A 78-year-old erstwhile U.S. president Donald Trump and 59-year-old incumbent Vice president Kamala Harris faced the duel. This. First opposition: male and female; so crucial that Trump is simply a misogynist who easy shows women disregard and even contempt, while Harris is simply a modern female with feminist views and with political, global experience. Many viewers may have asked themselves, during the debate, whether a primitive macho Trump would dare “take hold of the cunt” of his antagonist, as he erstwhile advised a friend of his, or would he feel afraid that he might lose an eye or... freedom?
White and coloured
Second opposition: old – young. 20 years of difference is almost a generation, but mentally Trump is much older than Harris. Closer to Ku Klux Klan than an iPhone. He besides seems to be an anachronistic personality as his white sheets-dressed racist patrons. This is the 3rd opposition.Because Trump, a descendant of German emigrants, must endure Kamala Harris, an American who is simply a colorful emigrant from the parent of an Indian and father of a Jamaican. Although not peculiarly highlighted, the racial subject is crucial not only for Trump, but more for his electorate, this mass of white "Bidocks", about which – rather successful – the prose elegance was written by J.D. Vance, proposed by Republicans by the fresh vice president. After all, in the Darwinist explanation of America's fall, the blame is on the migrants, the colored, the aliens who caused all the social disasters that the white Americans suffered.
Fourth oppositionThe debate is simply a difference in intellectual levels. Trump is credited as a postgraduate of the Wharton School of Economics in Pennsylvania, but it is not heard in his language or in his achievements. He boasted in the debate that his economical plan for America was highly appreciated by the most prominent professors of economics of this university, but already in its course on the X portal (formerly Twitter) was published by Prof. Katy Milkman, a superb young economist of this university who simply mocked Trump. And that was just 1 of the 33 fake news he utilized in Trump's debate. Against the background of the arrogant Trump, the language utilized by Harris brought, like a good perfume, a charm of a good college, individual comfort, but besides experience from the courtroom, due to the fact that the years spent in California in the D.A.'s profession allowed Harris to consciously usage a number of rhetorical tools that drove the impoverished Trump out of balance and provoked tense reactions, which immediately reflected in the polls. The best example of this was Trump's statements about Haitians eating in Ohio... dogs and cats, and about abortion applied in the 7th, 8th and even 9th months of pregnancy, which Harris demented immediately and with a lenient smile.
Evil versus good?
Fifth opposition This is simply a image of 2 opposing social attitudes. Trump, a supporter of the wildest conspiracy theories, threatening and promising that only he can defend the planet from disaster, and Harris – a cheerful image of the future, promising fresh economical projects, speaking with a grin to the cameras, addressing the viewers directly. A dangerous, introverted egotist and smiling modern woman, saying to join Americans alternatively of sharing.
Finally sixth opposition outlined in the debate is Trump as an icon of overplays, frustrated people, of whom even J.D. Vance mentioned above grew, incapable to cope with life and blaming others for it, and Harris, carrying with her attitude the announcement of continuing what was good and bringing about the expected changes that America is waiting for.
The debate does not, of course, prejudge the result of the election, although the CNN poll announced after the end of the broadcast is highly promising for Harris. More important, however, remains the freshness effect that Harris brought, who mobilized the full organization after Joe Biden's expected resignation, and who, showing all the oppositions, acted again in the debate, bringing energy and hope to the democrats.
