What is the point of commenting in the surviving room24 or on the Incorrigible ? What's the benefit?
It's officially about sharing information, but I think it's a smokescreen for more individual motivation.
I mean, what kind of information is it that Donald Tusk, for the 99-999 time, cheated people and produced another scandal?
What's the next large deal?
There are no more scandals here, it's 1 extended for years and the same strategy scandal. This is simply a pathological strategy whose structure is based on mechanisms of pathology production.
A average man relies on 2 methods of inference: induction and deduction. erstwhile we accumulate many facts through induction, we can generalize and make a explanation that will guarantee that we usage the second method or deduction.
The real information concerns the establishment of the political system, its genesis and its structure. The remainder is just information sound that's not worth bothering about.
Instead, it is worth giving any fresh facts on the basis of which you can put up any interesting theoretical hypotheses that can bring something new.
Is anyone able to give anything specific, any conclusions that have been drawn by the blog community from the notes or comments produced on this forum? I don't see specified conclusions - everyone gets a patella starch, and that's not what happens. Worse still, the effort to identify this mistake is taken with reluctance.
However, the strategy is, as it turns out, stronger than logic. Commentators can be treated like cannon meat for technology and media, or they treat commenting like a morning coffee or taking a dog out for a walk, specified a ritual habit, no 1 knows why they serve. He is. We halt at a 1000 times the repeated evidence that we're being ruled by morons," "they run us...", alternatively of removing morons from public life.
