After announcing the results of the second circular of presidential elections commentariat1 on X, especially the left-wing one, issued a judgement — Trzaskowski lost by “libkism”, i.e.: the swindling of the state from the region for the benefit of large cities, liberal economical views focused on reducing taxes or not introducing fresh ones (such as cadastral taxation for second and subsequent housing) or aversion to direct social financial transfers specified as 800+ or 14th retirement. And likewise – Nawrocki was to win thanks to the fact that Poles anticipate a more left-wing economical program, and his organization is associated with social transfers and mostly understood care for territory Poland and the average man.
In this essay, I will go against the current of this communicative — I will present data that contradict specified setting of cases, both those “hard” as economical and demographic data, as well as those “soft” as focus groups or social media monitoring reports. I will besides give my own hypothesis on what has mobilized voters to vote for Nawrocki.
This article is the first on this blog that we post for a paywall. The analyses and maps presented here take quite a few time and effort, so financial support for readers is crucial for further improvement of the profile. We hope that the quality of existing studies available to the public, specified as the analysis of Polarisation-diffusion model triumphs, convince you to subscribe to our content.
To become our subscriber you have 2 options: direct subscription here on Substack or become our patron on Patronite. As part of the promotion for the first subscribers deciding on the yearly subscription through Substack, we presently offer 50% discount. To use, acquisition a subscription under this link.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Extreme Cartography to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
