Mr Roman Gierty, associate of the KO, praised on 7 February that he had adopted a resolution on the proposal to Adam Bodnar to suspend Proc. Michał Ostrowski. present it turns out that Bodnar actually suspended Proc. Ostrowski. Giertych tried to catch up with Krzysztof Stanowski on this matter. "Thank you for reminding me that Gierty and the company are telling the lawyer General what to do. Yes, this is simply a disgrace" – he responded to Giertych's entry as head of Channel Zero.
We unanimously adopted a resolution by the Bureau of the KO Group on the Settlement of the Law and Justice on the referral to the lawyer General for immediate suspension in the activities of prosecutor Michał Ostrowski, together with a simplification of his wage for the illegal initiation of a private investigation
— bragged on platform X 7 February mec. Roman Gierty, associate of the KO, Head of the KO Panel on Law and Justice.
Tell me, how can you be specified a pest? Even if Adam Bodnar wanted to suspend Michał Ostrowski, then after specified a resolution and specified a tweet, making specified a decision will be burdened with an component of embarrassment – that his Gierty and the company tell him what to do
— he responded to the force of Giertych’s squad on Bodnar Krzysztof Stanowski, .
Gierty's got Stanowski. He got reposted.
Today, after Adam Bodnar, as it turned out, did precisely what the Giertych squad requested, MP Ko decided to hook up with Krzysztof Stanowski, reasoning that Bodnar's decision meant the success of the KO squad on the settlement of Law and Justice.
But you know politics. Respect
“ Roman Gierty wrote on X.
Thank you for reminding me that Gierty and the company are telling the lawyer General what to do. Yeah, that's a shame. Without your initiative, there would most likely be a suspension, but Bodnar wouldn't look like a transportation boy, and the state would have a somewhat more serious image.
— he responded to the Stanowski entry above.
If you inactive think there is simply a suspension, why do you think Minister Bodnar is compromising himself? If my advice (because he would have suspended) had no effect on him, he did not act under my influence, which you think would be a disgrace. It's logically contradictory.
— he tried to defend himself to Gierty.
No, it's not logically contradictory in any way. I can presume that there would be a suspension anyway, due to the fact that I just can't fit in my head, or I deny that individual can take you seriously. I like to believe that you just artificially tighten your muscles to score on the troll. Although on the another hand, you clearly see your own actions (for what reason, if it were not so?), that is, you believe Bodnar's disgrace and preach it... Your initiatives can be easy exploited by the opponents of Minister Bodnar or the full government, both internally and internationally. Then individual gets asylum in country X and gives an example of politicizing the prosecutor's office, and you're gonna be amazed what's that?
“The chief of the Zero Canal reposted.
