0. The election run is simply a different poetry, but we're done with the campaign.
2. And on abortion, I will answer you directly: I have always been a supporter of the abortion compromise 30 years ago. At the same time - under the provisions of the Constitution, it was hard to imagine another sentence, since specified a motion was made.
1. The motion to the TK in this case was a mistake. On the another hand, the Constitutional Court, based on the Polish constitution, could not issue another judgment.
I can only repeat: filing an application to the TK was a mistake.
These sentences are issues raised by the outgoing and at the same time possible fresh Prime Minister of the Polish government Mateusz Morawiecki during the interview given to the portal interia.pl. In my opinion, these are key opinions in this text, and why? Let's run it 1 by one.
0.
The election run is simply a different poetry, but we're done with the campaign.
Please read that conviction again. Again. PO, PSL, have others just cancelled their election promises, and does that mean anything else? What he allows us to do other poetics? 1 can only guess and guess at the moment, but would a righteous, honest and honest man make a public message of this kind?
1.
Submission to the TK was a mistake.
Let us leave the substance in question for a minute and focus on the procedure itself. So what did it look like?
We had a bill in Poland that had functioned since 1993. In 1997 the constitution changed, hence, at least theoretically, it should be checked whether the laws in force are compatible with it. In the case of this Act, it was only after 20 years, in 2017, erstwhile the Constitutional Court was asked to examine whether this Act was consistent with the Constitution. The motion went unexamined before the end of the Sejm's word of office, so in November 2019 specified a request was re-submitted. This time it took almost a year for the Constitutional Tribunal to conclude that the Act was mostly unconstitutional. What does that mean?
We had a law in Poland 23 years, which was incompatible with the constitution, but inactive functioned and on the basis of it many irreversible decisions were taken, crucial not only for individual citizens, but besides for Poland in general.
23 years we have waited for order to be made on this issue, so that the legal strategy in this respect is consistent, logical and consistent. At this point, all defenders of the regulation of law and the law, regardless of the planet view, should remainder and say only Finally.
What does the Polish Prime Minister say in this situation?
Submission to the TK was a mistake.
In a word, then, Mateusz Morawiecki would like that there should inactive be a law in Poland that is incompatible with the Constitution, and that the correction of this discrepancy is considered an error, due to the fact that the unconstitutional law is more convenient for him due to its content. The Prime Minister of the Government of the Republic of Poland, who should be in charge of the law and order, believes that it was a mistake to halt constantly violating the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
2.
These words of Mateusz Morawiecki in comparison with erstwhile words of Jarosław Kaczyński clearly inform everyone that the PiS organization pro-life is simply not.
But why do I choice on this abortion so much, and I'm not the one?
By choosing people who will regulation Poland, we are actually voting for people that we do not know, which we have not seen in most cases live, which we have never looked into the eyes. We choose them on the basis of their trust that they will not let us down, that they will care for us, and we are mostly incapable to control their actions, due to the fact that many laws are issued in areas that do not concern us or that we simply do not know. Who of us, having a family, a occupation and our own affairs, is able to follow absolutely everything and look at the ruling hands on all issue? So again, we trust opinion leaders, journalists, and yet the words of politicians themselves.
But we must trust on any basis. For me personally, specified a basis is the attitude to the Catholic faith, but not the 1 expressed in words and deeds. individual who has no scruples to agree for convenience to kill unborn children (although only any of them and under certain conditions), is not a individual to be trusted. If execution is acceptable to individual and sometimes justified, then the more he will let theft or another unholy acts for his own convenience and any or another benefits.
Finally, the last point – on the left was a perverse expression Women's hell. It is expected to talk about what it is expected to feel like for women who do not have access to abortion.
Verily I say unto you, All that ye have done unto 1 of my least brethren, You've made me – this is Jesus' Gospel announcement erstwhile he speaks of the Last Judgment. Who is smaller than the unborn child, the little, completely defenseless in the womb, the place that should be the safest place on earth?
And so, abortion is connected to hell, due to the fact that for specified a murder, whoever does not repent and will not regret, after death is threatened with eternal damnation, or hell. Anyone who does this is threatened by hell, who helps, who urges, and who can, does not prevent. No, I'm not a judge, I'm just reminding you of the heavenly tariffmaker and that until we stand before the ultimate Judge, we won't know for certain what the conviction is. Is it worth the risk?
Karolina Stefanowska
