Russian philosopher and ideologist of Eurasian Alexander Dugin after the Russians withdrew from Chersonia wrote an emotional text in which he stated that this was the last line that could cross Vladimir Putin.

Dugin states in his article published on Cargrad.tv that the work for giving Chersonia to Ukrainians is solely borne by Russian power. This is self-rented, and so since the Russians give their ruler absolute power, they anticipate him to save them from various dangers. As Dugin states, “there is besides another side to the car rental. Full of power in success, but besides full of work for failure. How would you like it?”

Putin's throne wobbles

Dugin's open message against Putin is proof that Russian power is not monolith, but is the accident of various forces. Dugin agrees that Putin is simply a “self-employed person” but stresses that the self-employed individual must bear full work for the decisions he makes.

Until recently, any attacks of the alleged “party of war” hit at most in Sergei Szojg, the Minister of Defence. Putin, like the car of his time, was untouchable, and no criticism could be sent toward him. The Russian right, by the way, frequently powerfully monarchist, held it very firmly, and classically accused “bad fighters” alternatively of a good Tsar.

However, since Wednesday 09.11 and since Russia announced its withdrawal from Chersonia something in the Russian right-wing broke. There have been more or little direct attacks on Vladimir Putin himself. For no 1 doubts that the decision to donate Cherson without a fight had to be accepted by him.

Dugin clearly cuts off from any attack on Surovikin, which is the current commander of the alleged peculiar Operation, or full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The philosopher states that the general is not a politician and is solely liable for the “technical side of the front”. Strikes should so not go into him, and “you know who.”

Eurasian ideology clearly states that what happened is not even treason. Giving Chersonia is simply a step towards “Armageddon”. Now Russia remains only atomic weapons, due to the fact that the full triumph of the West – the civilization of Satan can never be acceptable to Moscow. It is worth noting that words specified as “Satan”, “Satanism”, “antichrist civilization” only a fewer years ago hosted at most in “crazy books” published by Dugin and akin publications. Today, Russia's politicians from the highest echelons talk openly about NATO as the power of Satan.

Putin as a Russian centrist

Dugin suggested to Putin rather openly that if the situation at the front did not change, he might have a mediocre destiny – specifically the destiny of “the king of rain” (referring to British culturalist James Frazer. He described the traditions of the tribes of the advanced Nile that worshipped the “king of rain” to bring rain, but which killed that king if the rain did not begin to rain). At the same time, the philosopher suggested a solution.

In place of the “syphernical dictatorship”, which presently occurs in Russia, Dugin proposes “comisar dictatorship”. Its main fresh origin would be ideology.

War, due to the fact that besides this forbidden word appears in Dugin's article, would become a national war in the full sense of the word. And national, Russian should besides become a state. due to the fact that that's not what Dugin is now.

Dugin himself writes about a “Russian idea” that would connect the full Russian state in specified a way as the Russians themselves would fear it “to go foolishly towards the full demolition of humanity only due to the fear of the Russian idea”.

Again, another typical of the Russian right calls for full-scale mobilisation, the usage of atomic weapons (because the conditions of the “winner-west” will never be acceptable to Russia). Dugin claims that all changes and corrections introduced in the current “Special Military Operations” do not bring any results.

It should not surprise anyone that the philosopher assumes that the only answer to the current Russian defeats on the front can be ideology. But if you read a small more about Dugin's ideology, it can be revealed with horror that Vladimir Putin with his anti-Western statements appears almost as a Russian centrist, compared to Alexander Dugin and likewise reasoning him.

Can Putin warrant stability?

The existence of Russian pigeons and hawks should not surprise anyone. The problem is that Vladimir Putin with his “three-day peculiar operation” calculated for a fast triumph most likely counted on strengthening himself at the expense of those who “Russian Spring” and “Russian Land Collection” support. Meanwhile, everything points to the fact that further Russian failures are caused by demons far more terrible than the alleged “bloated Lord”.

Since I started dealing with Alexander Dugin and the very concept of Eurasianism (especially the 1 in his work) I have joined the group of people wondering how crucial he is. On the 1 hand, his “Geopolitics Foundations” were to be a compulsory reading at the Russian military academy. On the another hand, the delirium about the “phallic atomic weapon, which Russian Mars is expected to defend European Venus” did not encourage Dugin to be taken besides seriously. This was besides emphasized by the Russians themselves, who, erstwhile asked or read Dugin once, made large eyes.

But they were the another Russians. Those whose precedence in life is to acquisition an flat in Moscow, not dreams of blocking the Russian flag in Odessa. The problem is that many of us have miscalculated, in estimating how many Russians there are who like Western life and want for democracy, and how many are ready for a Russian crusade to “collect Russian lands”.

If people like Dugin or Igor Striełkowa can afford to criticize “special operation”, command, defence ministry, and now even Putin himself, it could mean either that Vladimir Putin is getting weaker, or the people who warrant these people are getting stronger. In the case of Dugin himself, 1 might inactive presume that the last failure of a daughter could have made him no longer care what he could be done.

At this point, it seems that with his unconcerned attitude Putin was an ally of “hawks”. However, I am able to imagine a situation erstwhile he turns to the side of the pigeons and tells the West that the war must come to an end, and he must “get something” in order to feed it to the increasingly demanding hawks. Otherwise, it may turn out that he himself will disappear, but his place will not be taken by a pro-Western Democrat, but individual even worse than Putin himself.