Two Polish women in the semifinals of the Chinese thousandth!

niepoprawni.pl 1 week ago

One of them will be in the final.

The Wuhan WTA tournament is the last of the tournaments of specified a large rank this year. The next competition of this caliber after fresh Year's Eve.

Although this is the last chance to score truly large points for the WTA ranking, not all of the top players wanted to participate. The share, I compose about those of the top ten, took fundamentally only those that could benefit from these points.

Three of the 5 top 5 contestants ranked, for example, resigned. The reason is simple. Participation in the WTA Finals is assured, and fatigue throughout the yearly cycle is increasingly affecting. Sabalenko has late lost early in all tournaments, so she is tired less. That's why she took off. Without spectacular successes, let's euphemize. So is Pegula. She had been resting from the game for a month, so she decided to start. However, the effect was akin to that of a Belarusian woman. She dropped out in her first game.

The Chinese tournament is/was highly crucial for 3 players. Ukrainians of Switolina, Czech Republic of Muchova and Our National Good. For the first 2 of them he was due to the fact that they were already out of it. However, the effects of their disposal are very different for each of them.

Switolina reached the quarter-finals and this allowed her to collect so many meshes that she crossed the scoring threshold needed to compete in the final period competitions for the top 8 ranking players. She joined the aforementioned 5 and Noskovej Czechs, who were promoted to the tournament to be held this year in Indian Wells, is assured of winning this year's Wimbledon and that she is in the top 20th ranking (one more time thanks to blogger @anticodisiac, who on the last issue, is about this seat in the 20th, enlightened me).

Muchova, after falling out in the 3rd circular in Beijing, repeated the feat in Wuhan. And it could cost her a lot. In my erstwhile text on tennis, or, in fact, the situation in the lead of the ladies before the WTA Finals, written after the most crucial decisions in Beijing, I have already put practically a cross on the promotion of Iga to these finals. For I did not even think that Muchova could be so pumped out in the period that she could not be able to hold, over 8 100 points counting, advantage over Poland. I just forgot it was women's tennis. And here, anything is possible.

Iga reached the semifinal in Wuhan today. This allowed her to reduce the failure to Czechie to precisely 546th points. If next day he defeats Maja Chwalińska (about which he will win the final on Sunday), then not only will he make all the earlier failure to a rival with whom notabene has a very good relationship, he will inactive have an advantage over her. Small, due to the fact that tiny (sixty-four points), but always. If the final loses (but it does not lose the finals) then the failure to Muchova will be 286 mesh. And there will be 2 tournaments to play before the planet Cup. In Ningbo and Tokyo. Tournaments where you can score a full of 1,000 points. 500 each. And if you lose 2 finals, 650 (I am writing to make the readers aware of what will happen erstwhile Iga wins tomorrow, loses Sunday, and in both tournaments the WTA 500 will win after winning the finals with Muchova😊). In a word, it will inactive happen, which I did not foresee in the erstwhile text, not even allowing the thought that Muchova would let herself to rip out so easy what she had worked for all season. Look at that.

The strength of things in tomorrow's Polish semi-finals is to support NDN. I would usually be cheering for Chwalinska. erstwhile Iga has so many titles. 2 that Maya only erstwhile for the time being played in the final of the large tournament, which she besides lost. And three, that the younger of Poles (BTW: Who would have just late thought that any of the world's leading Poles might be younger than Christmas? More. Who would have thought that any another tennis player would be so fast in the lead? The end of the World!) plays now much more spectacular tennis. Unfortunately. In this situation, you gotta think strategically. And if so, the Christmas must win. Just due to the fact that it brings her closer, even if she were to lose the Sunday final after that, to the planet championship appearance. But failure will put her in a very hard situation. 546 points failure for 2 tournaments, and it's not the highest caliber, before the end of the period it's, alive, very much. Especially since it is not known precisely who will compete in Ningbo and Tokyo. For example, last year's Ningbo won Rybakin. I am not saying that Iga will lose to her (because, for example, she won the last 2 skirmishes), but why provoke fate? Best to win first with Maja and then the final. And the problem with the large 1 will get small.

Poland's right state with the Polish state ration, but in professional tennis nobody thinks these categories. Not even allowed (except for the Games and the United Cup). That's why Maja Chwalińska, I suspect, will fight like a lion tomorrow. I'm sorry. A lioness. Which is even worse for a possible victim.

Looking at what these 2 quarter-finals looked like today, I've both watched from cover to cover, the paper favourite can't be certain about the victory. I would even be tempted to say that present the player from Miechów made a much better impression. Iga's triumph simply pushed through. If I was little cultural, fortunately I wasn't, I'd even compose that she violated me. And Maya first, in the first set, gave the performance solo and then in a duet with the Greek. They played a fantastic match (confirmed by match statistics), which about the gathering of Christmas with Li can surely not be said. Both of them made a mass (28:49) of unforced errors, respectively, and the winemakers each had 3 (Iga) or 4 (roar) times little than these errors.

Of course. You play as your opponent allows. And tomorrow, Iga may not let Mai as much as Sakkari allowed. Or for nothing at all. And in fact, mostly due to what I said higher, I'm counting on it.

I'm not a professional tennis player. That's why I can afford to think strategically unethical. At least in the context of tennis.

Read Entire Article