The debate was organized in a alternatively intimate formula, but besides raised questions from the audience. After all, it was hard to escape the conclusion that Magdalena Biejat and Simon Holovnia were fighting for fundamentally nothing. Their support is low, it is hard to imagine that they have a chance to enter the second round.
Maybe that's why the real fight was missing here (but in a affirmative sense). There was a alternatively constructive dispute. They're both rhetorical, so it's just good to see it, despite the fact that there's any kind of insecurity.
I watched the Biejat debate with Holovnia in Gdynia. Here's what you request to know about her.
This is what we should remember about this debate.
First: Magdalena Biejat advocated a simplification in the retirement age for men. According to Szymon Holownia, this is not a good option, due to the fact that the pensions of the masters will simply be lower. alternatively of lowering his age, he postulates to reward those who want to work longer.
Biejat explained, however, that it is essential to "create conditions so that those who want and can inactive work are not pushed out of the labour market."
The issue must have been abortion. In short, the Holovnia reiterates that there should be a referendum on this issue. That's his constant postulate. Biejat, on the another hand, believes that specified a position serves to "do not gotta make decisions". She advocates legal abortion.
It is hard to say whether the issue of wellness contributions is socially burning. But she was surely 1 of the tiny points of inflammation in this debate. The sledge continued in the position that contributions to entrepreneurs should be lower. That's what happened, the law passed through the Sejm. The Left protested against it. Biejat recalled that it was "the creation of chaos and another breach in the wellness system".
They were both in favour of developing social construction, strengthening our position in European and NATO structures.
Curiosities: Holovnia said he wouldn't vote for the same-sex matrimony bill. He added that he was a supporter of the Association Act. He explained that specified a bill would let you to take "the first step towards noticing a problem that shamefully hid under the carpet".
In conclusion, we did not learn anything new, but the gathering passed in a affirmative atmosphere. And Biejat, and Holovnia, I think they agreed more frequently than they truly fought. But they surely sought the votes.
At the very beginning, the harrow asked Biejat if he truly wanted to become president. The Vice Marshal of the legislature assured that she "obviously wanted". – But the fact is that I am fighting for the strong position of the Left in Poland and in this government – she admitted honestly.
