject. In no way does the provisions of the programme base straight apply to the Broadcasting and Media Act. The Broadcasting Act contains provisions on the protection of minors with respect to audiovisual transmissions, but this control is simply a follow-up, and a long-term practice shows that broadcasters mostly comply reasonably rigorously with these rules due to the fact that the KRRiT is simply a rule in this respect, and that is adequate in my view" The prof. said.
However, the KRRiT believes otherwise, and this is the aftermath of the eight-year regulation of law and justice. This organization has placed its supporters in many state institutions and is now blocking the appropriate improvement of the state.
