Since the erstwhile Review it has been so long that the Nekrons have had 2 naps, so there will be quite a few archaeology. On the another hand, I no longer fit in the "school problem", so it will land in the next Review.
I'm reasoning this Review I'll start with a divided in the PiS. Until any point with this divided it was that, though the deadline for the submission of loyalties passed on 23 July and not signing the loyal was expected to mean automatic departure from the party, but the final decision was to be made at the organization court on 13 August. Interestingly, pollists did not wait that long and improvement Plus appeared in the studies separately earlier.
With this hold in firing it was that both parties wanted to be able to present the another as guilty of the evil of the full planet in narratives. If Morawiecki had left alone with his people, the PiS could have talked about the fact that the Betrayal Morawiecki with his treacherous Association betrayed the ideals of the Party. Morawiecki, on the another hand, wanted to be expelled and to be able to say that he only wanted well, but was expelled. In the background there was inactive a behind-the-scenes wailing about who would bring any politicians to whom, but it is obvious, so there is no sense to produce in this subject.
Am I amazed that there was a split? Partly. Because, in the erstwhile Review I wrote a lot about why this divided might not happen, but besides at the end of the divided subjects I added that who, like not Jarosław Wirtuoz Chessów 5D Kaczyński would not be able to weaken his organization before the elections just due to the fact that individual had the nerve to negate his genius. The open question is how many members will be able to get Morawiecek out of the PiS. And I don't mean just the names and the names I recognize, but the regional structures.
It wasn't until I started writing this part of Review that I realized that this divided maneuver before the election reminded me of a somewhat different situation that was exacerbating abortion law. I remember perfectly that before this happened, I had to break it down to the first factors, and from which I would not see it, it seemed to me that if the abortion law was tightened, then the Law and Justice would pay for it (in a political dimension [although considering all the ointments of the Justice Funds, 1 can conclude that not only in a political dimension]).
Although I have the same opinion about Kaczyński, I did not consider him to be a man willing to hazard losing his power just to tighten the abortion law. Yes, the Church faithfully stood by the PiS and individual could argue that in this way the PiS pays off its debts, but the fact is that if it had not been done, the Church would inactive faithfully stand by the PiS. In fact, there is no reasonable explanation for what PiS did in 2020. In the political dimension, he could gain nothing in this way. All he could do was lose.
And yet Jarosław Kaczyński made specified a decision, not another decision. Despite the fact that the list of arguments against (and these arguments relating to political pragmatism) is longer than the list of books from my Stack of Shame. And then it turned out that the Law of Abortion had tightened it, and mostly due to that he was incapable to rebuild the polling support that gave him a second independent parliamentary majority in 2019. The chronicle work is to mention that it is not so that this law has been tightened up due to any idealism, due to the fact that Jarosław Kaczyński doesn't give a crap about abortion and stated that if individual wants to, it is abortion abroad.
The divided in the PiS is similar. Political gains from this will not be (in a minute more on this subject) and losses will be significant. For example, in the places of takers, which will no longer be possible to give to those who deserve it (and 1 mandate has already reached between the 2019-2023 elections).
All right, but why precisely did this divided happen? Part of the commentariat, and it is 1 that mostly speaks in a sensible way, this time it fell into the rabbit gap and began to tell the following story: It is average that in parties there are splits, due to the fact that different views clash there, and not everyone wants to follow the leader in a meek way, NOT IF THEY realize IT. possibly for what I am going to compose here, my left hand card will be taken from me, but I think that these stories are not besides anchored in reality, and the divided was simply about who will take over the Kaczyński helm in PiSa (by the way, the kind must be very good that his people are already fighting about the political decline after him). That's it. That's it.
If it was about any idealism, Morawiecki would have made a sound during the second word of the United Right with his remarks on what was wrong. But if he did, most likely 5 minutes later Jarek would have kicked him out of the beginning seat, and secondly it would have harmed the organization (a large letter utilized not accidentally).
Or was it that Morawiecki and his people were bad in PiSa due to the fact that there was a turn towards Braunist narratives? due to the fact that another communicative (a note this time by another commentaries) was that Morawiecki would want to win the centre vote. This would all be right – the PiS turns towards Braun, and Braun is hard to admit as a centerist. And it's all beautiful, only that in the meantime Morawiecki started criticizing Kaczyński for being a supporter of WYMUS SZczeNIE (the fact is that in 2021 it became clear that the government [or Kaczyński] is considering introducing compulsory vaccinations), and now it turns out that it is simply a supporter of “Total, brutal assimilation”, due to the fact that erstwhile you are in Poland, you gotta assimilate with Poland and Poles (+ no multiculturalism). To be honest, it would seem that Morawiecki would add to which Poles must be assimilated, due to the fact that if with those who preach Braunist views, I am politely reporting (on myself) that I feel absolutely no community with them and the only thing that connects me with them is that we were born in the same country.
Yeah, in a telegraph brief. It can be said that the 4th confa has just been active in the fight for votes (aka SzuDevelop Plus), and there has been no meaningful discussion on what should be improved in the country for any time now – there is only a "do not fear Tusk" first, and a second race to the bottom on who will prove to be the greater shur. due to the fact that the election is inactive a bit more – the race is just starting.
The next subject I would like to address is the anniversary of the oath of Batyr to the office of president of Poland. Yeah, we're celebrating this kind of thing now, get utilized to it. Although Batyr's fanbase clapped its ears and explained that it was an excellent thought with these anniversary celebrations, but critical voices did not lack. So what did the fanbase do? She played my favourite thought experimentation and began to explain that łohoho, and imagine what would happen if Trzaskowski had arranged specified an anniversary, since that would be a cringe to the nth power. And they completely missed out on this small item that no 1 before Nawrock was organizing this kind of drive for the anniversary of the president's oath.
First of all, part of Nawrocki's defenders is simply a strict sect. Secondly, to defend their idol they borrowed my favourite thought experimentation “what if”. Thirdly, let me draw on the subject: imagine what would happen if the election was won by Trzaskowski and organised specified a show. I dare say that any independent and unsupporting average would pay a large deal of attention to the fact that individual here is spending public money completely unnecessaryly. Since the election was won by Batyr and he organised this drive, not only did the psychic not ask these questions, the psychic leader inactive honored his individual with the "debate" held there (and "debated" with Ziemkiewicz and Andrzej Nowak).
I admit honestly that I wanted to spend any time here on the Stanowski run, but I concluded that it was not worth it. The fact is that there is no "second bottom" here, and that it is not that Stanowski someway hid, that what he does is about money. Since the kind is well aware that there will be more after a possible right-wing win, he has a very strong motivation (someone might say that millions of reasons) to make spectacular fickles.
Unfortunately, on this subject about Batyrov does not end, due to the fact that the unlovingly reigning president of Poland delivered it very much. On 15 August, during the celebration of the Polish Army, Karol Nawrocki was gracious to make a public speech and in the course of this speech he had to remind everyone that he vetoed the SAFE Act. Okay, possibly not so much he reminded that he vetoed the bill, but mentioned that (note simplification) HERE is GOD HONOR FATHER, NOT any SAFE. In addition, he mentioned that we cannot close the keys to safety in (HEHEHEHE announcement DOWCIP): SEJFIE!
In my opinion, this is already the level of dry clothes from very mediocre advertising (or from magazines where the point of a dry gag was that then everyone laughed about it for a long time), but this is simply a detail. Nawrocki's speechwriters were so busy inventing the cloths that in the same speech they had a tiny mistake. Well, it turned out that in the fight for Monte Cassino "our" they were the defenders of this. If specified an accident had happened to individual on the government side, it would most likely be right to be run down by specified a individual (because it is simply a burp). due to the fact that it happened to Nawrock, there was specified a unusual silence on the right hand, and Nawrocki himself did not respond to it at all.
And at this point, I'm going to make another digression, due to the fact that it was the minute erstwhile Nawrocki could show that he was actually specified an authentic fellow, Such, You know, what it's not a product of political marketing, but “tells what it is”. This was, after all, the "selling point" in the campaign. It was the authentic Nawrocki and artificial Trzaskowski. Why, then, why, our top president in no way did he comment? And the fact that the doctrine of the Unified Right-wing agitprop is that PKN is not incorrect (or even if it is, it is surely little uncommon than others).
A fewer paragraphs earlier I mentioned that any of Nawrocki's defenders are already a sect, and this is very evident erstwhile you look at the message that dominates influencer accounts. due to the fact that the message there is constructed so that whatever Nawrocki did, it is unique (it is unusual that on the occasion of Nawrocki's accidents they did not begin to tell about the fact that HE DID IT BETTER THAN OTHERS). It began with Nawrocki "screaming to the soldiers," and now we have entries showing that Nawrocki waved his hand (I crap You not) or "folded a wreath" ("See how he laid a wreath!"). And I realize that all heavyweight politician has his followers, but the Batyrovists stand out with their message even in the context of the Polish public debate, and that is something. And that's where the digression ends. All I'm going to do is point out that I have plans to thin over this phenomenon. Nevertheless, I ask a large deal of patience, due to the fact that this will require me to read a book about Nawrock (an interview conducted by Andrzej Nowak), so it can be very difficult.
Although the digression is over, the subjects around Nawrockie are not yet, due to the fact that there has been a follow-up of something that can be called PawGate, that is, the situation in which the then candidate for president of the Republic of Poland failed during 1 of the meetings with voters, and then even more neglected and dirty the bus and himself. In the meantime, everyone got kicked out of the bus. Originally, I assumed that this was not the case (because absolutely no 1 has mentioned it before), but it turned out that what appeared in the book “Where did Karol Nawrocki come from” can be considered a bit based on facts.
For the record, Batyr spoke about the fact that he felt unwell during 1 of the meetings and ordered to be taken to the bus where he was cut off and vomited violently. His chief of safety commented on the subject, and from what the gentleman said that he had learned about the fact that "something is happening" with the candidate from the safety agent who was in the bus with Batyr. In the same statement, Krzysztof “Rydzu” Radziwon (because that is what he is called) spoke about the fact that the standard procedure after the gathering is to “screw the ring” and bring the candidate to the vehicle. And it's all beautiful, but I think that if Batyr were actually “something was going on” then who, like anyone, but his protection would have noticed it.
Interestingly, the head of safety told us that Nawrocki had repeatedly suggested going to the infirmary for a gastric lavage (which I believe would affect carrying out “toxicology”). The candidate refused. And the question worth asking yourself here is: what is the reason why someone, in specified a situation (Nawrocks claimed that his fellows told him that they thought he would log out) categorically refuses to visit the hospital? In my opinion, this is the reason for the fact that the candidate knew precisely what was happening to him and did not want to leave any trace on paper. If we presume for a minute that the president (and his surroundings) is convinced that individual tried to poison him (and specified a communicative was given to us on the occasion of this peculiar narration), then absolutely nothing explains specified far-reaching nonchalance, right?
Now that the presidential themes are over, you can go to the follow-up incidental at the confederate Hospital. First of all, Dr. Miloner has been charged. Secondly, there was a communicative link on the Kacprzyka office line (feat unmurded Dubois) – Emil Jędrzejewski.
Before I go to the meritum let me compose that in the conflict of Jędrzejewski vs Kacprzyk I support entropy. Now that we're past the introduction, we can decision on. 1 day Kacpak's law firm made a media insert entitled "Jędrzejewski withdraws from what he said about Kacpak about his co-responsibility for patients' deaths" and "although Kacpak no longer claims that Kacpak is liable for the patient's death in the infirmary bathroom" and that information about deaths (which was to be holocho and inactive some) was obtained from 3rd parties.
Then Jędrzejewski told us that he was not withdrawing from anything, that the letter to Kacprzyk's office was a "trial position in the case" and that he never actually said that Kacprzak was liable for the death of this 1 patient, and this case was just an example.
And I'll admit to you honestly that I was a small amazed by that tip. However, before I compose why, I will remind you again that in this dispute I support entropy. Ad meritum, 1 of the reasons why I began to deal with the writing was that I did not like the feeling of “someone here makes me an idiot” and precisely the same feeling started for me, as I read, that Jędrzejewski did not claim that Kacprzak was liable for this peculiar death. Why did I feel that way again?
And the fact that, first of all, Jędrzejewski launched a nuke on the air entitled “Katprak treats people like fanatics, in the South people die due to his fault, everyone knows about it and nobody does anything about it”, after which he stated that he would say nothing more, due to the fact that it is not time and not place. Second, if Stanowski hadn't pulled his tongue, that patient in the bathroom wouldn't have been touched. Thirdly, for the love of a non-existent transcendental being: Stanowski asks a guy about the details of this mass death home, and the kind tells about this case, in which someway it is not about Kacprzyk. Let's just stay at this point for a moment, due to the fact that I think that's crucial. The kind has expected cognition that shows that there was a mass dieout in South, but does not set any example.
Somebody might say, "Okay, man, possibly he was just frightened or something, and he wanted the DA to take care of it." If so, why would he even mention the dead guy in the bathroom? Fourthly, the top absurdity is that in this peculiar situation both sides of the second communicative tension can partially tell the truth. Jędrzejewski erstwhile he says that he does not retreat from anything and Kacpzak's office claiming that she received a letter that indicates that he said these things due to the fact that he heard them from someone. due to the fact that this is happening, at least in my laity view of the “trial” spin. Of course, until these “third parties” testify.
So at the very end of this part of Review, I'm going to repeat what I wrote a long time ago erstwhile the full thing started. I'm inclined to believe that individual made a mistake and the patient died, and then individual else might have helped him cover it up. In the case of this patient found in the bathroom, it looked like this, due to the fact that no 1 looked in and the peasant went to the bathroom and died there (and he most likely didn't die due to the fact that he was healthy), and then the head of the department was recorded as he said it had to be handled in order to keep the crap out. Nevertheless, I am not inclined to believe in a mass death in which the actual causes of death were equally massively covered up, and all this to defend Ducky. A bunch of people were expected to be active in this, and no 1 said a word. And I won't believe it due to the fact that it sounds like a conspiracy theory.
Let's keep moving. If you've always asked yourself, ‘Can you aid the floodgates make a large deal,’ you don't gotta think about it anymore, due to the fact that Anna Koniezyńska has been expelled from KO for having been able to answer that question. due to the fact that someway it happened that 4.5 million PLN went to entities that did not endure during the flood. And although on the 1 hand it's good that there is no longer a Doctrine of Zbigniew in the judiciary (CBA stopped 6 people in the substance at the end of August), but on the another hand, it would be much more fun if specified things just didn't happen.
And again, I will come again, due to the fact that I truly don't know what it takes to have in my head to do this kind of roller. After all, there is simply a paper way (and these “papers” cannot be simply disappeared or held in a garage). I don't intentionally go into ethical issues, due to the fact that if individual wants to take money for floods, it's alternatively hard to think they have anything to do with ethical behavior. However, even if we bring this to strictly pragmatic issues (although it will be thieving pragmatism), specified behaviour is simply idiotic. Had it not been for the context, it would have been rather amusing that it had someway happened that it was only after the 2023 United Right elections that it began to interfere with public money and theft. But it's a small bit like the PSL, which was disturbed by nepotism in 2015-2023.
I lied a small bit about the fact that we're done with the presidency, due to the fact that there's another one. Well, which frequently doesn't happen, the president signed the bill. And it's not just any one, it's a taxation on the extraordinary profits of corporations. Tl;dr was all about lowering fuel prices and making fuel companies add up. The fact that the bill will be signed was not so obvious, due to the fact that the president had previously invented his Much Better Act, called: Fuel Cost Normally. In short PKN, which does not sound like a short for president Karol Nawrocki (I bow before presidential copywriters again) Understandably, in the PKN project, euphemizing, it was not precisely precise what would be the sources of financing of this full share.
At first glance, you can have associations with confederate ideas specified as: "There will be so many and so many billions, so our ideas are intertwined", but in my opinion it was something completely different. due to the fact that if specified a bill were passed despite the fact that the originators did not pinpoint the sources of funding, it would end with the fact that he would gotta finance it. Yes, the same budget that the United Right believes is in a dire state and in ruin. And if the implementation of this bill had affected the budget situation negatively, then the United Right would be the first to launch an attack and explain that it was all due to the fact that Donald Tusk could not rule.
Understandably, in the unified-right optics, Donald Trump never combines with advanced fuel prices. It is always the responsibility of the current coalition (so the another Donald). If you get a small bit tired of discussing this or any another large deal, you can learn that fuel prices on the markets are 1 thing, but the government can lower excise duty/etc./etc. It is crucial that this kind of argument did not appear in these gagats in 2022. At the time it was known that it was Putin's fault. no of them explained that if only Kaczyński wanted to, fuel would be cheaper, but the Huncwot 1 does not want to. The Chronicle's work to mention that PKN (previously, I had to) directed the signed bill to the Święczkowski Court in the follow-up control procedure, but since the tribunal had long ceased to mean anything, this is alternatively a tiny detail.
Attention!
https://patronite.pl/Piknik-on-country-g%C5%82upoty
When it comes to themes that are unintensuously funny, any time ago, Channel Zero devoted to Gierty all week long and it was called "The Week with Gierty". If anyone wants to know my opinion about this man, I encourage you to read the note “Nice Guy Roman” or the proceeding of the subcast episode “Roman Gierty - AntiPiSowski conservative lavirant”. In a telegraphic summary: I am not a fan and I believe that allowing him to return to politics was a very bad thought and did nothing good (for us, that is, for society).
All right, but what was unintelligently comic about "Week with Gierty"? The fact that it turned out that Giertych's erstwhile views (extreme anti-EUism, pro-Russianity, etc., etc.) were the reason for the beak. It wouldn't be comic in itself. Nevertheless, in the context of what views are promoted by KZ and in which the "segment of the market" aims KZ, criticising (very stupid, there is nothing to hide) Gierty's views looks funny.
As for things that are deliberately not funny, 1 of them is the message by Marius Błaszczak, who received the simplest possible question from a writer not so long ago. It was asked whether if Russia had attacked Estonia, whether Polish soldiers should have helped it. The answer to this question seems obvious: due to the fact that we are in NATO and Estonia is in NATO, our soldiers should aid an ally. What was my deficiency of surprise erstwhile it turned out that Polish soldiers should defend Poland first. Then, during 1 of the Parliamentary debates, Przemysław "Prime Minister of the United Right", Czarnek, who, erstwhile 1 of the politicians of the ruling coalition reminded ocb of this article 5 NATO, began to teardrop the mouth of the Parliamentary Speaker: "NO TO 1 AND BROAN".
When I started reasoning about it, it occurred to me first that it was most likely bending down after, ahem “antiwar” electorate. Only then it hit me. In my opinion, paraphrased by superb speedwriters PKN (not to be confused with Fuel Cost Normally), the keys to Poland's safety are locked in a safe. And not just any one, but 1 standing in Mar-a-Lago. It seems to me that the Blissful problem with answering 1 of the simplest questions came from the fact that the United Right does not know what decision Donald Trump will make on this matter. So much for the right-wing super-duper-swing. due to the fact that this sovereignty is erstwhile you gotta yell at the fact that individual has the nerve to criticize the anti-democratic actions of the United Right, but erstwhile you gotta stand on the side of the Polish Army or answer (note another capslock) The easiest question in the planet is not then.
I think this is simply a good time to mention referendums. The fact that a referendum was held in Krakow, in which Alexander Miszaliski was recalled, I managed to mention in 1 of the Reviews. I besides managed to compose a fewer words about Luke Gibale (whose fan I never was). It was not until early September (so more or little after 1 nap of the Necrons) that it turned out that, in truth, practically all the money spent on the referendum was paid by Łukasz Gibala. It follows from this that if it were found that he would prove to be the winner of the election (in the first circular he obtained the most votes) and began to do things that the sovereign of Krakow would not like, then it may be hard to hold another referendum, due to the fact that Łukasz Gibala would alternatively not spend money on specified an initiative. The Chronicle's work is to mention that in the elections in Krakow the candidate of the confegiate organization did not participate, due to the fact that his organization died during the collection of signatures. I mean, it seemed to have collected as much as it needed (i.e. with a large “mountain”), but it turned out that possibly quite a few them had been collected, but after the calculation it turned out that there was besides small important. I find it a small comic that erstwhile they were recalculated one more time it turned out that there were even little correct ones.
The referendum will besides be held in Czestochowa (25 October). This is, by the way, rather interesting, due to the fact that 1 mention initiative (in this term) aimed at the cancellation of Krzysztof Matyjaszczyk did not come to fruition due to the fact that besides fewer signatures were collected. Then the game became thick due to the fact that Matyaszczyka stopped the CBA (he was banned from serving) and it was only after this game that the required number of signatures was collected. I am genuinely curious about how this referendum will end, due to the fact that although there are not many motivated environments in Chevva, I do not know how many conversations have been "under the roof". In Krakow, the situation was alternatively simple, due to the fact that Miszalski himself took care of the announcement of the referendum (+ unofficially [I have the impression that in this Review I abuse this word] helped Sok from Burak. In Częstochowa it looks a bit different and with attendance on the mention day may be different.
However, it is certain that the referendum will not take place in Warsaw, due to the fact that the collection of the required number of signatures exceeded the organizers. Capo di tutti capi of the referendum action, Maciej Wilk, accepted it with dignity and guilt for what happened to PiS, due to the fact that in his opinion Jarosław Kaczyński's organization did not aid in collecting signatures. To be honest, I had suspicions that the collection of signatures did not go as the organizers wished due to the fact that no 1 was especially bragging about how much they could collect. I mean, until a certain point, it was praised and then stopped.
It is worth mentioning here that as part of this peculiar action 400 1000 leaflet-forms were sent around Warsaw, on which people could sign. Interestingly, they were sent to places where Trzaskowski had worse results. It turns out that the Warsawians seem to have no objection to their president being Trzaskowski.
Now we can decision on to the last subject, which is the communicative diarrhea of Sławomir Mentzen. As a substance of fact, I don't want to come from this subject (because it is Mentzen). It started with the fact that Mentzen did not like the fact that we have police officers in Poland. Then he explained that it was all due to the fact that there are gangs in Poland, large peasants, where these women are to them. After all, it is known that there is no "division of duties" in the police force, and precisely those women in the pictures that shocked Mentzen will be posted to hold the necks sweating with Trenbolone.
Then it was only better, due to the fact that next in line was screened the message that Mentzen allegedly got from someone. In the screenplay it happened that a colleague from Wrocław wrote to the author that his boy did not get into the police, due to the fact that the results had a top 5, but his force came out besides advanced in the investigation (AND OUTSIDE THE BABY HAS EAT!). In the meantime, a erstwhile police officer suggested to Mentzen that if he wanted to prove something so badly, she would invitation her to a fitness test. And somehow, Mentzen didn't precisely take the challenge. Most likely individual told him he wouldn't be able to ride a scooter.
Unfortunately, we can't halt the carousel of laughter, due to the fact that even more later Mentzen began to interfere with the fact that the women serving in the military would have the appropriate uniforms. Mentzen had a terrible pain and began explaining that there are no wars dedicated to women. If I were malicious, I would compose that 57,000 soldiers are utilized in the Ukrainian military (according to publically available data). No Sławomir Mentzen serves in the same army. So it turns out that wars are not “dedicated” to women, but to Mentzens, all the more so.
Another large thought for Mentzen is to reconstruct universal collection (and replace WP with Januszex, due to the fact that another conscript would gain something during the service, and we wouldn't want that, would we). Let me put it this way. Is there any military training for non-professionals? I'm afraid so. Does this mean that the general intake should be restored? Considering the fact that people tried to avoid military service erstwhile we had a general conscription (BEING IN THE TOWN OF PEACE TIMEs), I think I know what would happen now. Avoiding military service at the time was so common that in the cartridge in the cassette (I couldn't afford CDs, so I bought cassettes) the slogan was: “Avoiding military service with the primary honor and work of a citizen.”
I don't truly know what Mentzen's master plan is, due to the fact that as long as I can realize women's hatred, due to the fact that it is more or little clear what a large part of Mentzen's electorate has to say about them, however, it is contrary to what Mentzen has told his electorate about the war. So on the 1 hand Mentzen annoys women, but on the another he besides annoys his iron electorate.
In my opinion (which I have already signaled) training would be useful, but surely not on a compulsory collection rule and surely not as Mentzen had imagined (i.e. doing it after cheapness), due to the fact that the value of specified training would be, euphemizing, negative.
And with this, I don't truly know what accent I'm going to end up with this wall of text.
Source:
https://eelection.eu/sondaze/Polish/#
https://www.president.pl/updates/events/annual-selection-president-rp,124345
https://www.pap.pl/updates/Festivals-war-Polish-President-and-Chief-mon-o-safe-and-security-country
https://www.wprost.pl/country/12415443/karol-nawrocki-fail-fail-pochwal-obroncow-monte-cassino.html
https://x.com/KarolWe support/status/2107404131358904423
https://news.wp.pl/six-person-with-accus-in-fare-fare-cause-never-to-get-to-pare-7323041455695904a
https://picnik-on-country-glupots.blogspot.com/2023/08/nice-guy-roman.html
https://events.interia.pl/country/news-po-words-blast-o-polsce-i-nato-skandal-jes,nId,23537521
https://tvn24.pl/krakow/krakow-society-lukasha-gibaly-financed-referendum-st9217321
https://oko.press/na-live/na-live-relationship/official-lukash-gibala-win-and-ture-election-in-cracque
https://events.interia.pl/country/news-composition-confederation-in-cracow-in-100-proc-idzie-to-na,nId,23540682
https://cba.gov.pl/en/updates/5288,President-City-Costochowy-stopped.html
https://www.rp.pl/opinie-political-social/art45214541-zuzanna-dabrowska-referendum-in-case-lighting-palac-culture-on-rose
https://www.polsatnews.pl/message/2026-10-03/policewoman-to-throw-a-mentzen challenge-in-net-macho-a-in-real/
