From trans-gender to trans-humanism. A Brief past of large Lies and hatred [Dr. T. Teluk for PCh24.pl]

pch24.pl 7 months ago

Trans ideologists promise to free us from sex restrictions. Meanwhile, sexuality, as in all mammal, is crucial to us. It identifies us as individuals, shapes our identity, allows us to execute certain social functions. He lets us love and feel loved. Fulfill ourselves in the image of our children, share happiness with family, friends. They are not ideologists, but God has called us to happiness and freedom. God created us by a female or a man," says Dr. Tomasz Teluk, president of the Institute of Globalization, publisher of the Polish translation of the book "TRANS. erstwhile ideology meets reality” by Helen Joyce.

Lies, manipulations, falsifications, the large harm of innocent people – I think this is how the beginning of the ideologie ‘TRANS’ can be described. It is not amazing if we look at what fathers of another sexual ideologies have done, specified as Zygmunt Freud or Alfred Kinsey. Did the “fathers” of the “TRANS” movement more follow the “dead to the target” principle, or “the goal justifies the means”?

It's very good that you started with a lie. To realize the full mechanics of evil, we must go back to the beginning, Genesis chapter 3. The father of the lie is simply a demon. The mechanics of lying, sin, and death is in this way. Satan presents man with the first lie. He says, God doesn't love you, he's a monster, he's limiting you. And invites a man into the liturgy with evil—enter into it, then you will be like God, you will decide what is evil, what is good. You'll change the world, you'll yet be free. The demon's plan is perfidious. His goal is to make man rebellious, lost, isolated. He wants to lead us to uncertainty about everything, loneliness and, as a result, suicide. The spiritual intent of Satan is to deny God and condemn ourselves. Trans ideology says this: God made a mistake. You weren't expected to be born a boy, you were expected to be a girl. Now, thanks to modern technology, you can take matters into your own hands and change that.

TRANS has evolved over decades. First, her representatives thought that all people were bi-sexual (and had investigation for it); then 1 component of the "TRANS" was homosexuality, then cultural sex, and recently, the elements common between trans-sexuality and trans-humanism have been sought. The question is, what's all this? Why is this ideology so extremist and changing in specified a short time?

The foundation for all ideology of sexual liberation was Marxism-Leninism. He entered university circles due to the philosophical School of Frankfurt and the movements of the fresh Left, whose representatives included Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Jürgen Habermas and Erich Fromm. In addition to Marx, the most crucial origin of inspiration for Marcuse was Zygmunt Freud, with his sexual fixation. Marcuse viewed the sources of the revolution in oppressed minorities: racial, but above all sexual and sexual. It was the revolution that was encouraged by youths. It's happening right in front of us. Look what the extremist left is doing. Sex is the main weapon of combat – these equality parades, kid sexualisation in schools, legal changes. They are introduced consistently, even under the appearance of wellness care, wellness knowledge. Meanwhile, the point is to destruct a traditional, multi-child family. Bring in a hybrid model. make fluid transgenderity, as I would like to make specified a Noach Juwal Harari, 1 of the false prophets of modern times. In specified a model, the society of children is treated as a possible basis of organs – spare parts for rich people or the object of their sexual satisfaction, due to the fact that we have no uncertainty that this is the way it is going – to recognise pedophilia as another typical sexual orientation.

Many readers most likely began to wonder at this point what trans-sexuality has to do with trans-humanism. I must admit that until recently, I have seen these ideologies as separate beings. Not long after reading the book “TRANS. erstwhile ideology meets reality,” by Helen Joyce, who appeared on the edition of the Globalization Institute, I realized that 1 is closely related to the other. Could you as the publisher of the book “TRANS” inform our Readers why this is the case?

Transhumanism is simply a fresh belief of modern man that you can freely interfere in his biology through discipline and technology – neurotechnology, biotechnology, nanotechnology and others. The precursor of specified an approach was Russian philosopher Nikolai Fyodorov, who believed that the improvement of civilization would supply man with immortality. Although transsexualism promises man happiness, the only thing he can offer is the demolition of the natural sex of man. Giving the kid blockers of puberty, then hormonal therapy, and at the end of the castration procedure, his sexuality is destroyed. You can't just change your sex. any steps can be taken towards change. With plastic surgery, make any kind of opposite-sex sexual attraps. But the actual effect will always be the same. Infertility and failure of satisfaction with intimate life. This is what the transiters complain about. I'll put the argument that the transsexual movement is directed against a woman. Today, this ideology is mainly infected by young girls. Trans ideologists, they want to kill the origin of life in a woman. Take her distant from femininity, from her natural vocation to being a mother. Make her miserable for ages.

The revolutionaries have always wanted individual from under something “to free”. Luther wanted to “release” Christians from Papacy and the Church. Communism focused on the “releasing” workers under force from the “class having”. Who and what do they truly want to “liberate” ideologists “TRANS” from?

That's what I'm talking about. Trans ideologists promise to free us from sex restrictions. Meanwhile, sexuality, as in all mammal, is crucial to us. It identifies us as individuals, shapes our identity, allows us to execute certain social functions. He lets us love and feel loved. Fulfill ourselves in the image of our children, share happiness with family, friends. They are not ideologists, but God has called us to happiness and freedom. God created us either man or woman. He has given us a wonderful planet and has for each individual plan of salvation that needs to be discovered. He prepared for us salvation from sin, suffering and death to eternal life. He loves us so much that he wrote our names in the Book of Life before the planet was founded. So that we may never die again, he will give us his Son, that he may die and be resurrected, defeating Satan and death forever. actual freedom exists only in Jesus Christ.

What was she, and what is trans-phobia? Who can be charged with her now?

Transphobia is simply a rhetorical figure to act as censorship, as is accusing of homophobia or racism. Helen Joyce writes in his excellent book that believing in a large outburst or reincarnation is an individual substance and does not require social recognition. Meanwhile, trans ideology forces its designation on others under the sanction of a individual who rejects it as a transphobia. This is the crown argument against those who defy LGBTQ+ revolution. Another method of manipulation is moral blackmail. It is most commonly applied to parents who defy the thought of sex change in children. They're being blackmailed in specified a way that if they don't accept the procedure, their kid will commit suicide. Moreover, in Poland there is simply a akin mechanics in public life. The suicides of children, allegedly homosexuals, are blamed on conservatives who are to discriminate against them.

Helen Joyce in the book “TRANS. erstwhile ideology meets reality, it mentions a number of dirty, monstrous actions by ideologists ‘TRANS’ among which the wishes of the bestial death after erstwhile rape, which these people "contribute" to critics of ‘sex change', are innocent bedtime stories. Why so much aggression and hatred in people created as victims of a planet that doesn't realize them?

Yes, the author writes about the repression that she met as a writer for the prestigious weekly "The Economist" after she dared to address the subject. Joyce besides describes studies that show that people who endure from sexual dysphoria besides endure from another disorders – depression, psychosis, and most frequently the autism spectrum. On the another hand, what you are talking about are criminal threats, characteristic of any criminal groups. This is about the immense money these groups make on illegal drug sales, hormones, etc.

Why have so many parents been allowed to "wash their brains", after which they decided to "change the sex" of their children? Helen Joyce describes dozens of cases like this...

In Poland we have a beautiful word for specified people – lemmings. specified lemming, whose only concern is that people around him grin and pat him back, is able to sacrifice everything, even his family, to be considered liberal and law-abiding. At college he listens to sex nonsense, watches TVN24, where they show him drag queens, reads the Wyborcza Newspaper, that it's good to sleep with anyone and to stand out in this company, makes his boy a girl, or vice versa. Fortunately, in Scandinavia or the United Kingdom, it became impossible to transfuse children after scandals about abuse from medical clinics came to light. Unfortunately, many U.S. states inactive usage these practices.

By the way, isn't that a paradox? On the 1 hand, the liberal left screams and tears the robes that it is forbidden to baptize children, that it is violence, etc., and the kid should decide whether he wants to accept this sacrament after he is 18. In the case of sex change, the same people who decision down reduce the age of allowing "gender change". Helen Joyce quotes 1 “teacher” claiming that the kid surely knows what he wants erstwhile he is 3 years old. He knows it before, but he doesn't. I'm sorry, but hands are falling...

The left is opposed to baptisms, confessions, or receiving Holy Communion by children for a simple reason. He wants to take the man distant from the sacraments. And remember, a man in the sanctification grace is not available to the demon, for the Holy Spirit himself defends him. Secondly, a kid is easier to manipulate due to the fact that it is immature, hence the left's demands to lower the election age. On the another hand, in the sexual sphere, children for leftks are an object, a commodity that needs to be prepared for their prayers during the time. It is simply a paradox that a kid who cannot drive a car, open businesses or have accounts is encouraged to make specified a extremist decision as sex change. Later studies of children who agreed to transit showed that they simply did not realize what would happen erstwhile they signed the documents. Then they were terrified erstwhile the changes and desolations in their bodies became irreversible.

Why are toilets and changing rooms so crucial for TRANS ideologists?

In fact, with ideology, the changes in the law are just as fast. Interestingly, erstwhile we examine what technological authorities are the authors of these solutions, it turns out that they are besides transsexual people. Helen Joyce in her book describes a number of cases of sexual force in co-educational toilets, dressing rooms and targets. It reached the evidence of the defendants in which the convicted men admitted that they pretended to be women in order to be able to commit sexual crimes. After the discovery of a journalist, in any prison facilities, men claiming to be women with prisoners ceased to be incarcerated.

When did TRANS ideologists come up with the thought that men who "changed sex" would compete with women in subsequent sports disciplines? Why do they care so much?

The book "Trans" was created a fewer years ago, but even then, the author warned that the planet of athletics was facing an unequal fight against athletes possessing natural male qualities but identifying themselves as women with real women. We had an example of this at the Olympics in Paris. It is, of course, a sporting scandal against which more and more environments are protesting.

Are we dealing with a dictatorship of an utmost number that imposes on everyone around its sick imagination of the world?

That's precisely what it looks like now. I very much like the word "social infection" created by the author. Trans ideology is highly contagious through social media. There are frequently young, lost people who search their identity and acceptance during puberty. They are usually girls who, in search of their sexuality, go into the trans subculture. There they are manipulated and indoctrinated. During the hormonal storm, characteristic of this period, they frequently make irrational decisions. Then this storm passes, but the consequences of bad decisions are irreversible. Imagine erstwhile a beautiful girl goes through adolescence crisis, comes up with the thought of being a boy, removes her breasts, her uterus, disfigures herself, takes testosterone, and then realizes that she made a mistake. It can't be fixed. Many specified cases are described in the book.

In many countries in the West, the ideology of TRANS is already the norm, and the TRANS-revolution itself is not adequate that it devours its own children, it seems to keep accelerating. Can we even halt this madness? Will Poland go the way of the West?

On the 1 hand, the contamination of LGBTQ ideology is the norm in the West, and on the another hand, more and more people are rebelling against many scandalous practices specified as the transfusing of children. In Britain, the war against this lobby is fought, for example, by the author "Harry Potter" a very celebrated author J.K. Rowling. She openly speaks out against the practices utilized by these environments, which means she is attacked, accused of transphobia and referred to as bigot. Many scientists besides talk against practices that are incompatible with medical knowledge. In 2022, the Karolinska Institute, 1 of the most celebrated technological institutions in Sweden, resigned from its affirmative approach to the transit of the youngest. Finland had done the same thing 2 years earlier. In the spring of this year, the UK banned the administration of puberty blockers to children. Thus, trans ideology towards children seems in retreat. Donald Trump's triumph in the United States will further inhibit this trial overseas. Let's learn from another people's mistakes and not a monkey in everything from the West.

In an interview given to the weekly “To the Thing” a fewer years ago, John Henry Westen said: “Gay-lesbian-bisexual themes have been stacked since homosexual “marriage” was pushed through. They don't have that much fuel to engage the public. Meanwhile, "gender change" is inactive a comparatively fresh thing, shocking and stimulating discussion. Transsexuality besides gives much more opportunities to muzzle people who do not want for a social revolution." What is waiting for us erstwhile the subject of TRANS is “played”? The revolution won't stop.

Let's not be utmost pessimists. God watches over everything, and all the lies of the demon are slow exposed. The subject may indeed be shocking, but possibly that is why average people become repulsive and disgusting. It is impossible to logically justify the abrupt fashion on LGBTQ otherwise, that it is the consequence of propaganda conducted by social media. Trans ideology does not defend itself and will should be yet rejected. I encourage you to buy the book Trans through globalisation.org

Thank you for talking to me.

Tomasz Kolanek

Helen Joyce – ‘Trans. erstwhile ideology meets reality”

Foundation Institute of Globalisation 2024

Read Entire Article