The question mark is due to the fact that the text will be about addressing the matter, or is there something in the planet of politics that we can call determinism?
This time let's start with the final conclusion. If we believe that destiny exists in the land of individual beings, it undoubtedly besides exists at the level of associations and of different our communities. It's just harder to recognize. It seems that everything is mixed in the boiler of history, but in reality the planet is an highly orderly mechanism, moving like a proverbial Swiss watch. All you request to do is decently identify the signs of the time, so that at least in the general outlines of the coming decisions. It is inactive only nature, and it is conditioned, under the alleged laws of nature.
In Africa, they say that erstwhile he wakes up on the gazelle's savannah with the first rays of the sun, he starts to run, reasoning only that to live he must go faster than a lion. At the same time the lion besides gets up. He prides himself only on the fact that in order to live, 1 has to decision faster than a gazelle. It's been like this forever. The same is actual among humans. There is fundamentally only 1 problem between them: at first glance you can't see who is simply a lion and who is simply a gazelle. Doesn't mean it's not there. Discernment in real situations is difficult, even due to the fact that mistakes are very expensive. What happens to the gazelle, awakening in the false belief that it is the most dangerous predator? Also, if he loses his desire to kill and hunt, he will not last long. He will end up dead to vultures. It's almost identical between people and their relationships. So individual individuals, as well as their nations and states, must first of all be well and even perfectly recognized who they are. This is the art of a skilled politician, and consequently the happiness of nations. 1 must only take into account the fact that nations and states in specified turbulent past may change their status. Promote, be degraded. But it's not that important. Let us look at the 1000 years of European history.
Has it changed that much over the years? It's just cosmetics! And erstwhile we apply an even broader perspective, we will see that, for example, full civilizations, actually, are almost immortal. He might even think that mostly everyone knows who they are. And I guess only erstwhile Poles do not know the art of looking – fact in the eyes. inactive any false roles, misconceptions about your status. And then the insufferable groan and the screaming that they hurt! We inactive live in the clutches of our own illusions, morbid ideas. I was reminded of the student times erstwhile Czech students from Brno talked a lot about the size of Poland. They didn't say anything, but someway they looked at us strangely. Oh, their eyes! And it wouldn't mean anything if it wasn't for another repeat of history. For students repeating the enty class once!
Antoni Koniuszewski
Think Poland, No. 29-30 (19-26.07.2026)
