AUTHOR: TYLER DURDEN
If we accept the fundamental fact that Ukraine is nothing more than a substitute battlefield between Russia and the West, it can be said that planet War III has already begun. To date, the authorities have been satisfied with limiting the situation mainly to Ukraine, but fresh events propose that the situation will shortly change. Something very unusual is going on on the atomic front between NATO and Russia, and I believe that possibly it is time to consider the anticipation of a false flag being threatened.
In the past 2 weeks, Ukraine has attributed at least 2 separate strikes to peculiar targets – Russian radar stations "behind the horizon" utilizing drones with an awesome flight scope of at least 1,200 miles.
To date, long-range attacks in Russia have been highly rare. So why these circumstantial radar stations?
Voronezh-DM stations were located outside the city of Orsk and the Krasnodar circuit (Armavir); distant from the front line in Ukraine. The attacks are hailed as Ukraine's furthest attack into Russia, but corporate media ignored the wider implications of this situation.
It is likely that the drones utilized were of American or European origin.
NATO (until the last fewer days) has enforced strict restrictions on how their weapons can be utilized by Ukraine.
Long-range drones and manoeuvring missiles hitting targets deep in Russia origin serious retaliation, including the threat of atomic response.
Russian non-horizontal radar systems have a scope of detection of at least 6000 miles (the actual scope is classified) and are scanning specifically for ballistic missiles at advanced altitudes.
They are not designed to detect lower flying mid-range maneuvering missiles (ATACMS) and drones.
This means that 2 stations destroyed by Ukrainian weapons are to act as an early informing strategy against atomic attack.
Ukrainians allegedly opposed NATO restrictions, not once, but twice, to track radar systems that have nothing to do with them.
In fact, the plates are in fixed positions and no of them were actually aimed at Ukraine, they were aimed at the north and southwest of Russia. Radar Armavir was built in 2009 to fill the gap created by the failure of radar on UThe land, and was besides to replace the elder radar Daryal in Gabala.
Interestingly, the "fans of exploration" of Armavir and Orsk observe the sky mainly over the mediate East, including Israel, and a large part of Europe, including Switzerland.
It is crucial to realize that this kind of impact into Russia requires complex planning and logistics.
It can't be achieved without a classified intelligence.sheep on the ground, as well as without satellite surveillance.
Ukraine is entirely dependent on NATO satellites and intelligence;
No specified strike would have been possible without NATO involvement.
Moreover, utilized drones would should be able to avoid early detection systems and stay hidden for thousands of miles.
This technology comes mainly from the West.
In another words, there is no way that these attacks were carried out by Ukraine without broad support and approval from US or European command.
I question the view that the Ukrainian pilot even remotely piloted drones.
We're talking about any of the most urgent radar stations in Russia.
Let's think about ugly realities...
Firstly, an attack on Russian atomic defence can make the Kremlin believe it is being prepared for atomic attack. Why else would their ballistic radar be awarded? This means that they will be in a state of increased readiness for possible atomic exchange. Not good.
Secondly, Voronezh-DM stations are utilized to identify FALSE POSSIBLE atomic attack alarms. This means that if a weapon is utilized against Russia, which mimics a ballistic rocket at advanced altitude, its ability to detect that it is NOT nuclear, has been reduced. They can fire their own warheads in consequence to non-nuclear impact (false impact or false flag).
Thirdly, Armavir and another stations could be utilized to evidence ballistic rocket activity far beyond Russian airspace (in places like the mediate East). It is possible that these strikes were intended to blind Russia and halt it from detecting rocket events that are not related to the war in Ukraine.
Fourth, it is possible that NATO and Ukraine believe that the dismantling of radar sends a signal that if Russia threatens with atomic attack, it can be struck first. It only means that Russia will not give a warning, it will simply fire.
Fifthly, the attack on Armavir itself meets the conditions that the Russian government put publically in 2020 for actions that could trigger a atomic retaliatory strike. The Russian early informing network is part of the wider atomic deterrence of this country.
According to published in 2020 r. The basic principles of the Russian Federation's state policies on atomic deterrence of the Kremlin's "conditions determining the anticipation of atomic weapons" include any "attack of the opponent on critical government or military facilities of the Russian Federation, whose disruption would undermine atomic forces".
So far, nothing has indicated how Russia will take retaliatory action, but let us consider the circumstances on the front.
Ukrainian defence is thin and lacks the workforce needed to keep the most simple strength points. As I noticed last month, the front line in Ukraine will shortly be crossed, most likely this summertime erstwhile Russia opens a fresh offensive attack in the north close Kharkiv.
NATO countries now claim to support Ukraine's usage of long-range weapons in Russia. This means that the main metropolitan areas of Ukraine will be the subject of Russian long-range attacks, most of which Russia avoided. Attention should besides be paid to Russia's possible usage of thermobaric bombs; These are massively destructive weapons that have not been on the battlefield (except for unverified reports).
I fishy the establishment wants to make a script in which Russia will overreact to any event, or the public will believe that Russia is simply a legitimate atomic threat to the West. It is besides possible from the outside that Russia cannot monitor the future ballistic incidental in the mediate East.
The radar attack coincided in time with the Ukrainian "peace conference" planned for June 15 in Switzerland.
Although major leaders from the US, China and Europe will not participate (and Russia is not invited), the summit is inactive a succulent goal for the false flag, and thus unifying Western interests around a larger war with Russia. I am not saying that the conference itself will be attacked, but a serious attack at the conference can be utilized to sale the thought of a complete NATO intervention.
If the aim is to extend the war, any perceived war action aimed at the conference can besides be utilized as a pretext to gather public support. The fact that so many planet leaders, including Biden, refuse to show themselves makes it even more questionable.
I very much uncertainty that the establishment wants to trigger a global atomic war. They have everything to lose and very small to gain. They spent most of the last century building 1 of the most complicated networks of economical and political control in human history. I don't think they're happy to see it all evaporate in a flash. Having said this, a limited atomic event can service their interests well.
As I compose these words, many governments, including the French government, call for the deployment of European troops in Ukraine.
Some political leaders want them to go as "advisors" and trainees. This is precisely what the United States did just before sending vast military forces to Vietnam. Remember the incidental under the false flag in the Gulf of Tonkin?
Something very unusual is going on here. I have no uncertainty that planet War III is the intended consequence of the confrontation between NATO and Russia in Ukraine.
The question is, how are they going to arrange this result, while convincing the American and European public to join the war effort?
They request a serious fake flag.
Translated by Google Translator
source:https://www.zerohedge.com/
