"Is it actual that Trzaskowski took a scientist to Koński to prepare him?" asked Stanisław Tyszka, the Euro MP of the Confederation. He wrote it on an X, with a eloquent smirk at the end of the sentence. The others joined quickly. Daniel Obietek, Krzysztof Stanowski and many random people who picked up this subject on the web.
In fact, it is hard to believe that almost a week after the debate in the Horses, this thread is inactive coming back. Rafał Trzaskowski collects on his head, due to the fact that abruptly it was spread that a scientist was in his staff.
"It's not weakness, it's strength"
– This is intellectual warfare. utilizing the aid of a scientist does not show weakness, but reason and strength of individual candidates. We do not know officially whether specified specialists are active in another staff another than the candidate of KO", notes Dr. Konrad Maj, a social scientist from SWPS University.
Let's not kid ourselves – the election run is simply a marathon. Sometimes you drive without a grip, where you can get something, or you can lose everything with 1 gesture. Whoever tries to simplify it most likely doesn't know what they're talking about.
– The presidential run for candidates and candidates is very hard due to the fact that everything focuses solely on 1 person. There is no electoral list of any coalition, SLD or PSL. There is 1 man and the full focus is on him – convinces Grzegorz Napieralski, who competed in the 2010 presidential election. present he is acting as an MP.
W And 15 years ago, he won almost 2.3 million votes and finished 3rd out of 10 candidates. However, it was an exceptional situation – the elections were held after the Smolensk disaster. It's a tough run to never do that again. It was very crucial to choice the reactions carefully so as not to offend anyone and not to disturb the seriousness of the situation," Napieralski recalls.
And above all, it was a different time. “There was force and struggle, too, but the social media era was just beginning. There were questions, could this Facebook be more helpful or more harmful? How do you communicate? present it is apparent that you gotta evidence a roll, put a picture, add a description to it. At the time there was stress, which will consequence – explains Napieralski.
– The presence of a scientist in the staff does not surprise me at all – noted Dr. Konrad Maj. – Specialists can participate in creating a strategy of action in terms of the ruthlessness of the message or playing any situations. The election run is simply quite a few tension, people frequently gotta answer questions, they are amazed – it convinces.
Napierski compares it to sport. – After all, Iga Świątek uses specified help, our football players usage our team. And it's just people who request aid in their work, household life. This is something that is average – he adds a politician.
Behind each candidate stands the staff of people – it is no secret. Today's debates are besides more like a competition like... who can be smarter. Everyone saw her take the rainbow flag to Trzaskowski in Koński Magdalena Biejat, who hid it under his desktop. She did it due to the fact that that's the clue she was expected to get on the telephone with her staffman.
"Attacking at all costs is simply a curiosium"
Napieralski does not hide that for debates respective years ago he besides prepared with the staff of specialists. He doesn't remember precisely if there was a scientist in it. He admits that he is simply a small jealous that present candidates may have notes or smartphones on them. And that he had to sit in the chair and have no comfortable platform.
– We've done different scenarios. There were 2 leaders, Jarosław Kaczyński and Bronisław Komorowski. It was not known which 1 would or would not come. I remember working in a place like this in the back of the organization headquarters. We have built my communicative into respective variants – he recalls.
The scientist we are talking to says that "attacking Trzaskowski at all costs is already a curiosium".
– In this campaign, any forget what we're talking about. This is about the election for president. If we treated it as a classical workplace, we would start with what is needed in this position. And I think most people, erstwhile we even forget the names of candidates, would say that in this position we request individual who speaks abroad languages, has excellent political insight. I would like the Poles to reflect, ask themselves a simple question, what competence the president should have and measure in terms of these competences of all candidates," Dr. Maj says.
Trzaskowski collected hatred before the debate in Koński, likewise after the debate on tv Republic, in which he yet did not participate. “It’s very good due to the fact that it’s very unreliable and lying television,” says Napieralski erstwhile I ask if the candidate KO did the right thing by giving up the clash.
"There's always been individual between the eyes"
Is this the most brutal presidential run we remember? And are all the moves truly allowed? It always has been. Methods, messages and tools change, but it was always so that individual hit individual between the eyes – Napieralski convinces.
– If we went back 15 years and asked Jarosław Kaczyński, me, or Waldemar Pawlak or that run was violent, we would besides say that it is fierce, attacking us and action is happening – explains the erstwhile candidate.
The scientist besides notes that Trzaskowski is getting punches from all sides. – He is attacked by unusual memes, by artificial intelligence. Sometimes they show him like the worst evil, and man is only human. Trzaskowski doesn't usually bounce the ball in this dirtiest game. In his case, the engagement of a scientist in the staff should be apparent – he states.
