Even a fewer years ago in United Kingdom questioning sex ideology's dogmas threatened social ostracism, occupation failure or public stigmatisation by media guards of advancement with patches like transphobia. present even the British — for years as the European laboratory of the neo-communist moral revolution — are starting to return to a reality in which biology is not a "social construct", but simply a discipline of facts.
No more sex illusion over the Thames. The latest symbol of retreat from the most curiosistic ideology, which is genderism/neolysenkoism is decision the British Committee on Equality and Human Rights (EHRC). According to it, toilets and changing rooms are to be available only to persons of a peculiar biological sex, i.e. men and women. This means that a man ‘identifying himself’ as a female will not be able to usage women's spaces just due to the fact that he wants to.
The EHRC decision is simply a consequence of last year's judgement of the British ultimate Court, which considered that the concept of "gender" in the Equality Act refers to the biological sex alternatively than "gender identity". In another words, chromosomes XX and XY proved more resistant to activism than expected.
It's another blow to the Sodomite lobby and transgender movement in the Islands. Let's add, not the only punch. In fresh months, British sports federations have begun to exclude men claiming to be women from women's competitions and have been restricted from access to female shelters and infirmary wards. Even the Labour organization – the same 1 that has treated sex novice almost as a religion so far – banned the participation of the "transwoman" in its women's organization conference. It can be said that the British establishment has gone from “trans women are women” to reruns of biology lessons from grade 4 primary school.
The full situation is, of course, a gigantic disgrace to the political correct elites and an ideological experimentation that tried to convince the public that biological reality is little crucial than subjective feelings of a mentally distorted individual. It is not without reason that the word “neolysenkoism” appears increasingly in the context of genderism, as its synonym.
Just as the russian pseudo-taught Trofim Lysenko attempted to subdue the biology of communist ideology and to this end negated the existence of genes, so present sex activists attempted to subdue the biology of political correctness, claiming that chromosomes did not matter. The effects were equally absurd: men in women's prisons, sports, locker rooms and shelters, and any opposition to this madness was presented as “a speech of hatred” and “transphobia”. And so it is not bad – for opposition to first baldness, it was sent to the camp.
It is peculiarly ironic that the process of retreating from the sex revolution begins in the UK, a country that exported leftist patterns to the remainder of Europe over the years. Until recently, British media and institutions have argued that questioning "sexual identity" is almost barbaric. Today, the same institutions make rules based on actual biology.
Of course, activists are informing that transgender people feel "exclusible" in this regard. There are accusations of "segregation", "transphobia" and "withdrawal of human rights". But the problem is that more and more average people have ceased to believe in the communicative that women's safety and privacy are to yield to ideological experiments. The reality is that he is simply a violent ideologie verifier.
Perhaps we are observing the beginning of a wider process, and the West slow wakes up from a left-wing dream and recalls that biological facts are not subject to vote, ministerial guidelines, or emotional outbursts of deviants. And although to the left of the political scene it may be a shocking discovery, a man is inactive born a female or a man — no substance how many rainbow brochures they print offices and activists for Soros' shekels.
We besides recommend: Colombians in Poland. Who's paying for this experiment?
