Two Polish (cz.3) - sciences and unlearning

One crucial component of this intellectual division is the attitude to abortion. The problem of abortion is so crucial that for many years it has been the leading subject of pre-election promises and declarations and post-election disputes and common accusations. Abortion besides decided on the result of the fresh parliamentary elections. On the 1 hand, it was the issue of access to abortion called "the right of women" that prompted the left-wing electorate to participate in many elections and to stand up against the United Right. On the another hand, it was concern for the protection of the conceived life that prompted any of the right-wing electorate besides to talk out against the United Right. As a result, the opposition took power and the subject of the right to abortion became a key origin in the actions of the current government.

fresh Left president Vladimir Czarzasty said recently: “We don't want a referendum that says a female has the right to her body. Is it reasonable to have a referendum on whether we have the right to breathe? This is your right, my right, all right. This is just life and it is not possible to decide in a referendum whether a female has the right to do this or this due to the fact that it is her life, her responsibility, her conscience, but above all her right”. Left-wing ideologists add that opposition to abortion is part of the Christian religion and cannot be imposed on the unbeliever to the remainder of society. A akin communicative besides happens among priests and clergymen. Recently, I heard 1 priest say in a sermon that Christians believe that life begins from the minute of conception.

Is this truly a question of faith? A question of subjective feelings? It is worth mentioning a passage of the ancient Hippocratic oath: “No one, even on demand, will be given deadly poisonI'm not going to advise anyone, either. I'll never give a female a means of miscarriage.. In purity and innocence I will preserve my life and my art." In the words of this oath we have an unequivocal mention to both euthanasia and abortion. Hippocrates was born about 460 B.C.E. and died about 377 B.C., before our era, and thus before Christ. Today, historians are inclined to believe that the Hippocratic disciples took the oath after his death, or about 350 years before Christ, and The formulation of the basic ethical principles of the doctor's profession may be the work of Imhotep, who lived much earlier, around 2650 B.C.E. This is evidenced by the papers found, Egyptian medical papyrus dating back to 1820 B.C.E. It can be seen, then, that the fact that the purity and innocence of one’s own doctor are a condition of refusing to give women an abortion agent existed hundreds of years before Christianity was born. Abortion is not a question of Christian faith, it was already understood in ancient times what it is.

Today, it is hard to find precisely what cognition ancient Egyptian and Greek doctors had, but today's discipline gives us a full and unambiguous cognition of erstwhile fresh life begins. From the very conception the kid has his own unique DNA, which can be determined by simple examination, just draw blood from the pregnant woman. The child's own DNA is proof that it is not a woman's body, that it is the body of a child, but at the same time a fresh man with his qualities, with his own unique genetic code. Sometimes even with their own blood kind different from that of their mother, which may in any cases lead to a alleged serological conflict. At 2 weeks after conception, the process of forming central tense strategy ligaments begins. In 5 weeks, the alleged old cerebral cortex begins to form. By week 8, the brain is already performing its primary function, sending impulses to another organs and coordinating their action. In week 13 there are connections in the brain between the hill and the cerebral cortex that carry information about pain. Already at this phase the kid feels pain consciously if he is exposed to it and so suffers. These are not elements of the Christian religion but the effects of technological research. This learning-based cognition requires that an unborn kid be given an anesthetic for any treatment or essential surgery carried out in the womb. Give the anesthetics not to the mother, but to the child, due to the fact that the kid is simply a separate man, not her body. Where and how was Włodzimierz Czarzasty educated erstwhile he didn't know that? How was he educated if he doesn't know it's not her life? And above all, she does not know that this is not her right to this life, but the child's right to his own life.

specified statements, specified demands made by people with leftist – liberal views, are evident from the deficiency of instruction. Failure is according to the definition of the Grand Dictionary of the Polish Language “lack of required cognition or education as a consequence of reluctance to learnIt’s okay. ” 1 might ask whether this aversion to learning is blamed by individuals, or whether it is the consequence of an informed strategy. Unfortunately, without justifying the individual guilt of individuals, it must be stated that this is the consequence of the strategy which he prophetically wrote about in the 1956 “Human Obsolescence” of German philosopher of judaic origin Anders Günther. He noted that the methods of force, armed, specified as Hitler used, proved ineffective in the long term. A submissive individual should be formatted already “since birth by reducing its congenital biological capacity’. “Then we proceed conditioning through drastically reducing the level and quality of education, bringing her into the form of effortless occupation. An uneducated individual has a limited mindset, and the more limited his reasoning is—material, mediocrity, the little he can rebel. It is crucial to make access to cognition increasingly hard and elite... Let the gap between men and discipline deepen so that information addressed to the general public is anesthetized with all possible content—especially without philosophy. Again, persuasion, not direct violence, should be used: we will broadcast mass amusement through television, which always flatters emotions and instinct.”.

present it is perfectly visible that predictions Anders Günther is fulfilled in front of us: "This kind of collective force will in itself consequence in specified integration that Only fear (to be sustained) is exclusion from the strategy and thus failure of access to material conditions essential for happiness. The mass man, as produced, should be treated as a product, a calf and must be monitored as the flock should be. Anything that lets you sleep his clarity, his critical head is socially good, and What could wake him must be fought, ridiculed, strangled...All doctrines questioning the strategy must first be defined as subversive and terrorist, and those who support it must be treated as public enemies.”

Are people who paint and display red lightning, people who place 8 stars on banners and on social media, not just the “product” of this strategy? Is it not their collective fear of being “out of the strategy and thus of losing access to material conditions? Does the gap between people and discipline deepen in Poland, Europe and the world?

Poland is divided, Europe is divided and the planet is divided. It's a division between discipline and non-teaching, it's a division between 2 different, hard to realize each other's languages of communicative and communication. But the fact is one, the fact cannot be shared. The fact isn't in the mediate either. The fact must be found where she is. And only where there is fact can there be intellectual rapprochement and then possibly even the unification of 2 populations distant from each other. Only where the fact is.

Mr Bogdan