A pair of British sodomites who became the first “parents” to substitute for 8 children from surrogacy years ago were accused of trafficking in human beings, rape and sexual assault.
Homoadoptions bring scandal behind scandal, and the alleged "progress" of society repeatedly collides with violent reality. The British media has just discussed the detention of Barri Drewitt-Barlow, 1 of the most celebrated homosexual “fathers” in Britain, promoted over the years as a symbol of modern parenting.
Communication from the British Police from Essex, May 21, 2026, reports that the investigation into Barri Drewitt-Barlow and his anal partner Scott Drewitt-Barlow was extended and the police made further detentions in the case of "trafficking people for sexual abuse, rape and another sexual crimes".
The case has caused a immense stir not only due to the fact that it concerns media individuals (the first authoritative pair of deviants to legally get children in the UK by the method of surrogation), but above all due to the fact that for years the political and media establishment has presented deviating unions as progressive, even better than marriages of women and men. We have all been attacking with slogans that “it is better for children to get into a couple of gay lovers than to live among pathological consecutive families.”
Moreover, anyone who tried to rise questions about the welfare of children and the fact that sodomitic compounds are assumed to be pathological was immediately accused of “homophobia” and “hate”. However, reality shows that social experiments conducted on children end dramatically and what is more – this is actually a norm.
It is worth recalling that Drewitt-Barlow was 1 of the pioneers of homosexual “parenting” in Britain. For years the media created it as a celebrity and a model of a modern family, alternatives to conventional families. He was portrayed as a serious husband and father for foster children. present the same man is at the center of very serious criminal charges.
In fresh years, there have been respective high-profile cases of force against children in adoption environments created by single-sex couples. In the United States, William and Zachary Zulock were sentenced to 100 years in prison for sexual abuse of adopted boys. The case of 13-month-old Preston Davey, who died after violent abuse erstwhile he was under the care of 2 deviants seeking adoption, echoed in the same UK.
It is peculiarly worrying that welfare systems are increasingly ignoring informing signals. A fresh study on the alleged “Beastie House” in Glasgow revealed that officials and social services have for years ignored alarming signals about the usage of children by sodomites-pedophiles groups.
Of course, the media will argue that not all sodomite poses a threat to children. Meanwhile, the problem is real and growing. The increasing number of pedophile scandals with pairs of sodomites in the lead function indicates that the alleged "sexual orientation" is of considerable importance in the context of adoption-related crime and foster care. Sodomitic couples are simply an increased hazard group for pathological and pedophilic behaviour, as is the advanced hazard group for HIV infection. Unfortunately, the authorities have underestimated this substance in the name of political correctness.
The state should be guided primarily by the rule of maximum kid safety, not by ideological force from activists. More and more people are starting to ask questions that were practically banned in public debate a fewer years ago. Should a kid truly be treated as an adult “law”? Does the desire to have a kid automatically mean that the State should entrust specified a child? Finally, did not politicians and activists go besides far by redefining the concept of family?
The well-being of the kid should be beyond ideological fashion, political correctness and expectations of activist environments. all case of force against children is simply a tragedy, but it is peculiarly dangerous to place left-wing ideology above caution. And this is the direction that prevails in Western countries.
OUR COMMENTS: Since 2 sodomites from the media candlestick themselves committed specified serious crimes against children, it is easy to imagine what they do to those little famous, in their home diapers, out of camera reach.
View picture: Barrie Drewitt-Barlow and Scott Drewitt-Barlow along with children acquired by surrogacy.
We besides recommend: There's an appeal for a zoophile from Kłodzka.
