"Feminism destroyed women by "improving" them"

grazynarebeca5.blogspot.com 3 weeks ago


(l. Matthew Broderick and Ally Sheety in WarGames, 1983. Her function in support affects, confirms and strengthens everything he does. It's like his actions are dedicated to her.)

In order to destruct the "burly" atomic household and reduce the population, feminism (communism) deceived women to hatred what they desperately wanted and needed—the passionate love of their husband. Western women are in crisis.

Heterosexuality is based on exchange women's power over the male power expressed as love.

Western women were deceived, To prosecute power alternatively of love. By competing for power, women humiliate men.
Used to give men power; now they have nothing to do offer outside sex. Can Western women inactive love men?


"Every girl who grows up to femininity, without knowing that love is her highest value, was spiritually raped. Female spirituality expresses the attitude of spiritual expectation, concern and readiness to face the opposite, which is simply a prerequisite for the interior whole. Without this, he becomes the victim of a male character in himself, a raging spirit of intellectual or physical activity, with which no man can identify, and with which she can in no way identify. She's a possessed woman."Irene Claremont de Castillejo, Knowing Woman: a Feminine Psychology.


Feminism has turned women from beloved wives and mothers into porn stars and prostitutes. We're possessed by Satanism; So nobody's gonna mind.

Love is Woman-in-Trade, ---since 26 June 2023)
author: Henry Makow, Ph.D.

Film "War Games" (1983) shows, How the Illuminati challenged Heterosexuals in 45 short years.

In the movie Matthew Broderick is simply a computer genius who accidentally launches a atomic countdown and races to prevent a disaster. His girlfriend, played by Ally Sheety, is portrayed in a complementary role, fundamentally helping, supporting and admiring him. He's the leader. But her presence informs, confirms and strengthens everything she does. Like his actions were It's dedicated to her.

That's how heterosexualism works. A female strengthens her husband by entrusting him with her power. That's how he loves it, which is erstwhile he comes in as the first officer to his captain,
by "trust"

If this movie had been made again today, she would have been captain; He'd be castrated and they'd divided up.

From Chaucer to Freud, men asked, "What do women want?" It's truly beautiful simple. They want to be loved. Specifically, they want a passionate, lifelong love of their husband.

But what makes a man love a female that way? Her sacrifice. By combining his destiny with his, he enters into his own business. That's how 2 people become one.

Exclusive sex is simply a symbol of this bond. Sex is an act of male possession. Relationship creates a bond like Velcro, which is destroyed by promiscuity.

Women want to be possessed by their husbands. In a sexual act, a man "loves" his wife, that is, gives her pleasance to show how much she appreciates her sacrifice.

Women request sex as much as men, if not more. matrimony is the most effective way to satisfy sexual needs of both men and women.


Teaching women selfishness alternatively of sacrificing themselves, feminism deprived them of their foundation—love.All they have left is sex. due to the fact that they don't give up au To a loving husband, they are brought to surrender themselves to strangers.

INDICATION OF ILUMINATES


Jews cabalists and masons are Satanists. They control, humiliate and corrupt. Like termites, they bite the pillars of society. The household is the red blood cells of a healthy society. It gives us our roles and identities, as well as the essential emotional and material support. This ensures that young people are born, loved and raised properly, and that the aged are decently cared for. Our household is our link in the chain of eternity. So Satanists always wanted to destruct it.
They pursued women who were considered capricious, vain, and mentally weak.

"There is no way to influence men as powerfully as with women," wrote Adam Weishaupt. "They should so be our main study; we should sneak into their good opinion, give them guidance on liberation from tyranny of the public and defend ourselves; It will be a large relief to their enslaved minds to free themselves from any single bond of limitations, and it will further ignite them and make them work for us zealously and without knowing that they are doing so; for they will only satisfy their own desire for individual admiration."

They convinced women that matrimony and household were "prescious". Men worked in factories and died in war to supply and protect, but women were oppressed.

Satanists had to interfere in the natural sympathy and attraction of men and women to each another and to their descendants. Satanists be to cast out love.

The essence of a female is love, the power to make love through love and to be loved in return. This is the origin of her power. A woman's love for her husband and children is the most precious thing in the world. To a man, this love is his top treasure.

By allowing herself to be deceived, seeking material power alternatively of spiritual power, she fundamentally lost the power of love. He may have power or love. He can't have both of these things.


THE FEMINISTS WERE SPIRITUALLY SPIRITED

Women request a man's love the way a flower needs sun and water. Men rise women, and women strengthen men by subjecting them to reasonable requirements. This is heterosexual dynamics.

Men, if you want to see if a female loves you, make a reasonable request and see how she reacts.

On the left side of Sheila Jeffreys, 68, she is best known as a lesbian-feminist student and political activist.

What Sheila Jeffreys calls "the eroticism of powerlessness" is heterosexuality. But she's a lesbian who clearly doesn't realize that the sacrifice of women is her strength. She wants to turn all women into lesbians who, like her, do not realize that the style, beauty and charm of a female (her femininity) depend on rejecting material power.

The female who gives herself to her husband is loved and valued by him and their children. A female who pursues power in male terms is sentenced to life in isolation and bitterness.

Western feminists, you gave up the most precious gift for nothing.. You're vulgar, you're truly scary. You deficiency personality, charm, kind and content. You can't love him. You're not even sexy. And shortly you won't be young. You'll only have your job, your dog, and equally desperate friends.

Western feminists, you were robbed and betrayed by your society, teachers and political and cultural leaders; and consequently you joined their treacherous ranks. You betrayed your unborn children, your culture, your household and your promise of the future. But worst of all, you betrayed yourself.

But if it's any consolation, you've been deceived. au The best.


----Related"Pearl" on YouTube Shorts understands that. Why are men no longer curious in marriage?
Makow------ Woman's End

Sandra's first comment –

From Chaucer to Freud, men asked, "What do women want?" It's truly beautiful simple. They want to be loved. Specifically, they want a passionate, lifelong love of their husband.

Ahh. "Love" is abstraction, especially erstwhile it comes to men. They like that exchange you talk about, but erstwhile it's in your pocket (usually by marriage), they start acting like children they inactive are – at least most of them.

At least here in the West, men have not escaped since childhood, they inactive think and act like angry boys whose needs have not been met. any philosophers-psychologists attribute this to the fact that women simply are, but men must be created (through rites of passage with older, mature men in a given community). The old lady, at least in the pre-feminist era, could be completely pleased to aid others in her career (teachers/library/careers etc.), but men without women just freak out.

I don't know whether white men in erstwhile ages have been through deliberate and essential rites of passage, as in another cultures. Innumerable men mostly behave badly in their unique way, and especially towards women, due to the fact that they unconsciously effort to grow up, become real men. I besides read 2 books ago on this subject – men passing through the rites of passage, not even realizing it.

Some people think it's the wife's occupation to "make her husband a man," but it's a occupation that most women aren't meant to do. Mature men must take this boy and turn him into a man.

If feminism had specified a immense success in white societies, the above could be 1 of the explanations. Men are madly wobbly and blaming feminism. Feminism, however, can be the result, not the cause.

Diane wrote-

I read Your website for a fewer months. I am a Catholic (repentant and long history) and, outraged and despaired at what I have seen under the regulation of Bergoglia and what I have discovered about the Church since VII (and earlier), I founded the Church of opposition 10 months ago. The parishioners there are infinitely smarter than anyone I've always met, and 1 of them said to me, "I'd like you to read Henry Makov." due to my respect for her, I did so and received specified an education! I frequently wanted to compose to you, but I had doubts that possibly you're not who you say you are – who do you trust today? But this morning I feel like I have to.

Your entry present made me cry. I know the fact about women. My friends and I have lived through this, I grew up under my mother's supervision, and I see my daughters and their friends struggling and mostly succumbing to this evil that perverts and overturns the actual meaning of a woman. I don't know what's gonna happen to all of us. I'm worried about my granddaughters. How can they keep their head above dirt? What kind of nightmares await them? And they have no grace that the sacraments give to aid them.

But from my worries and tears, there is simply a certain realization that the planet is yet in God’s hands. I keep remembering that Jesus said, "In the planet you will have tribulations, but you will have a good mood; I beat the world." We forget so easy that it is not the planet that is most important, but that we traverse it so that in the next we may remainder with him forever in heaven and not endure forever in hell. Eternity is our eventual home!

The calling of a female is teaching her children simple truths about heaven and hell. We should learn them at their mother's knees to be as natural as breathing. To my enduring sorrow, I did not know, and my children paid the price. We've lost so much, and most will never really know how much until judgement Day. God have mercy on us all; Especially us, the women we betrayed our children – the ones we let live, and the ones we deliberately murdered. And may God have mercy on all men who have given up their natural function as protector and host for easy sex. These things in themselves show how easy we are influenced and brainwashed. erstwhile will we even wake up?!

So to you, Henry, and to everyone who transmits parts of the Truth, I am grateful and grateful. It's a lonely life, with ears to perceive and eyes to see due to the fact that most people can't see, and we're looking for friends wherever we can. So all morning after prayer, I go on, I cry and I read your website with enthusiasm. And I trust in the Author of Life and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, my actual mother, and the pattern of femininity.

C writes – "We're all communists now..."

As you most likely know, Marxist theorist Walter Benjamin described lesbians as "hero of modernism", meaning that contemporary urban culture inevitably affects women – a process he presented as progressive.

Reading your excellent text, I besides remembered the memories of English-Valian author Douglas Hyde of his membership in the British Communist organization in the 1930s, "I Believed". Hyde mentioned that sexual promiscuity was common among his co-communists, but the problem for male communist settlers was that they considered women in the organization to be completely "inappropriate to bed." Hyde claimed that this was partially due to the fact that women were mostly not attracted to communism, and even erstwhile they did, organization membership – and accompanying promiscuity – rapidly masked them.

Well, in a sense we are all communists now – the promiscuousness of the communists of the 1930s was most likely mild compared to what the respected mediate class residents of the suburbs are doing today. And I have no uncertainty that the physical thickening of contemporary feminists/women from the millennial generation and their acceptance of the most primitive macho forms – tattoos, earrings, doc meven shoes, etc. – is straight linked to the equally enthusiastic admission of their parents to "the liberation of sexual" a fewer decades ago.


Translated by Google Translator

source:henrymakow.com
Read Entire Article