Kaja Paschalska sided with Joanna Jabłczyńska in a dispute over the film

Zdjęcie: Kaja Paschalska stanęła po stronie Joanny Jabłczyńskiej w sporze o film

Kaja Paschalska supported Joanna Jabłczyńska on 5 September in a dispute over the cast's continuation of the movie "Never in Life". During the TVP frame, she said she respected the actor as public honesty. The case concerns the function of Tosi, which was received in the fresh production by Agnieszka Żulewska, and its sides present different versions of the casting scenes.

Short support in the TVP frame

Kaja Paschalska did not join the choir of people teaching Joanna Jabłczyńska. erstwhile asked by Gossip whether public speaking could harm a colleague in the industry, she said briefly: “Asia dared to be a public man, for which I respect her immensely.” That conviction doesn't settle the casting dispute. However, it expresses solidarity with the individual who decided to tell his own version of the events.

In an interview during the TVP frame Paschal did not make an evaluation or attack another participants in the riot. She kept the measure. In a dispute that has grown to the size of a media show in a fewer days, that is the sound of reason.

Two versions of Tosi cast

The hot place was the information that Joanna Jabłczyńska would not return to the function of Tosi, daughter of Judith, in the planned continuation of the popular 2004 film. The actor claimed to have received a script, talked about deadlines and did not know that the gathering was a casting character. yet Agnieszka Żulewska was given the role.

Production and related persons presented a different version. They claimed that there were trial photos involving respective actresses. Katarzyna Grochola announced legal steps in connection with statements concerning the way Żulewska was cast. Description of the dispute published by Good Day TVN confirms that the participants present divergent accounts. There is no reason for any organization to treat media declarations as a valid finding.

Dorota Shelągowska, who powerfully criticized Jabłczyńska, besides joined the discussion and apologized for her words. At this point, the conversation about the casting decision began to turn into public character assessment. It's a mechanics well known for social media. The concrete rapidly disappears, and the viewer receives a series of emotional statements.

Industry dispute and specified decency

The film's cast is an artistic and production decision. Nobody has a right to a function forever. However, it is equally apparent that the way in which decisions are communicated matters. If an actor has been associated with a character for years and has had talks about returning, he deserves clear rules and honest information.

That is why the words of Paschalska hit the heart of the human dimension of this story. She didn't find who was right in all detail. She recalled that a public individual inactive has the right to say that he feels hurt. Freedom of speech does not release work for facts, but professional loyalty cannot mean a work of silence.

For Polish viewers, the quality of native popular culture and respect for the audience, which remembers the first cast, are at stake. The movie can change the actor. The maker can choose another vision. However, he should not anticipate that ambiguities can be obscured by the war on image.

Source: Rumors, Good morning TVN, Virtual Media