Hypodone for Idiots

niepoprawni.pl 14 hours ago

Before Chat­boty #AI became numerous, I thought that I had any defectment that I could not sleep, correctly, express myself. due to the fact that I've been reading for 35 years now, and I've been getting a call-out, as if the finalist had nothing to do with what I wrote. About 90% of the total. Well, I was practicing in a manspool, and I became drunk as rapidly as possible for a gymnasium.

So erstwhile ChatGPT came along and then the another LLMs came along, I copied my notes and asked them how they did. And it turned out that the first ones, the simplest ones, that I wrote, did not solve the very content of the written text, but besides the different allusions, the sarkam or the kulturium I used.

So it can't be that I don't have a problem. It's simple. These debi­s proceed to bring together notes and writings. It's a terrible tragedy, it's a secondary analg­phetism, but it's not like it can read, and then it's able to finish it, but it's not like there's any kind of growth and thinking. This is simply a witness to the state's failure of education, which has gone beyond all.

I wrote this on the Facebook page and received a message:

"I don't care about you. What you compose is hard adequate to follow due to the fact that it takes this structure. any of Your Texts (for example, with an overt tooth) are an entirely related series of worlds where, after reading, you can't imagine what you had in mind. ..."

Here's my overt tooth text:
]]>https://ne­pręt­ni.pl/blog/gps65/neodar­cations]]>

Well, I did #AI what I thought and got back:

______________

Your text in its entirety, as well as your literal content, as well as the metaforic contributions ("third eye" to the study), and the trans-humatic context, to which you are bound in your own published language. For me, this is consistent and local, but I see why your friend can have a problem — and not necessarily due to the fact that the readers are “debile”.

They may:

1. Difficulty levels

  • Mericly – it is not hard for people with science, biology, evolution and transhumation concepts.
  • Style – it is not the language “for gymnasium”. Long-term sentences, dygre­sions, inherent gen­tures and irony, and the te­mats are transmitted from a multi-blying (denite) to the macro-evolution of man and post-life.
  • Hermetology – you usage cultural codes and presume that the reader knows the underlying biological features (e.g. what is difidontism) and the conceptual concepts (trans-humanism). If individual does not know, they lose the thread.

2. For what reason AI is not:

  • LLM has the possible to "resource" a context, if it is not known of the term, to usage it in its power and to grow it in relation to the full text.
  • A human reader who does not know the concept or misses an allu­tion, loses a thread of Narr­ation and frequently has no friction to read or Google.
  • You don't have the "bridges" that make it easy for the average readable reading to go from thread A to thread B — so if individual falls out of the rhytium, it's already in the "train of the world".

3. How can this look to the average recipient:

  • First subparagraph – it's liquid, due to the fact that it's sobly, but it's about to turn into a methafore ("third eye") and any of the readers are going to ask: does it transmit or mediocre fact?
  • Central – there are many examples of zoological and thermal expertise in the short term. For individual who doesn't know this, it's an expression.
  • Physical – a violent leap from a hundredth to the doctrine of evolution and trans-humanity. Meritorically, this is related, but it has a relation that doesn't always work smoothly.

4. Is it a question of structure?

Yes, part of it. You have a rich content in the infer­forms, but you are more able than I thought:

  1. Starting point (Dentical → additional tooth)
  2. Meta­fore (third eye → study)
  3. Environment
  4. Comparative between the 2 sides
  5. Environmental and method cooperation
  6. The large thesis on trans-humanism

For a common to linear network, the “handheld” of texts can be tiring.

Substitution

  • I consider the text 100% – and I think that anyone who is utilized to reading post-pular-scientific essays with physique and irony, will besides grow.
  • The collective has a participative effect – not for a client without your context and with little friction, it reads little easily.
  • And it does have a superiority in the decoupling of the tactile content, due to the fact that the second "complements" the context that the average reader does not have.

______________

And so my text was translated by AI to be common for the average reader:

______________

Hipe­orientation, three-eye and future skills

1. Diagnosis and metadata

Dentist detected hipe­rodonation in me — an additional tooth. I'm inactive on full call, so I don't know how many. But I'm certain I'll besides have 3 eyes on X-rays.
Of course, there are no mystical organs, the back of which is inquisitive – the ability to work deeper than others, to see what is hidden under the surface. It's "games" of the stuff to the bottom. And I realized that most of these people are gone, and they're getting tense erstwhile I do.

2. Hipe­orientation and evolution

The hype-donation is small, but it can be caused by evolutionary changes — e.g. the formation of a 3rd line of teeth. It may have been that any time in histories they had it, but the quality of it has gone and is now in a large deal of time for their respect.

3. For any reason this was not necessary

In the past, they have frequently lived to the age in which they lost their teeth to the age of endurance or renewal.

Today, the average dimension of life is 80 years. The 3 sets of teeth would so be practical, but we now have a technology, specified as proté­tés, implants, or re-generation, that's a hundredfold.

4. Evolutionary advantage of the grandfathers

The ability to resize the teeth could give emergence to an economical advantage: older ones could actively feed in, expanding the endurance of the communities.

The grandfathers and the children are already having a crucial reproductive effect — they are uncommon in the world. If their crops become equally crucial as their parents' plants, the evolution can be “declared” that the 3 sets of teeth are needed.

5. How it looks in another mammals

  • Monofidontism – 1 set of teeth for the full life (delfiny, any of them).
  • Di­fiodontism – 2 of the following: milk and solid (people, dogs, cats, most mammals).
  • Polyfidontism – the teeth are very strong (saints, mañatas, kangaroos).

6. Why does not this evolution work?

The changing evolution lasts a 1000 years. That's how technology develops faster. This time in Japan and the USA, exhibitions are conducted:

  • stimulants of growth teeth,
  • full teeth from tiny cells,
  • Farmatic "exposure" of the 3rd station.

The first tenets on my head indicated that it could consequence in an increase in extra teeth after a natural ligature. investigation in humans is simply a quisty.

7. From the table to the trans-humanity

This leads to a wider extremity: the biological evolution of a man practically stood in the area. We're going to be able to "release" anything, and we're going to do it faster thanks to technology.

For this reason, the trans-humanity is unavoidable. And it may not be essential in the future for us to usage energy, due to the fact that if we do not replace energy directly, we will request energy – as the energy to smochod. In this way, the nancial cord will be unnecessary.

8. fresh evaluator

The fact that the technology takes over the function of a natural feature does not indicate the end of the evolution — I will change its scope. The blind bio-selection will lead to the routing, the entourage and the intelligent project.

It will be a fresh faza — neodarvism of the temple.

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>

Read Entire Article