"Here's the worst part of the German call for an "attack on the Crimean bridge". It seems that any officers have forgotten what country they curse to defend – and besides, they are truly bad at cheating"

grazynarebeca5.blogspot.com 1 year ago

Tarik Cyril Amar is simply a historian and expert in global politics.He earned a bachelor's degree from modern past at the University of Oxford, a master's degree in global past at LSE, and a PhD in past at Princeton University.He was a scholarship holder of the Holocaust Memorial Museum and the Ukrainian Harvard investigation Institute and headed the Center for Urban past in Lviv, Ukraine.He comes from Germany, lived in the UK, Ukraine, Poland, USA and Turkey.

Since Russia revealed that on February 19, high-ranking Luftwaffe officers discussed, in rule an open conference platform, how German Taurus maneuvering rockets could hit Russian targets (called “Taurus Huddle”), the social consequence in the West increasedtwo main forms: in Germany, the key registry is simply a clumsy harm control;Among Berlin's allies there was shame and barely hidden anger due to many indiscretions – especially concerning the secret operations of the UK and the US in Ukraine.

© Leonhard Simon/Getty Images

Irritation of allies has been reflected in virulent headlines specified as The Telegraph: "Germany reveals British military secrets... utilizing the ready-made video telephone technology, which is 1 of the worst safety violations in Berlin since the Cold War".

Berlin's inept attempts to refrain from what Chancellor Olaf Scholz called ‘very serious’ The case consisted of 2 meaningless moves.

First tell all about Russia: “How wicked they have hacked us!”Of course, moralizing about regular eavesdropping among opponents seems alternatively foolish of the government, who does not head blowing up pipelines and armed disindustrialisation between "sociants".

A alternatively feeble complaint besides makes the German elite look even more sophomore.

Public service announcement for a completely fresh ‘Zeitenwende’ Germany: Yes, the countries, especially the countries against which you are fighting a replacement war, will collect information about you.

If your boss is clumsy adequate to betray information through net communications that can easy be hacked, you can only blame yourself.

In the same spirit, German defence minister Boris Pistorius called Russia's vulnerability to Berlin's madness "hybrid disinformation attack".

In fact, he is afraid not about “disinformation”, but alternatively about facts that even Germany had to consider authentic.

Berlin's reaction only shows that his techniques of evasion and Kiev are now converging: it so happens that Ukrainian president Vladimir Zelenski already – preventively, so to talk – for any future Ukrainian rebellion against his virtually disastrous leadership blamed Russian ‘disinformation’.

Between German Tweedle-Dee and Ukrainian Tweedle-Dum the regulation is the same: confuse yourself, blame others (e.g. Russia).Berlin's second decision to blow smoke due to its failure is to avoid talking about its substance.If you can even summarize the contents of the Bull's Meeting, it is only to mislead the claim that it was a harmless routine: you know, planners will plan;It's just a hypothetical brainstorm.

Moreover, they simply followed orders (‘Old but Gold’ German political culture), preparing a briefing for the minister.

Once again, Pistorius took the lead in bleaching, declaring that officers "they were only doing what they stayed for."

In fact, this is an astonishingly revealing statement: if the Taurus Group is now part of the average ‘work’ – as Pistorius besides put – German officers, everything is much worse again.To realize why, we must do what so many Germans love to avoid: to delve into the details of the scandal.The basics are simple: the recording of the conversation takes almost 40 minutes;There were 4 participants.

Two with advanced and crucial functions: Head of German Air Force Ingo Gerhartz and Head of Operations and Training Department Frank Grafe.

They're both generals.In addition, 2 lower-ranking experts (Oberstleutnant) from the Air Operations Command at the Space Operations Center, called Fenske and Frohstedte (or possibly Frostedte) participated in the study.

The discussion details the options for the usage of Taurus missiles – formally by Ukrainians, but with the irreplaceable participation of Germany, and possibly the UK and the USA – against the bridge in the Kerchen Strait or Russian ammunition depots.

Two participants usually emphasize the feasibility of specified operations (Fenske and Frohstedte), 1 – in his opinion – is more ambivalent, points to obstacles and emphasizes that German engagement is hard to hide (Grafe).

The disturbing thing is that Gerhartz, the chief of the air force, can't detect what he calls ‘obstacle’, or a clear reason not to launch a secret rocket attack on Russian targets through Ukraine.The first speech is informal, and the language is frequently sloppy: a unusual hybrid German ‘Kauderwelsch’, as Germany utilized to say), frequently barely grammatical and saturated with comical English calculus ‘to cheat’ becomes ‘den Trickpullen’ (to invent a trick); the attack is ‘executable’if the Ukrainians learn, for example, ‘das Ding zu schiessen” (shoot).This is not Ernst Jünger's advanced style.

To get free of 2 diametrically different interpretations: the discussion is not tantamount to a clear plot.

This is not a gathering of inappropriate officers, openly discussing how to affect their political leaders in a secret rocket attack on Russia utilizing Ukrainian attorneys.

But this is besides the best thing to say about Taurus Huddle, which has a very low bar.

Because – here is the second popular misunderstanding we gotta get free of – this is not a average gathering either.

They are not what Pistorius wants to pretend, politically unattached staff officers without passionately playing military thought experiments (although that would be bad for this kind of scenario).

In fact, the best word describing the substance of this case is “grey area’.

Think of it as a sloppy mix of basic professional analysis and a immense dose of prejudice, politics, and indiscretion.Perhaps the most striking feature of the Bull's gathering is that all participants treat breathtaking deception for something obvious.

Nobody sees any problems, but in method terms, in the thought of an actual German attack on Russia, as long as it can be concealed or denied the German contribution.

In specified a spirit, officers reflect on details, specified as sending information about the mark or a safe data line (oh, irony...), or possibly a individual courier through Poland.

(Germany paints a big, fat goal for Russians in Poland?

Qui mal y pense!)

Or how a Taurus-producing company (MBDA) could service as a cut-out to cover up military engagement.

Their ideas are amazingly primitive, but more crucial is the pure criminal energy and the boyly recklessness they betray.Some may say that in war everything is fair.

But this answer has 2 drawbacks: firstly, Germany is not truly at war with Russia – and the participants of the gathering do not presume that this will happen (at least at the beginning, and ‘the day after tomorrow’ does not seemif you are curious in them).

So, secondly, although deception is simply a conventional and fundamentally legitimate component of war, what these officers consider average is something else, namely replacing fraud during the war with covert operations against a country with which Germany is not and will not be at war.

This is possibly a domain of intelligence and peculiar forces (and this is inactive not a good idea).

There are very legitimate constitutional reasons why officers of the conventional army should not even think of specified methods as acceptable or (listen, Boris Pistorius!) "their work".The climax of this attitude is erstwhile 1 of the Taurus Hudderers admits that with all the German training expected for the operation of German rockets in Ukraine at least ‘first missions’ they would gotta ‘held by us as support”.

Those who do not know German well may misread this phrase – mixed in the first alternatively than just in this translation – as simply repeating that Ukrainians will request help.

However, this would be wrong: read carefully in the context of the erstwhile discussion, this is clearly a euphemism defining the Germans, who actually at least plan and mark these attacks.Another remarkable feature of Taurus Huddle is the utmost nonchalance with which very delicate and harmful information is discussed about NATO and Ukraine allies.

We barely learn anything amazing about the deep engagement of Britain, the US and France in the attacks on Russian forces.

Shocking is the brazen attitude with which German officers shoot at the mouth about these secret operations that are not even their own.

As for Ukraine, her air force must have been thrilled to hear how Luftwaffe confirmed how many aircraft of a peculiar type ‘single number’ remained in Ukraine.

It is certain that it was not news to Russia.

However, I can imagine Russian officers spinning their heads with a mixture of pathetic disbelief and bitter amusement over their German counterparts.

Finally, the fact that even moments of realism do not force Taurus Hudders to halt and reflect.

The gathering is attended by Air Force Chief Gerhartz, who himself admits that even if Taurus were introduced to the game, their number would be limited to a maximum of 100 rockets and that their usage would not be "changes wars’, I mean:In favour of Kiev, of course.

Meanwhile, Grafe, the second Huddler in the rank of general, emphasizes that the bridge through the Kerchen Strait is not an easy mark and can last the attack.The futility around;And you gotta admit, yes.At the same time, no of them poses even the most serious risks that specified an operation would pose.Grafe fears that the media can learn about the sneaky methods of the German army.

But it would be child's play compared to the worst that could happen.

Because the strategy of kid cheating on the Bull could actually "change the war”: forcing Russia to quit its policy of turning a blind eye to most of the western de facto militant behaviour and alternatively to start, for example, retaliationAgainst the Germans.It was the officers who swore to defend Germany.However, it seems that their only actual concern is to find a way to aid Ukraine fight Russia, while the risks to which Germany would put their plans at hazard are being taken away.

The first problem is that in practice they seem to have lost any sense of difference between their obligations to Germany and Ukraine (or NATO, as far as this is concerned).

Secondly, their Minister of Defence, Chancellor and most of the German public besides seem incapable to make this distinction.

In this sense the Focus of the Bull may be recorded in past as a triumph of Ukrainian politics, even if futile.The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are simply statements by the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of RT.


Translated from Google Translator

https://www.rt.com/news/593880-germany-crimea-bridge-attack/

Read Entire Article