Krynica Morska, the pearl of Wiślana Mierze and 1 of the most popular vacation destinations on the Polish sea, begins the 2025 period with fresh higher rates of climatic charge. For many tourists who leave their money here all year, however, it is simply a bitter pill to swallow. In social media, it boils, and visitors print photos and films that are expected to prove that the alleged spa fee is in fact a “no harm”. alternatively of investing in ecology and improving comfort, tourists point to overflowing baskets, neglected infrastructure and ubiquitous chaos. Is 1 of Poles' favourite resorts starting to charge for the very fact of presence, forgetting the promises behind them? We are analyzing what the money of tourists is truly spent on and why frustration is growing, which can affect the future of Krynica Morska as a vacation destination.
How much is the climate fee in 2025 and what should it go for?
A climate tax, formally called a local or spa fee, is simply a local taxation regulated by the Act on Local Taxes and Fees. Its aim, in theory, is to rise funds to keep and make tourist infrastructure and to defend the natural and landscaped assets of the towns. This money should be reinvested in specified a way that the stay in the hotel is more comfortable and attractive for guests. We're talking about clean beaches, efficient garbage disposal, green maintenance, renovations of walking alleys, and building public toilets.
In 2025 the City Council of Krynica Morska, like many another coastal municipalities, decided to rise the rate. It presently amounts to PLN 3.20 for all day of stay from the person. For a four-man household planning a weekly holiday, this means an additional expenditure of almost 90 PLN. Although this amount may seem tiny on the scale of the full vacation budget, it is its symbolic character that inspires the top emotions. Tourists anticipate their money to translate into visible and tangible benefits.
Voice of tourists: “We pay for concrete, sound and dirty beaches”
The frustration of holidaymakers finds its outlet mostly on the Internet. On tourist forums and in Facebook groups dedicated to Krynica Morska you can find dozens of entries and photos documenting the state of the resort. Complaints focus on a number of key problems which, according to tourists, completely contradict the thought of a "climate charge".
Here are the most frequently raised charges:
- Filled trash cans: Photographs of containers from which waste falls are almost a permanent component of the scenery at the top of the season. Tourists complain that garbage is not exported enough, leading to unpleasant odor and mess on the main transport lines.
- Neglected descent to the beach: Many wooden stairs and platforms leading to the sea are in mediocre method condition. Sticking nails, rotten boards and broken rails pose a real threat, especially for families with children.
- Lack and bad state of public toilets: It's a problem that comes back all year. fewer public shawls are available, and those that be are frequently paid and in a lamented state of hygiene.
- "Betonosis" and urban chaos: alternatively of taking care of greenness and the unique climate of the Mierzei, Krynica's center, many believe, turns into a chaotic collection of food booths, stalls and loud slot machines.
"We pay over 3 gold a day from a person, and going to the beach, we gotta avoid piles of garbage. This is not a climatic charge, it's just a racket for entering the city" writes 1 of the net users. Its entry liked respective 100 people, which shows the scale of the problem.
What does Krynica Morska say?
Representatives of the City Office of Krynica Morska reject the allegations, explaining that the proceeds from the climate charge are an crucial part of the municipality's budget and are crucial for its operation during the summertime season. According to authoritative communications, these funds are allocated to a wide scope of activities that are not always visible at first glance.
As officials explain, the money from the fee is financed, among others. This appropriation is intended to cover the following expenditure:, including the backing of additional police and rescue patrols WOPR. They besides indicate that the number of tourists at the top of the period is many times higher than the number of permanent residents, which creates a immense burden on urban infrastructure.
The problem, however, is the deficiency of transparency. The municipality does not keep a public registry that would show tourists in a simple way: “With your fee, we have renovated this concrete descent to the beach” or “We have financed additional garbage baskets in this location.” The deficiency of specified communication makes tourists feel ignored and their money is wasted.
The Future of the Climate Charge: Time for Change
The situation in Krynica Morska is simply a symptom of a wider problem concerning many Polish resorts. The climate tax, which was expected to be a tool for raising standards, in many places has just become another easy taxation collection. The deficiency of a direct link between the deposit and the visible effect undermines trust and creates a sense of injustice.
Tourism experts agree: in order to save the thought of a climate charge, municipalities must bet on full transparency and dialog with tourists. The creation of dedicated targeted funds and information about circumstantial projects carried out with this money may be crucial. possibly the time has come for tourists themselves, through surveys or online voting, to be able to co-decide on what to allocate the funds they have collected. Without specified changes, frustration will grow, and tourists, voting in wallets, can yet choose other, better managed places to remainder on vacation.
Continued here:
The climate taxation in Krynica is simply a fiction? Tourists show what they truly pay for
