H. Dobrowolska: Powdered poison - alleged wellness education enters schools

Health is now the main context of sexuality. Thus, household in the sexual sphere loses its meaning. The pro-family behaviour patterns presently in force in the WEDZ are to be eliminated: marriage, a household model based on the union of a female and a man wishing to have children, acceptance of his own sex. They are replaced by anti-family patterns, specified as the criterion of consenting to sex, partnerships, including single-sex relationships, the deficiency of encouragement to accept their own sex, or transgenderity. This is clear from the publicized programming bases and small changes the powdering of dangerous truth.

Anti-family poisonous venom promoting non-obligation sex welfare is sloping through the regulation, though not as provocative as in the first version. Tactically, to calm the public, evil was hidden under a thick layer of make-up.

The most criticized concepts and examples have been removed from the basis – the disappearance of "autosexual behaviour", presented as a medical norm to students of grades IV-VI of primary schools, or examples of psychosexual orientation presented in grades VII-VIII (heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, asexual). But since the list of examples of changes in puberty, belonging to the medical standard, remained in IV-VI, and older students are inactive to discuss the concept and directions of improvement [!] of "psychosexual orientation", it is clear that the cosmetic lift made by MEN is simply a staged change. The tactically deleted records will most likely return to the curriculum and textbooks. After all, the medical norm in terms of puberty and the improvement of orientation will request to be modernly demonstrated and illustrated, of course in the spirit of the assumptions of the full anti-health object.

A akin situation concerns concepts related to "sexual identity". Although "complexity" and "transgenderity" have been removed from the basis, since the subject of "identity" remains, this opens the door to a poisonous message. This message is – you can choose who you are, depending on your “feeling”, and the biological sex cannot be your “worset”, you can change it freely. There is no clear incentive to accept your own sex – and that is not what we will find in wellness education! – can disrupt the harmonious psychophysical improvement of the kid and push them into the destructive way of transit.

This procedure of apparent change, which conceals the actual intention of designers, was utilized in primary schools. In secondary schools, sex education was no longer so skilfully camouflaged.

However, students are to learn about the "legal and social issues related to LGBTQ+ group", various forms of sexual activity (e.g. oral, anal, group, and possibly another forms of deviation), and they are to address the key issue for the model of "complementary sex education" and "education changing the concept of gender" – the question of alleged sex stereotypes.

Examples can be multiplied... The essence of the MEN’s intent remained and this subject is completely contrary to the wording of the Act, which is cynically cited in the draft regulation of 7.02.25. It was there that the legislative delegation of the fresh subject was given wellness education and records eliminating the subject of education for household life. In the meantime, Article 4(3) of the Act of 7 January 1993 on household Planning, Protection of Human Fetals and Conditions of Acceptability for Abortion of Pregnancy explicitly obliges the Minister of Education to introduce into school curricula “the cognition of the sexual life of a man, of the principles of conscious and liable parenting, of the value of a family, of prenatal life, and of methods and means of conscious procreation”.

Health education denies this many times, not teaching conscious and liable motherhood or fatherhood, discrediting the household and showing it as oppression and a origin of stress, and focusing on pleasance without obligations, contraception and abortion. another many provisions, specified as the elements of the "climate religion" contained in the basis of wellness education in the "environmental health" section, indicate the ideological background of the subject, consistent with the objectives of sustainable development.

Raising to live in a household – with a good experience of students choosing this subject, with a staff of about 12,000 teachers, programs and textbooks, operating and being improved since 1998 – was “relegated” from the Polish school by a left-wing officer, who was entrusted with the portfolio of the Minister of Education.

A subject was thrown out of the door – without any justification in the form of an evaluation of the subject, investigation or even surveys – which protected Polish students from the avalanche of phenomena observed in fresh years in EU countries. Why? In 2012, the depraved standards of sexual education in the WHO Europe were made public, which subsequently became the basis for comprehensive sex education [CSE], which is in force in most EU countries. The introduced wellness education grows out of the same model, although, tactically, it does not straight mention to it.

Early sexual initiations, unwanted pregnancies of minors, abortions, venereal diseases and another sexually transmitted diseases, sexual crime, widespread transits of younger children and another pathological phenomena and risky behaviors – which are massively present in another countries – were effectively halted in Poland by a prudent prevention system. 1 of the structural elements of the dam preventing systemic sexualisation was raising to life in the family. The MEN are dismantling this dam now.

Parents, now it's time to ask yourself a key question: what future do you want for your child? Do you want them to be able to have a lasting happy family, want to have children and enjoy motherhood or fatherhood?

Or do you want her to have sex in school and all sexual relationships – heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, group – to consider them as just as good and worth trying out?

Let us turn to the list of akin questions the key assumptions of the alleged wellness education program. Let's put them on the line, and we'll realize what's going on. They're going after our children!

We call on our parents, in opposition to MEN, to rise a preventive dam responsibly.

Do not send your children to wellness education and formally resign from this class!

Warn your another parents against anti-health and sexualizing content hidden behind the facade of wellness slogans. Apply to the school principals and local local authorities to implement good preventive, pro-family activities in your children's schools to combat demographic collapse.

The school's preventive and educational programme should take these issues into account and indicate the methods of implementation. Make certain that happens. It's 1 of the rights of the Board of Parents at school. It is worth drawing on the experience and ready, approved by the MEN, programs and materials of the WEDZ. Classes can be financed from the budget of local governments and carried out in the form of additional workshops or complementary classes, and in selected educational lessons, or in any way.

Let us usage time to strengthen parents’ opposition and equip them with the essential cognition to defend as many children as possible from deliberate demoralisation and depravity.

Hanna Dobrowolska / Educational expert
The School Protection Movement, Coalition for the Salvation of the Polish School save schools.pl

Source: PCH24.pl