Transformation by Grzegorz Braun

The Confederate went to the election under the slogan "we will turn the table" presenting itself as a extremist opposition to the "system" of major parties. She was bravely seconded by the main leftist media, throwing “Nazioli” and “fascists” at them (indecently). I consider the Confederacy a false move. At least at leader level, with the task of infertilely dissipating the dissatisfaction of these "electors" who no longer fall for "primarily parties". due to that, the Confederate is part of fraud, which in fact is democracy.

The politician is the rising leader of the Confederacy, Krzysztof Bosak, which he has late confirmed again.

Once you realize that democracy is simply a controlled fraud you realize the real meaning of this message – Mr Bosak (believed or full cynically) wants to proceed to participate in this game.

But Mr. Bosak always said things little extremist than Roman Gierty and as they said, he obediently put on a masonry so in his case "moving towards the center“ It is not entirely surprising.

It's completely different with Gregory Braun. It is adequate to be more than 30 years old and to have the memory to know that he was not a politician until 8-10 years ago. Ba! He is the author of a very neat and apt message that “behind the facade of democracy is ruled by mafias, services and lodges‘.

And if individual has no memory – or is young b., you can do a small investigation work and find different statements from a fewer years ago, in which he does not leave a dry thread on this fraudulent system.

Below, for illustration and assistance to those who do not want to do this work, a fewer statements by Mr Braun from the time erstwhile he was not yet a Member, or possibly even thought about it.

(at each recording short summary)

In consequence to the question, Mr Braun speaks here (rightly) about brainwashing children in schools, telling them that democracy is the only and best system. It calls for schools to be organised where there will be no "democratic gap" to be pushed.

“I personally am not a Democrat. I do not believe that an crucial thing like you can and should be spent on the grace and disfavor of the changing moods of the crowd.”

Braun goes on to say that ‘maybe’ democracy could work well at local level, but there is no point at national level. He emphasizes that he is “obviously a monarch” and would like to be “submitned than a citizen” (we all remember this phrase). He besides stresses that Poland (in the default free) will not get and safe its future by democratic voting. He further develops the thought of the bloody revolutionary roots of democracy (truth, democracy present is the consequence of the intense and bloody work of the Masons since the 18th century).

He besides says that many people resent him, that he does not answer the questions of who to vote for – after which he tells that it is simply a "convulsiveness" from election to election, and then inactive does not change much.

"And I think that this revolutionary, democratic railway, in fact a bloody railway in human history, always leads to a dead end.

Braun says, after which he says that the return to this “rail of democracy” makes no sense and better to pray for the return of the king.

Here, Mr Braun rightly points out that independency cannot be achieved, sovereignty can be restored by voting.

The weak thing is that we like to delude ourselves very much and that this illusion expresses itself in my opinion specified a conviction that the Polish issue will give us an election act, democratic.

Braun further reserves that he does not discourage the vote but warns that it will not bring much. He stresses that he is not a politician but a monarch and that he has more hope in a coup than in a democratic act. After that, Braun besides explains that if the ruling organization truly did, that “we could vote them out” then “momentalally change the rules of the game”!

For the next fewer minutes, Mr Braun is "scattering" a democratic illusion and can only agree with his logical and historically motivated statement.

The starting point is to ask the audience if there is hope to get out of currency bondage. In response, Mr Braun, that in order for this to happen, first, there would should be Polish power – sovereign, independent Poland.

Then Mr. Braun says:

I do not believe that Poles can make themselves independent and then keep this independency through democratic procedures. I don't believe that.

I'm a monarch. I pray for the King's return. I do not believe that Poland can be voted on. I think that Poland needs to be hit, that it needs to be swung so that Poland is. And no group, a democratically elected group, will vote due to the fact that democracy is simply a mantra, which we are told to repeat just to be neutralized in our efforts to independence.

Mr. Braun begins by stressing that the fact is not dependent on the majority.

Fixing democracy is simply a wasted effort, due to the fact that democracy is something of its own nature and a corrupt being. It's something you can't fix.

And then the thought of this Mr. Braun is very sensiblely developing the logical conclusion that democracy must be overthrown. After this, there is the thought of organic work, the bottom-up, stressing that nothing can be done from the top up, due to the fact that even if someway the central authorities take over in the democratic process it will not do anything.

Poles should begin to realize that on the way of democracy they will not scope free Poland.

Mr. Braun begins – and then he gets better.

This is simply a beautiful diagnosis of democracy.

Democracy is simply a emergence to the rule of systemic lying and hypocrisy.

Mr. Braun continues to make this thought, from the point of view that decisions are inactive made somewhere above the people whom the truly ruling have in fact in contempt.

All discussion worthy of questioning.

And now the same Grzegorz Braun AD 2023, a small older and with a beard, modern version. perceive to his conversation with Rafał Mossakowski, possibly the first interview after the 15th of October election.

Well, well. Grzegorz Braun, who analyses the results on the lists, is pleased that his Confederation of the Polish Crown has 4 MPs...Parliamentary work“ and presenting these Members highlights their experience in this work (some were already in the Sejm and in Europe).

And for the past weeks, Mr Braun – a man who refused to even answer the question "who to vote for" a decade ago and alternatively offered the public a lecture on the harmfulness of democracy – urged everyone to go "to the polls".

Listening to this, it's impossible not to reflect on what this transformation has taken place in Mr. Braun, What happened?That he became a zealous, practicing Democrat? Because, like “mafies, services and lodges”, like “democracy is simply a facade”, “frazes” – what “parliamentary work” are we talking about? If democracy is simply a “bloody railway of history” that always ends badly – what “to urn”? If democracy fails to get free Poland – what is the incentive to vote? Either 1 or the other.

So, did something change in the views erstwhile manager Braun became Mr Braun? And if so, why?

Conversion to Democratism? Recognising that this is the way to the monarchy which he had previously recommended to us as the best strategy (meaning that if the Confederacy gets the majority, then the Sejm will choose the king)? A political pull? And as a consequence of the transformation, due to the fact that “who politicians it and his conscience”? The arrogant title of the "deputy" possibly Mr Braun liked so much?

Or were there inactive specified mundane factors as constant income, different privileges? Finally, the life of the director-free scorer from incorrigible films had to be unstable from the material side, and Mr. Braun founded a household in 2014, became a father for the first time in 2016, and seemingly has a second child. household requires a steady, predictable income.

True with a property statement Mr Braun has nothing – no assets, no real estate, no car, just books. Is it through this life that he is unstable, or like many another smart guys he has prescribed everything “to be a wife”? Of course, an uninformed individual does not know this, but someway I do not see where Mr. Braun would be able to "whip" in his pre-posterial life. And in this parliamentary life, the full income of little than PLN 12,000 per period (counting a full wage of the Members and royalties) is no wealth. So it's not for the money, is it?

Could it besides be that having a family, and so the people he cares about, whom he is obliged to protect, Mr. Braun has become vulnerable? To put it plainly: blackmailing his household with threats? But could blackmailers be so perfidious as to get Mr. Braun to become a politician and that's what politics do? Doubtful.

Or, perhaps, let the imagination go, what Mr Braun erstwhile said was consciously cynical, was part of a credible run that could now “walk” as the most sincere rightist in the Confederate, guaranteeing that it would not become a “center”?

I don't know, it's all conjecture, due to the fact that I personally don't know Mr. Braun so I don't know or know the “culis” nor can I ask him that with a sincere answer (maybe he built himself any rationalization of his actions?). However, it is hard not to speculate. due to the fact that if “the mafia, the service and the lodge” ask Mr Braun whether he joined the mafia, the lodge or serves any service.

Personally, I am all the more sorry that his communicative to the Wrocław Pact or brilliant lecture on certain aspects of the November Uprising They were rather crucial elements of my own development. And Braun's films – especially ‘Pulses positive, plus negative’‘,Eugenics in the Name of Progress” or the finished series “Transformation – from Lenin to Putin” – is crucial and valuable. It could be specified a beautiful legacy, specified an unbreakable figure – and here specified statements and actions which contradict this acquis.

I think possibly individual will make a documentary “Transformation – from Braun to Braun”?