Will the Globalists Save the West?

Author: AlterCabrio, April 28, 2025

Economically, socially, spiritually, culturally, the continent is in the spiral of death. Nobody wants to fight for what Europe is today, including the millions of third-world immigrants they have invited. If they effort to establish a centralised army, they will gotta turn to forced conscription, which means even more tyranny.

−∗−

Translation: AlterCabrio – expedition.org

−∗−

Change in the anti-American attitude of Europe: will the globalists now be the saviors of the West?

Nationalism is sinister, and globalists are heroes? It is simply a propaganda message that has grown since the end of planet War II and the emergence of globalist institutions specified as the UN, the IMF, planet Banks, etc. By the 1970s, there was already a coordinated and dangerous plan to adapt the Western planet to interdependence. Not only dependence on imports and exports, but besides dependence on currency trading, securities purchases and interbank wealth transfer systems specified as SWIFT.

It was an era erstwhile corporations began ordering western production to 3rd planet countries. That's erstwhile the dollar was completely separated from the gold. erstwhile the IMF introduced the SDR basket system. erstwhile the decade-long stagflation crisis began.

That was erstwhile the planet economical Forum was established. The Roman Club and their Climate Change Programme. erstwhile many globalists began talking in elite publications and white books about 1 planet economy and 1 planet government (of course under their control). In the 1990s, everything was fundamentally public, and the plan was clear:

Their intention was to destruct national sovereignty and introduce an era of full global centralization. 1 of the most eloquent quotes of this plan is the message of the Deputy Secretary of State in the Clinton administration, Strobe Talbot, who in 1992 stated in Time magazinethat:

“In the next century, the states we know will become obsolete. All states admit 1 global power... Ultimately, national sovereignty was not specified a large idea.”

In the same Article, it adds:

‘... The free planet has created multilateral financial institutions that depend on the willingness of associate States to quit any degree of sovereignty. The global Monetary Fund can practically dictate fiscal policy, including even the amount of taxation the government should impose on its citizens. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade regulates the amount of work the State may impose on imports. These organisations can be seen as proto-ministeries of trade, finance and improvement for the united world."

Globalists usage global trade control as a way to trap competitive economies, forcing them to become homogeneous. They take the independency of nations and put force on them to comply with global trade standards. It is crucial to realize that they see centralised dominance in trade as a basic tool for the eventual accomplishment of the fresh planet order.

The thought that a country would simply initiate unilateral duties is incredible. The thought of countries producing their own first-hand articles is absurd. At least it was until 2025.

One of the most entertaining and amazing side effects of the Trump administration's implementation of this policy is the effort on the side of the political left (especially in Europe) to introduce itself as "heroes of rebels fighting for freedom" in the face of a supposedly despotic dictatorship. Of course, we are dealing with globalists and cultural Marxists, so their definitions of "freedom" and "tyrannical" will be irreversibly distorted.

EU elites have truly lost their minds about their message on "democracy". Today, many European countries are plunged into classical authoritarianism, yet they pretend to be fighting for freedom desperately.

I hear authoritarianism is simply a pathology of recognition. 1 can besides say that it is the pathology of affirmation – it is not adequate that specified an offensive decision will be considered dominant, it is the population that must accept it, and it is joyfully, as if it were the only thing they care about. This is the primary goal of globalisation: to force the masses to love him like religion.

But for people to love them, they gotta believe that globalisation is their savior. They gotta believe that globalists someway save the world. Look into the theatre of the fresh planet order that The Economist presents to us. The journal, partially owned by the Rothschild family, has long been the center of the propaganda of globalism. They late published an article entitled “The Thing About Europe: It’s The Actual Land Of The Free NowIt’s okay. ”

Yes, it is funny, given that many European governments are presently hunting and tying people for online opposition. Mass open immigration strangles western culture on the continent. force crime is increasing rapidly. Not to mention that the fresh trend among EU governments is to arrest right-wing political opponents to prevent them from winning elections.https://www.youtube.com/embed/bMzFDpfDwc?si=jQ8iK8c1BhSokAW1

Hell, in Europe you can be arrested for a silent prayer close the abortion clinic. We all realize how absurd the Economist claims are. Their argument boils down to this: if anything harms globalisation, it is simply a threat to democracy. This is the communicative the media is telling today.

Trump's administration introducing the "First America" policy is called by the authoritarian elite, due to the fact that specified actions interfere with ICH plans alternatively than due to the fact that Americans are oppressed.

In many respects, European change of rhetoric is simply a reflection of the long-term strategy of globalists: presenting nationalists as agents of chaos and portraying internationalists as defenders of order.

In a fresh interview with German Information Platform Die Zeit Online, EU president Ursula von der Leyen went further with disinformation, claiming that "there is no oligarchy in Europe". IIn another words, European leaders are innocent victims of attacks by wealthy and despicable nationalists. To be honest, for most of us, this is news due to the fact that the EU government has long been considered to be the very definition of nameless and unresponsive oligarchy. He says:

“ ...History returns, as does geopolitics. And we see that what we have seen as the order of the planet is becoming a disorder, caused not only by the conflict for dominance between China and the United States, but of course besides by Putin's imperialist ambitions. That is why we request another fresh European Union that is ready to go out into the wide planet and play a very active function in shaping this fresh planet order that is coming."

Notice the effort to represent Europe as a virtuous observer entangled in geopolitical confusion between the US, China and Russia. There is no mention of their ongoing function in inciting a wider war in Ukraine, their interference in peace negotiations, or the fact that globalisation has made them dependent on energy imports to their own survival. It's not a deficiency of awareness, it's carefully developed propaganda. The EU president continues:

"The readiness of all 27 associate States to strengthen our common defence manufacture would be unthinkable without change in fresh weeks and months. The same applies to the economy. Everyone wants to follow our common agenda for greater competitiveness due to the fact that everyone understood: we must be relentless in today's globalised world..."

The EU has been promoting the thought of a united European army for any time. This makes sense – in order to further blur national borders in Europe, a single defence structure needs to be established. They simply usage the war in Ukraine and the American economical disconnect as an excuse. Continues:

"For me, it is crucial that Europe plays a strong function in shaping a fresh planet order that is slow emerging. And I firmly believe that Europe can do this. Let's look back on the last decade: banking crisis, migration crisis, Brexit, pandemic, energy crisis, Russia-Ukraine war. All these crises are serious and have truly become a challenge for us, but Europe has come out of all crisis bigger and stronger..."

Economically, socially, spiritually, culturally, the continent is in the spiral of death. Nobody wants to fight for what Europe is today, including the millions of third-world immigrants they have invited. If they effort to establish a centralised army, they will gotta turn to forced conscription, which means even more tyranny. As regards the economy, he states:

“The West we knew no longer exists. The planet has besides become a globe geopolitically, and present our relationship networks embrace the full globe...”

"Everybody demands more trade with Europe – and this is not just about economical ties. It is besides about establishing common rules and predictability. Europe is known for its predictability and reliability, which is beginning to be seen as something very valuable again. On the 1 hand, this is very satisfactory, on the another hand, there is also, of course, a immense work that we must meet..."

The United States accounts for 30%-35% of all global consumer spending and is the world's largest consumer market.

There are no clear figures for Europe as a whole, but Germany, Europe's largest economy, is liable for only 3% of global consumer spending. Germany is besides the 3rd largest economy in the world, immediately after China. In another words, Europe has no capacity to fill the void of trade left by the United States. If the US economy detaches from Europe or if the US economy breaks down, Europe will besides be devastated. That's a fact.

Von der Leyen then rejects the function of globalisation in driving populist movements against the EU. It states:

"There is 1 thing we should not underestimate: polarization is partially organized from the outside. Through social media Russia, as well as another autocratic states, intentionally interfere with our society...”

"The views of both sides are strengthened due to the fact that the real goal is to polarise and divide our open societies. But the European Union besides has a large advantage. Inequality is little visible here, partially due to the fact that we have a social marketplace economy and due to the fact that the power mechanisms are more dispersed."

Russia is guilty of wanting millions of Europeans to end a globalist multicultural policy? By adopting a alternatively Marxist position, it argues that populist divisions must be artificial due to the fact that Europe is economically "fair". But populists are not fighting for an economical parity, they are fighting for a European identity that is systematically erased.

Finally, he addresses the issue of oligarchy:

"Europe is inactive a peace project. We don't have guys or oligarchs who make rules. We do not attack our neighbours and punish them...”

"Controversial debates are allowed at our universities. This and many another values which must be defended and which show that Europe is more than just a relationship. Europe is our home."

The EU government is pure oligarchy with almost zero work and actively tries to suppress and destruct all national organization with conservative views. They support the silence of all objections among farmers, allowing only a debate behind the university's closed doors, due to the fact that they know that academics supervise their own. The more society moves towards globalisation, the little it will be free.

I see this message as a kind of primitive sketch for upcoming theatrical performances. They haven't worked out their communicative yet, but they already have basic elements on site. National sovereignty is claimed to be a threat to “democracy”. Not freedom, but democracy. And the globalist concept of democracy is progressive governance in the name of a subjective greater good that they cannot truly define.

I feel sympathy for the average European, many of whom desire a free society built on conventional Western principles. It is simply a future that will never materialize, at least not without revolution. These people are in the epicentre of the death of the Western world, and many of them don't really know it. Meanwhile, they are told that America is ruining them. I can't talk for everyone, but many of us would like to save them. The fall of the West towards globalisation cannot be allowed to continue.

__________________