The fresh concept of abroad policy is simply a fundamental act in the process of decoloning Russia, its liberation from external control.
31 March president of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin approved fresh concept abroad policy. It can no uncertainty be considered as the final chord of these changes in the geopolitical and civilizational awareness of the Russian authorities, which began 23 years ago with Putin's taking over. It is only in this current version that the doctrine of Russia's abroad policy begins to look contrasting and unambiguous. There is no ambiguity or understatement.
Complete document
It is simply a comprehensive, public programme of action of a great, sovereign, continental power announcing its view of the coming planet order, its parameters and foundations, while expressing the unbreakable will to make specified architecture, regardless of the level of conflict with those who effort hard to argue it and impose on Russia a abroad plan, including a preventive atomic attack.
The concept introduces and uses all basic terms unambiguously, consistently reflecting the explanation of the multipolar planet and the Eurasian approach to the civilizational essence of Russia. In this way, the triumph of supporters of the sovereign past of Russia was yet made in the fundamental programming strategy paper. specified a comprehensive and different clarity and consequence of the wording is undoubtedly the consequence of a war against the collective West, which entered the phase of direct, violent clash, at stake of the very existence of Russia. It is impossible to lead, and even more so to win, in specified a war without defining clear rules, regularity and positions.
Eurasian breakthrough
The fresh concept makes clear the principles that Russia accepts and agrees with. Moreover, she actually formulated it for the first time. These principles are clearly contrary to the globalist strategy, unipolarity and liberal explanation of global relations. Previously Russia sought to search compromise wordings that would reflect and will sovereignty, and compromise with the West, but now everything has changed: Russia is simply a state-world, a country-continent representing a separate civilization with its own signs, objectives, sources, values, with its unchanging and independent identity from any external force. No substance how fiercely the Russian supporters of the West and the Liberals fought their own way, it is now legally established and is the main direction of abroad policy. The opponents will either come to accept it or openly decision to the opposition.
It seems that the patriots, eurasians, supporters of the full sovereignty of civilization received the most evident and visible triumph in the full post-Soviet era on 31 March. The concept was developed in the Ministry of abroad Affairs and signed by the President. And on this structure, Russian subjectivity is now maintained; on the hard spine of full strategical sovereignty.
Need for implementation
The entry into force of specified a serious and coherent concept will require appropriate changes to the military doctrine and to the immense organisational work aimed at adapting executive authorities, as well as education and media. The safety Council should besides play its function in all of this.
The fact that the country is from now on not only to follow its own Russian road, but besides to announce it, changes everything. It no longer makes sense to mention to the West, its “rules” and “criteria”. The Globalist Liberal West itself cut off from Russia, and besides entered a direct armed conflict with it. The fresh doctrine of abroad policy only notes this situation.
At any cost
The masks have fallen down: we stand unequivocally for the multipolar world, and those who want to preserve the single-polar planet at all costs, we call them not "partners", "colleagues" or "friends", but we recognise them as enemies, against whom Russia is prepared to take a preventive atomic strike if necessary.
Thus the full image of abroad policy and processes taking place internationally has become visible, as in lens, and symmetrical. The globalist elites of the modern West do not hide that they intend to destruct Russia, overthrow and bring its leader to justice, demolish any initiatives leading towards the multipolar world. They mass-deliver weapons to the Ukrainian neo-Nazis and ignite the flame of rusophobia everywhere, assigning themselves the right to act according to their own imagination in all place of the globe.
Russia yet answers the same thing. We realize their intentions and their logic. But we reject them completely. We intend to fight for our existence and sovereignty by any means available, we are ready to fight and pay any price.
Pillars
The adopted abroad policy concept is based on a fundamental statement, announcing Russia:
– ‘a separate state-civilisation’;
– "a immense Eurasian and europacyphic power";
– the axis around which “the Russian people and another nations will unite”;
– unique kernel "cultural-civilization community of the Russian world".
That's the most crucial thing. That's the answer to the more hard question than it might seem: who are we? The consequence of specified self-determination is multipolarity, on the basis of which everything else is built. If we are dealing with civilization, it cannot be part of another civilization. So Russia is no longer part of Western civilization (as declared in erstwhile versions of abroad policy concepts), but a self-contained, sovereign non-Western civilization, or Russian world. This is the basic rule on which Russia's abroad policy will be created from now on.
Putin's Long Way
In the past 23 years Vladimir Putin has come a long way: from the first careful, though determined attempts to regain almost completely lost in 1990s sovereignty, while acknowledging that Russia (in truth, sovereign) is part of the Western world, Europe (from Lisbon to Vladivostok) and mostly shares the values, rules and principles of the West – to a complete, full confrontation with the collective West, rejecting its hegemony, refusing to recognise its values, rules and principles as universal and strictly respected by Russia.
Putin's signature under the fresh abroad policy concept of 31 March means that the journey from the sovereign state yet ended as part of a common Western liberal globalist civilization to sovereign civilization, the Russian world, and an independent pole. Russia is no longer the West. The first declared it the West itself, starting a war on demolition with us. After a year of peculiar Military Operations (SOW) we declare it too. No regrets, no dignity.
State-civilisation
This definition of Russia has 4 levels, each of which represents an highly crucial thought of abroad policy.
- The claim that Russia is simply a state of civilization means that we are dealing not with an average national state, according to the logic of the Westphalian system, but with something much more. If Russia is simply a state-civilization, then it can be compared not with a certain western country or not, but with the West as a whole. And with another civilizations, specified as China and India. Or civilizations that include many countries (Islamic world, Latin America, Africa). Civilization is not just a large state, but a kind of ancient empire, an imperial empire, a state of states. Various political actors may be in the area of the civilisation state. That, according to Konstantina Leontyeva, the flourishing diversity, not the linear unification that occurs in modern national states.
Country/continent
- At the same time, however, Russia was named "a immense Eurasian and europacyphic power", so it is simply a strong sovereign state on a continent scale. Eurasians called her ‘Continent State’. Adjective ‘Mighty’ there is no only descriptive function. They can only enjoy actual sovereignty ‘Mighty’ Power. Here we see a mention to the word "great space", which is an integral part of full strategical sovereignty. A power that does not meet this criterion cannot be truly sovereign. The Eurasian and europacyphal character of Russia means the complete designation of Eurasian geopolitics and its basic claims. Russia-Eurasia in Eurasian doctrine is an opposing concept of treating Russia as 1 of the European countries. The “power” utilized here should be considered a synonym of the Empire.
State of the Nations
- It is very crucial to remember the Russian people and another nations sharing historical, geopolitical and civilizational fates with them. The Russian nation was formed in the process of building a power from various Eastern, Ugrophyan and Turkish tribes. By building his state, the nation besides built itself. This is why the Russians' inextricably connected with their independent sovereign statehood. At the same time, it is an indication that the state was created, defended and supported by the Russian people.
The core of the Russian world
- It is very crucial to introduce the concept of "Russian world" into abroad policy. The borders of states, apart from fewer exceptions, do not coincide with the borders of civilization. usually around the boundaries established by them, there are zones of intense influence of the civilisational core. The Russian planet is simply a circumstantial historical-cultural area that coincides with Russia as a civilization, but not always part of the Russian power. In any cases, provided there are harmonious and friendly relations between countries, the Russian planet can function peacefully on different sides of the border. However, in the case of interstate conflicts, state-civilisation, which is Russia (according to the current concept of abroad policy), has all reason to defend its civilization, in utmost cases ignoring existing borders. In this way the thought of the Russian planet against the background of Russia's self-determination explains the logic of its actions in the russian area, and in peculiar gives doctrinal legitimacy and ideological justification to the russian Union. Without any longer feeling obliged to show conformism towards the global West, Moscow, in its fresh abroad policy concept, straight and clearly attacks Euro-centrism, unequivocally and in strong words rejects Western hegemony, compares the process of globalisation to a fresh installment of imperialism and colonialism. The text states that the center of humanity inevitably moves to the nonwestern regions of the planet – Asia, Eurasia, Africa, Latin America.
Justice
Inevitably, the unequal model of planet development, which over the centuries has guaranteed greater economical growth to colonial powers by taking over the resources of the dependent territories and the countries of Asia, Africa and the Western Hemisphere. The sovereignty and competitive capacity of the world's non-Western powers and leading regional powers are strengthened.
That is the essence of multipolarity. The West has not only lost its method ability to stay a global hegemon in politics, economy and industry, but has besides deprived itself of moral right to leadership.
Support for integration
"Humanity is going through a phase of revolutionary change. A fairer multipolar planet is developing". In this context, a affirmative component of Russia's programme is the further strengthening of multipolarity, active cooperation with another civilisation countries (mainly China and India), the comprehensive support of various regional integration associations and associations.
"In order to support the adaptation of planet governance to the realities of the multi-polar world, the Russian Federation intends to pay peculiar attention... to strengthening the possible and expanding the function of the global association of BRICS, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCHO), the Commonwealth of Independent States (WNP), the Eurasian economical Union (EAUG), the Organisation of the Collective safety Agreement (OUBZ), the RICH (Russia, India, China) and another interstate associations and global organisations, as well as mechanisms with a crucial engagement of Russia; to advance regional and subregional integration within friendly multilateral institutions, a dialog forum and regional unity in the Asia-Pacific region, Latin America, Africa and the mediate East; (...) constructive dialogue, partnership and common enrichment of various cultures, religions and civilizations".
Hegemonic convulsions
The planet inevitably becomes multipolar, but the old one-polar order does not intend to quit without a fight. This is the main contradiction of the modern era. It explains the sense of fundamental processes in planet politics. The problem is, as stated in the concept, that the liberal, globalist West realizes that the days of its leadership are numbered, but is not ready to admit the fresh reality, and being in agony starts furiously fighting to keep its hegemony.
This is what most conflicts in the planet can be explained, and above all, the hostile policy of the Western elite towards Russia, which has objectively become 1 of the most apparent and consistent poles in the multipolar system. The fact that Russia has declared itself a state-civilization, thus refusing to recognise the universality of the Western planet order and its rules, or the single-polar model, has become the subject of an attack on the part of the West, which formed a broad coalition of hostile countries against it and set itself the goal of depriving Russia of sovereignty.
"Recognising Russia's strengthening function as 1 of the leading centres of modern planet development, recognising its independent abroad policy as a threat to Western hegemony, The United States and their satellites have utilized measures taken by the Russian Federation to defend its vital interests in the Ukrainian direction as an excuse to tighten up the multi-annual anti-Russian policy and to launch a fresh kind of hybrid war. Its aim is to weaken Russia on a multi-level basis, including questioning its constructive function as a civilization and its military, economical and technological potential, limiting its sovereignty in abroad and interior policy, destroying territorial integrity. This Western policy began to become holistic and was enshrined on a doctrinal level.”.
Ready for anything.
In the face of this being the essence of the transition from unipolarity to multipolarity, which the West tries to hold or halt in any way, confrontation, Russia as a sovereign state-civilization, as a permanent and credible, already shaped pole of the multipolar world, declares its firm intention not to descend from the chosen course, regardless of the price it will come to pay.
“In consequence to the hostile actions of the West, Russia intends to fight for its right to be and unfettered improvement by all means”.
There is no uncertainty that this includes the right to usage against the enemy (which, under the present conditions, is the collective West, trying at all costs to keep unpolicity and prolong its hegemony), in the event of direct aggression, or even for preventive purposes, of all types of weapons, including atomic and state-of-the-art weapons. Russia is ready to go as far as it needs to go if its sovereign state and the Russian planet are in grave danger.
Belarusian sovereignty
The fresh concept besides sets out the conditions for normalising relations with Western countries, with Anglo-Saxon countries, which stand out during the current aggression with peculiar hostility towards Russia, being treated separately. The reopening of the partnership will only be possible subject to the resignation of the presently hostile Western countries and their satellites from russophobia. This is actually an ultimatum demanding from the West the acceptance of conditions of multipolarity, due to the fact that the essence of rusophobia in a geopolitical context is nothing more than a stubborn refusal of designation by the Western elites of globalistic rights to go their own way of sovereign civilization. That's all Russia is fighting for present in Ukraine. As it is known to any geopoliticist, without control over Ukraine Russia will not gain full geopolitical and civilizational sovereignty.
This is the importance of the Russian world, whose borders do not overlap with national borders, but in the context of the formation of the pole and the transition to the state of civilization of parts of it must not stay under the control of hostile geopolitical structures. They can be friendly or neutral (as shown by the Allied Belarus example) and then their national sovereignty is safe. On the contrary – then Russia is ready to act as its guarantor and to support its strengthening in the economical and military-strategic sphere. But attempts to separate parts of the Russian planet from Russia will be fought in all way. And that's what happens now.
No interference in the West
The second part of the concept of abroad policy describes concrete strategies for developing Russia's relations with the world's regions – integration of the Eurasian post-missile space, building a precedence partnership with China, India, the muslim world, Africa and Latin America. In each of these directions, priorities, directions and final objectives are identified. The attitude toward Western countries is rather tempered. However, the following can be read from the delicate diplomatic wording:
If the Western nations find their strength enough, they will emergence up and overthrow the dictatorship of the manic hegemonist elite, bringing to power those forces that will truly defend their national interests, in Russia they will have the best friend and ally. Russia, however, will not actively support and interfere with the interior processes of the political life of unfriendly countries and underlines respect for any sovereign choice made by Western societies. It is able to respond appropriately to direct confrontation with hostile powers if they exceed certain limits. But it is better for them not to exceed them.
Sovereignty inside and outside
The fresh version of the concept of abroad policy is besides an essential act in the process of decolonising Russia itself, its liberation from external control.
If we take the content seriously, we should already adapt to it the activities of the Ministry of abroad Affairs, the basic academic units (most notably the Moscow State Institute of global Relations, where another paradigms dominate so far), improvement Rosso-difficultism, the Russian World, support fresh forms of public diplomacy recognising Russia as a sovereign civilization specified as the global Rusophil Movement (MRR).
However, recognising Russia as a state-civilisation is besides crucial for interior policy. After all, 1 must not act like a state-civilization in abroad policy, in interior politics, while remaining, even sovereign, part of a liberal, Western-oriented system, accepting its concepts, values and principles. abroad policy is always closely linked to interior policy. In this area, Russia will gotta undertake major and deep reforms in the close future to defend its sovereignty. We already have, we can boldly say, a sovereign abroad policy, but the necessity of a sovereign interior policy must only be realised.
Prof. Aleksandr Dugin
Source: КОНЦЕПЦИЯ ВНЕШНЕЙ ПОЛИТИКИ, КАК АПОФЕОЗ И КАТЕХИЗИС сайт сайт Института Института (katehon.com)
