When in January of that year the European People's organization (which includes the Civic Platform and the Polish People's Party) demanded the abolition of any of the Green Deal provisions, I was certain it was a play for the public. Quoting a classic, what's incorrect with promise? erstwhile the European People's organization proposed to return to a little restrictive climate policy before 2019 and a paper signed by the European Commission's head Ursula von der Leyen and the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz present saying that the "European Green Deal" policy adopted in 2020 required urgent changes, I wrote that it was little worth than toilet paper. erstwhile in the presidential run Rafał Trzaskowski said that “Green Deal is gone”, I claimed that he was lying like Tusk. And I was right!
The European Commission has now proposed to amend EU climate law by setting the EU climate mark for 2040 to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by 90% compared to 1990 levels. Eurocrats besides mention the alleged "strong support of citizens for EU climate action". This thought means to completely butcher the remains of Polish industry. This is simply a hit on Polish agriculture. And in the end, it is simply a immense robbery of Polish families' money. Of course, in the final, they'll let go and extend the final time. So they can announce themselves to defend their nations. This is all bullshit.
Nobody in their right head believes that the European Union manufacture has a decisive influence on the climate of our planet. Nobody in their right head believes that only a completely detached naïve will believe that the United States, China, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, etc. will follow. We must halt repeating these morons that we are only developing through the European Union, supporting its ideas and complying with Brussels directives.
National countries have their interests. planet corporations have their interests. No 1 seriously believes this fraternity, community, shared future and fetish of travelling without a passport. In my opinion, most of these crazy ideas are the actions of lobbyists of major states and corporations. all conscious individual realizes that the United States, China, India, Russia pays for professionals who weaken the countries of Europe and push into the most absurd solutions.
The leader of the National Democracy Roman Dmowski wrote: “I find it very useful to think from time to time about what I would do if I were an enemy of Poland, if I were uncomfortable to rebuild Poland and if I meant to destruct it. First of all, I would usage all effort and I would not regret any sacrifices to prevent the regulation of common sense in this country, so that the behaviour of Poles does not begin to direct a sober assessment of relations and the location of their country. I would keep in Poland at my expense legions of people whose business would be to spread confusion of concepts, to run the most varied lies, to bring out the most crazy ideas. Whenever I noticed that Poles were beginning to see clearly their position and to get on the road to the repair of relations and to the strengthening of the state, I would immediately do anything to distract them in the another direction, exposure them to any fresh ideas, fresh plans, make a fresh movement in which a healthy thought would drown.” Why should Europe be different? This regulation is absolutely valid here. And it is not even that another countries consider Europe an enemy. It is adequate that they consider her to be a serious competitor or a possible competitor.
In addition to this global game, there is besides a more local game. Serious European states do not respect the European Union as a golden calf to be bowed down. They consider the Union an excellent tool for expanding their influence, wealth and security. They are incapable to compete with China or the United States today, but are able to milk Poland or Romania.
To a large extent, this besides applies to NATO. The pro-war propaganda in the Euro-Atlantic camp aims to milk nations (communities) which are located in the mediate of the continent. The heritage of solidarity and post-solidarity governments is Hispanic contempt for everything in the East. They're not just styrofoams. erstwhile president Aleksander Kwasniewski claims that our safety depends on the endurance of Ukraine. However, it does not explain what this is about. possibly he's mistaken the interests of our nation for his own business. due to the fact that I do not identify the interest of Poland with the interest of Mr.Mykoła Złoczewski. Thanks to Russophobia, present many truly believed that the “Russian” were just waiting to enter Poland and annex Białystok.
That's why the command should be armed, no crucial objection. And this reinforcement is primarily about the fact that the weapons produced in the west are bought for gigantic by countries specified as Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Romania, Finland. The editor-in-chief of “Polish Thought” Jan Engelgard rightly points out: “Americans, curious in pushing each of their weapons for large money, indicate Poland as an example for the dwindling NATO states. In order to justify these horrendous expenditures (about PLN 200 billion a year!) – beats into war tarabans, reveals plans to evacuate works of art in the event of war, with a applicable deficiency of opposition, the Sejm authorises the president to denounce the convention on non-use of anti-personnel mines, plans to build shelters, construction of the Shield East is ongoing". We're putting 5% of GDP in a senseless amok for reinforcement. We buy a immense amount of equipment that we give to Ukraine to a large extent.
War is unlikely. I do not believe that Belarus or the Russian Federation will attack any NATO country. And not just due to the fact that he's in NATO, but they have no interest in it. There are very fewer countries in the planet that make politics without any interest in it. Fear management is effective, this art is perfectly mastered by PO and PiS. Nobody has the courage to shout “The King is naked”. The sheep are frightened their full life by a scary wolf to come out of the woods and eat them. A wolf comes very rarely, sometimes not at all. The lambs are carefully clipped and guarded throughout their lives. yet comes the 1 who threatened and watched to slaughter them. The helper's dog gets scraps.
Prosperity is the consequence of work and fair pay, not subsidies, emigration and regulation. Peace is primarily the consequence of wise global politics and trade agreements, not the amount of tanks purchased, ordered sub-led boats, dangerous banners and strengthening legends. We must direct our country towards the way of natural development, we must reconstruct the primacy of the productive economy over speculative, we must reconstruct moral and social sense of culture, we must preserve the conventional model of family, nation and state. In order to do so, however, 1 must overthrow the belief in the holy 2 – the European Union and NATO.
It does not request immediate exit from the European Union. due to the fact that it's not real. The example of Hungary and Slovakia shows that we can balance and recover at least in any part of what we have lost in the adjustment process. But that is absolutely what must be threatened by Brussels. A wise state would invest in a strong movement Not for the European Union. due to the fact that he could say, "We wanted to, but the barbarians at the gates" ready to lead us out of the EU. So you must consider it and loosen us muzzle and leash." Spain has shown us that this mechanics is real even with NATO. Madrid had the power to say not for 5% of GDP on reinforcements, and the case is postponed for a decade. The European Union is simply a colossus on clay legs. Sooner or later, it'll die. It's worth it to be prepared and as small money as we can get in this surviving corpse.
Łukasz Jastrzębski