Gen. Leon Komornicki warned on 4 September that Poland remains in the political, diplomatic and military defence due to the fact that the state does not have a coherent defence strategy. erstwhile Deputy Chief of General Staff called the current state a "military cabaret". For Poles, real protection of life and territory is at stake, not further costly declarations.
Equipment will not replace strategy
Gen. Leon Komornicki made a diagnosis that the ruling could not pass another presentation of purchased weapons. In the podcast “Without Doctrine” of Virtual Poland, he indicated that the state has no strategy corresponding to the nature of the Russian threat. In his opinion, Poland and the full West did not draw full conclusions from the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Former Deputy Chief of General Staff spoke of a deep political, diplomatic and military defense. This is simply a strong accusation, but it concerns a peculiar weakness: the state can spend billions on tanks, aircraft and rocket systems, and inactive do not know how to combine them into 1 country's defence plan. Warnings that Poland cannot trust allied declarations alone, you must treat as a call to build your own strength, not as an argument against NATO.
Russia checks the state's resilience
Komornicki has long argued that Russian actions towards Poland should be considered as a hybrid war. In August, after the incidental with the Russian missile, he pointed to gaps in law, air defence and civilian protection. The Ch-101 rocket, according to the findings cited by the Rzeczpospolita, flew about 90 kilometres into the country and fell in Tarnave-Klony.
Such an event exposes the difference between having a weapon and being able to usage it at the right time. Procedures for mark identification, chain of command, recognition and readiness of civilian defence must work together. Russia is looking for cracks on these connections. He tests the institution's response, tries to make information chaos and see if politicians can tell the public the truth.
Defense can't be a publicity campaign.
Polish military spending only makes sense if it leads to measurable capabilities. The number of units, ammunition supplies, airspace protection, logistics and administrative and population preparation are important. The list of contracts alone will not halt the missile. Nor does it evacuate residents or guarantee continuity of the state's operation.
Power has the temptation to present all acquisition as a breakthrough. The opposition corresponds to its own catalogue of negligence. Meanwhile, Poland's safety cannot be a prop in a organization dispute. Criticism of the way Polish defence is managed It returns from different sides and the common denominator remains the deficiency of a clear plan: who is liable for what, and at what time.
You request to know what you're defending.
Defense strategy is not a paper written for the authoritative shelf. It should clearly identify threats, political objectives, the way the armed forces operate and the function of civilian institutions. He must besides answer the question about the protection of average Poles, energy infrastructure, railways, communications and hospitals.
National realism begins with the designation of the fact that alliances are necessary, but no capital will take work for defending the Republic from Warsaw. Poland needs interoperability with NATO and its own ability to keep the fight. 1 without another gives a deceptive sense of security.
The General's words should launch parliamentary and expert state preparedness control alternatively of another message war. If after years of rising expenditure there is inactive a deficiency of doctrine, efficient procedures and civilian protection, Poles have the right to request answers. In defence, the propaganda of success is peculiarly dangerous due to the fact that its price is only known in the hr of trial.
Source: Virtual Poland, conversation in podcast “Without Doctrine”; ‘Rzeczpospolita’, statements by General Leon Komornicki on air defense."
Source: WP News
