Overshoot by Stabilization
In June 1989, the media reported the overthrow of the commune without exposing the fact that in fact, there has been acceptance of communists — for years in power — by the elder Solidarity activists, to “team together, squad together, creative power to increase”. And it was not a cabaret, although the older men already created specified a thing on the “mountain” and on the “down”, fulfilling the cabaret's post – “so choice another amateur”, by eliminating the perfect naïves from the actual overthrow of the hateful system. At the same time, for the sake of creative power, many bottles of high-interest drinks, but props of specified overthrow were overthrown for free to look in museums of fresh history. Well, it's best not to leave traces of specified strengthening of your existence. The differences between the overthrowrs and the fixatives of communism have been obscured. Somehow, all this was so transversal that after the elections, the "mistaken" communists continued to co-ordinate the state with the perpetuating standards of the overthrowrs. That's how things work in the academic domain, too., where, unfortunately, they do not form, although they should form “team together”, the foundations of modern, sovereign state management. Bands of uncomfortable masters and students who could build a truly independent intellectual elite were broken up, but creative power did not increase. There remained the continuity of the elites of “our” professors, the continuity of the recruitment of “their own” and the kind of action and its effects were inactive as in the PRL. The deficiency of billing, maintaining a individual position quo was allowed, excluding those who did not qualify for specified a pathological strategy both before and after transformation. From the past of the university, communism was erased and all traces of acceptance of the vile conduct, or the perpetuation of the most crucial duties of the communists, were removed from the past of the university, in order not to disturb the image of the supposedly heroic past, without considering that "whoever does not remember the past is doomed to repeat it." And we have what we have.
Appendix.
Under reflection and reactions after the alleged overthrow of communism. Especially the overthrowrs of communism!
Why don't the strikers want to know what they've been told to do?
This year, after a 4th century of efforts to emergence up The Black Book of Communism in discipline and Education I developed from AI a outline of specified a study; AI against the Black Book of Communism in discipline ]]>https://www.academia.edu/145386998/AI_to_Black_Ksi%C4%99gi_Communism_w_Science ]]> which is silenced, as are the uncomfortable aspects of "refuting" communism. AI confirms that specified a task has not yet been implemented:
Looks like from at least the early 2000s. There is simply a request for the creation of the “Black Book of Communism in discipline and Education”, peculiarly linked to the activities of Józef Wieczorek. According to his texts, specified a task was not implemented by the academic community in the form of a full, documented study, but was repeatedly proposed and discussed. According to these materials, even a stronger message is given: the author believes that for about 25 years he unsuccessfully sought the creation of specified a book, and in 2025 he published a comprehensive outline of "AI towards the Black Book of Communism in Science", with more than 200 pages.
Three things can so be distinguished:
The "Black Book of Communism" as an existing historical book is simply a classical work edited by Stéphane Courtois. "Black Book of Communism in discipline and Education" as a investigation postulate – present in the publications of Józef Wieczorek for years. AI towards the Black Book of Communism in discipline – an effort to make a conspect or plan specified a study, but not a complete, verified historical monograph. In another words, if the question is “has anyone already written the Black Book of Communism in discipline and education?” the answer seems to be: yes, there have been projects, sketches and concepts of specified a book, including the improvement of the AI of 2025; no, there is no widely recognized multi-authored historical synthesis of the position of the classical “Black Book of Communism”.












