Will you perceive to vampire advice and avoid the sun?

Strangely enough, whenever I effort to take a closer look at any medical recommendations by checking and analyzing sources, these recommendations may prove unfounded, taken from the air, arbitrary, powerfully stretched or simply wrong.

I wrote these words in the introduction to the text on WHO recommendations on optimal BMI (Here.). Now, another example. The heat period has begun, the holidays are approaching, so from all media outlets a stream of warnings begins to flow: solar radiation is dangerous, deadly, you gotta defend yourself from it. And this is not about the apparent for all regulation of avoiding sunburn or stroke and reasonably adapting our behaviour to the requirements of our skin. It's not about reason and moderation. This is about absolute and complete avoidance of even minimal contact with deadly radiation. Well, dermatologists have found themselves in the fresh lucrative function of human defenders against cancer, and they will never let go. On the “only official” website you can find material that then goes to the media uncritically copied by alleged journalists, so let's read at the source, that is: https://www.academiaczaniaka.org/

We will find here a guide to the patient, due to the fact that for them we are all patients, even erstwhile we do not know yet, companyed by 2 highly serious institutions:

• National Cancer Institute of United States

• Klinika Nowotworów Tkanek Mękkich, Kości i Czerniaków Centrum Oncologii — MCS Institute in Warsaw

The very presence of the American institute among sponsors should increase our skepticism, as the US is the most profitable country at the expense of the patient's healthcare in the world, but let's leave it for a while. The skin cancer we're expected to defend ourselves from is not named here, but it's about the melanoma they're dedicated to this portal and the full campaign. This is the only skin cancer to be feared due to the fact that others are mild or very rare. That's most likely why melanoma comes by name in the name of the Clinic.

As the guide teaches us:

1.5. Prevention

The best way to prevent skin cancer is to defend young children from the sun. Doctors propose that people of all ages should limit sun vulnerability and avoid another sources of UV radiation, including:

• avoid the sun in the afternoon until late afternoon if possible. defend yourself from UV radiation, which is reflected by sand, water, snow and ice. UV radiation can penetrate through light clothing, car windows, windows and clouds,

• wear long sleeves and long trousers of dense weave fabrics, hats with wide roundabout and sunglasses that absorb UV rays,

• usage filter creams. Sunscreen creams - at least 15 - can aid prevent skin cancer, especially those operating on a wide spectrum of radiation (UVA and UVB radiation) and utilized regularly during the day. But you inactive gotta avoid the sun and wear the right clothes to defend your skin,

• Stay distant from solariums

And all these are recommendations for us, the people of Poland, a country lying in the mediate latitudes, where even in the mediate of the summertime we have not much. Each of us, like a vampire, will immediately ignite and turn to dust as shortly as the merciless rays of the Death Star lick his unprotected body. In the light of our experience and everyday observations, the above recommendations are absolutely absurd. I'm certain there's a point to this book. That's it. average everyday cognition and life experience indicate that people who do not avoid the sun are much better, have more energy, sleep better and are little ill. The children of “In the basement chamber” were not overly healthy. So immediately, even before looking at the results of various studies based on our life cognition and common sense, we can express any doubts.

If the Sun is indeed the star of death, whose deadly rays destruct all surviving things, then how on Earth could life have arisen and evolved under these rays. possibly it's adjusted. How did man evolve in the sun’s rays (originally in Africa), the same 1 who now has to defend himself from them? A fewer decades ago, no 1 always heard of sunscreens. How did mankind survive?

The second uncertainty is based on information made available in press material. As many as 75% of the radiation we receive as a child, however, the same origin says that melanoma cases happen in people aged 50 or 60. Additionally, from various another sources, we can learn that the complete replacement of human skin cells occurs within a fewer weeks. Then how? erstwhile on the radio, I heard a prof. learn how she told me that skin had memory, but she didn't tell me what that memory would depend on, what is her biological mechanism? The journalist, of course, did not ask. possibly it's the latest trendy memory in the cloud. This has late been the practice of the media, journalists uncritically accept the authoritative communicative of expert stories, especially doctors, without daring to ask them troublesome questions. Or possibly they can't?

Also the 3rd doubt. They keep us informed of the steady increase in melanoma. This is the case despite many campaigns to avoid the sun, mass usage of sunscreens with filters, and progressing regardless of the vocations of lifestyle changes and work leading to a limitation of sun exposure. Even farmers now work in the field, frequently sitting in their tractor or harvester’s protective cabin. We get little exposure, and the illness grows. Why?

Interestingly, melanomas frequently appear in people in places where the sun does not come. How is all of this related to the alleged causal relationship?

More than a 4th of a century ago, the results of the survey indicated that the hypothesis of causing melanoma by solar radiation should be approached with caution. [1, 2]. In Lancet magazine review work [2] discussing the results of erstwhile studies we can read:

Sunlight is the main environmental origin of most skin melanomas. vulnerability to intense ultraviolet pulses, especially in childhood, begins the transformation of benign melanocytes into malignant phenotypes. Paradoxically, outdoors have a lower hazard of melanoma than indoors, suggesting that chronic vulnerability to sunlight may have protective effects. In addition, any melanomas form in areas exposed to the sun; other. Although any melanocytes are formed from pre-existing melanocytes, many are formed de novo. These observations propose that melanoma originates from multiple pathways, with factors that initiate and advance improvement being different for each of them.

After a more detailed look, it is clear that all this sound has a weak support in the facts. In addition, it may be that we are allegedly protecting ourselves by expanding our exposure. At work [3] published in the diary of the National Cancer Institute we have a short and exceptionally clear for the publication of the medical conclusion:

The authors of the work propose 2 hypothetical protection mechanisms, 1 of which is action related to vitamin D synthesis, and another would trust on the influence of solar radiation on the ability to repair DNA. Like the reflection data themselves, both hypotheses have nothing to do with the alleged killing of solar radiation. In fact-based science, paradoxes point to the misconception of a hypothesis that should be rejected and replaced by a better hypothesis. Anyway, mentioned in the work passage cited above [2] ‘paradox’ immediately ceases to be a ‘paradox’ if it is assumed that solar radiation is not the origin of melanoma. What is more, the recorded increase in the incidences of falling vulnerability of the population to the sun may propose something rather opposite, or shortages of sunlight as a possible origin of melanoma.

However, it turns out that the alleged increase in melanoma is mostly due to the actions of the doctors themselves, who, especially in rich countries with highly commercialised wellness care specified as the US and the United Kingdom, have aired a fresh origin of lucrative procedures. At work [4] published in the British diary of Dermatology and poetically entitled “Epidemia melanoma: a dream of summertime night?” the conclusions read:

Therefore, we conclude that a large increase in reported incidence is likely due to a diagnostic drift that Classifies mild skin lesions as grade 1 melanoma. This conclusion can be confirmed by a direct comparison of the histology of contemporary and past histological samples. The location of the reported changes did not correspond to the locations of the changes due to sun exposure. These discoveries should prompt reconsidering treatment of “early” lesions, seeking better diagnostic methods to separate them from actually malignant melanomas, re-assessment of the function of ultraviolet radiation and recommendations for protection against itand needs a fresh direction in search of the origin of melanoma.

Additional details and supporting the above conclusions are given in the comments of another authors published later [5]. Despite the alleged increase in incidences, the number of serious cases of melanoma and resulting deaths does not increase, which is consistent with the logic of the above works, that this observed increase is due to a ‘diagnostic drift’, that is, to interpret mild skin lesions as early melanoma cases. Of course, doctors may be inclined to take credit and talk about increased healing in relation to increased illness. In reality, however, only a decrease in the number of deaths per 100,000 people can be attributed to the illustration from 2012 to 2020. This mention to the top line, or "number of fresh cases" in the light of the work cited, is an abuse.

However, there is no area for uncertainty for physicians and journalists conducting a major media run to avoid sunlight. We must all avoid the sun absolutely and at all costs. And this price in the form of serious wellness harm can be very high.

The benefits of vulnerability to sunlight are many. About vitamin D and possibly melatonin, everyone has heard, but here there is simply a temptation to admit by any that ‘risky’ vulnerability to deadly sun can be effectively replaced by ‘safe’ supplementation. This is not entirely true, there is simply a question of assimilation and activation on the way of different metabolic pathways, so supplementation cannot full replace solar rays. Vitamin D (actually it's a hormone) occurs in the body in respective forms transformed by different organs from any forms to others. Its function is besides not limited to regulating the calcium economy, it has an crucial function in many immune mechanisms, DNA repair, etc. The effects of vulnerability to the sun, which authors are willing to attribute to vitamin D, in case of cancer, are described in the work [6]:

Women with higher vulnerability to UVB solar radiation had a halving lower incidence of breast cancer than women with lower vulnerability to sun.

[...]

Men with greater vulnerability to the sun in their apartments had only half the rate of morbidity to fatal prostate cancer.

These cancers kill more than 10 times as many people as melanoma. How, then, is the possible of reducing them by half due to the sun’s questionable protection from melanoma by avoiding it? In the light of these data, what is the point of the recommendations from the abovementioned guide? In addition, there are many indications that anticancer and mostly pro-health effects of the sun are not only vitamin D itself, so supplementation will not replace it.

For example, an increase in nitric oxide production, which has a beneficial effect on the cardiovascular system, is simply a known sun effect. [7]. Solar vulnerability is known to have protective effects in the event of respiratory diseases. Work can be found on benefits for patients with dementia or irritable bowel syndrome. However, many benefits and mechanisms of sunlight on the skin and the full human body stay unexplored so far. The reason is simple, specified action cannot be patented, it cannot become a origin of profit, so it is not worth examining. In addition, these benefits can reduce request for paid medicine. At the end of boredom of readers, only 1 work will be cited [8]where the impact of solar baths on the life expectancy of Swedish women has been studied. It is worth remembering the results of this study:

In the light of the above investigation results, it can be concluded with large certainty that the full anti-Normal campaign, together with the categorical recommendations to avoid solar radiation, is an unwarranted invention, and their actions are harmful, even dangerous to health. Here is the question of the intent of specified action. The general answer is simple: money, large money. wellness care in developed countries is simply a commercial strategy of large players. They are mainly global pharmaceutical companies, but besides various financial institutions, insurers, besides state companies. To the strategy we are all a origin of income and nothing more. The best origin is individual sick adequate to gotta constantly usage drugs and procedures, but healthy adequate to live a comparatively long time and work for it all. perfect are cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, osteoporosis, depression and many another chronic diseases, treated for years, but which for any reason modern medicine cannot cure. Treatment as long as possible and not healing is now the goal of medicine, as treatment gives profits and healing causes failure of client. This has been described by many authors, for example in books [9, 10].

And that's where it comes from. A akin mechanics was presented in a series of lyrics on HPV vaccination, describing how Merck introduced Gardasil (Here.) doubtful efficiency and a serious safety profile. The first phase of marketplace building for a fresh product is the creation of a “disease awareness” in society. Everyone needs to know that there is simply a life-threatening situation that fewer have always heard of before, and only modern medicine and constant alertness can prevent. Then, erstwhile everyone has been intimidated and demanded enough, the strategy offers a solution. In this case, they are continuous checks on the condition of the skin and removal and histological examination, even tiny marks and skin changes, of which the average man has a lot, especially for old years. Of course, modern, or more costly methods are preferred. The cost of these treatments in the United States in 2012 exceeded $2 billion [9]. Additionally, the marketplace for creams with filter and various another ointments is growing. We in Poland, of course, meekly copy U.S. solutions on our local scale, due to the fact that there should not be countries that are the control group, in which despite not complying with the recommendations, patients are doing well. The fact that the promotion of sun avoidance will consequence in a general decrease in wellness levels and an increase in the number of chronically sick people, does not disturb anything, and even drives the interests of the industry.

Of course, it should not be assumed that all doctors are active in a conspiracy. Rather, they perceive uncritically to authority, and force can be great. For example, companies introducing a fresh product: medicine, vaccine or medical procedure, in addition to the registration procedure, lead to promotion. “Combined” and “received” are alleged key opinion leaders, i.e. individuals with authority and influence, medical professors, wellness officials, etc. Medical journals print articles written by corporate ghostwriters, but signed by medical authorities who get quite a few money for it. Conferences and trainings financed by companies are held. authoritative institutions issue authoritative guidance. Very well described by Peter Gotzsche's Polish book [10]. This is all to guarantee that doctors have no uncertainty about giving recommendations to patients or prescribing medication. Where the marketplace has strengthened and become great, the stick and carrot method works effectively. Doctors who follow the recommendations have various financial incentives, but for opposing authoritative narrative, they can be hailed as a mass murderer or even lose their right to prosecute a profession. This is the case in the United States, for example. The planet value of sales of statins in 2022 reached $14.9 billion, so it is hard to be amazed by the pressure. Fortunately, the melanoma marketplace is inactive growing, so We can usage the sun for a while. In addition to vaccine passports and akin methods of forcing actions "for our sake" there are projects to monitor our behaviour (this will enable us to do this, for example, 5G phones) and punish us as those officially recognised by experts as harmful to our health. First, by expanding insurance costs. The European Commission and the WHO are reasoning about this.

By the way, it is worth mentioning that promoted as healthy new-fashion eating habits can unnaturally increase skin sensitivity to the sun. For example, replacing animal fats by supposedly healthy plant oils results in an excess of omega-6 fatty acids and skin sensitivity to the sun. any medicines may besides origin this hypersensitivity. In addition, cholesterol lowering medicines further impair the synthesis of many hormones, including vitamin production D through the skin under the sun. And besides note the possible ‘dosage’ of vitamin D. In case of supplementation, it is absolutely crucial to remember the parallel supplementation with vitamin K2. The alleged symptoms of excess vitamin D3 are de facto Signs of K2 deficiency. erstwhile the sun is the source, it is besides worth providing vitamin K2, for example by eating silage and various cheeses.

In addition to the wellness impact, which has been explained, there is inactive a cosmetic aspect. Solar radiation is reported to accelerate skin aging. There are besides various cosmetologists and cosmetologists in 1 choir with doctors. To prove it, they usually show us an old shepherd who grazed sheep in the hall for decades. That's impressive, but for balance, let's look at people of different ages around us. Is it truly that easy to tell who was hiding from the sun and who was not? Not necessarily, so this effect is at least ambiguous for us. A much greater effect on the wellness and behaviour of skin youth is coenzym Q10, and not the 1 administered externally in various costly lubricants, but the 1 actually available to the skin, i.e. circulating in our body. You request to know that commonly utilized statins in addition to blocking cholesterol synthesis pathways in the body, which is already in itself harmful to the wellness of the skin and man in general, besides block the synthesis of CoQ10. Degradation of this synthesis causes serious adverse wellness effects, accelerates aging, and is frequently seen as premature skin aging. However, this does not prevent us from prescribing statins widely.

So let's usage the sun while we're inactive allowed.

[1] Melanoma and sun exposure: An overview of published studies, Mark Elwood, Janet Jopson, Int. J. Cancer: 73, 198–203 (1997),

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971009)73:2%3C198::AID-IJC6%3E3.0.0.CO;2-R

[2] Is there more than 1 road to melanoma?, Jason K Rivers, Lancet 2004; 363: 728–30

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15649-3

[3] Sun vulnerability and Mortality From Melanoma, Marianne Berwick, Bruce K. Armstrong, Leah Ben-Porat, Judith Fine, Anne Kricker, Carey Eberle, Raymond Barnhill, diary of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 97, No. 3, February 2, 2005

https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji019

[4] Melanoma epidemic: a midmmer night’s dream?, N.J. Levell, C.C. Beattie, S. Shuster and D.C. Greenberg, British diary of Dermatology, Volume 161, Issue 3, 1 September 2009, Pages 630–634

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09299.x

[5] Iatrogenic melanoma. Comment on: Melanoma epidemic: a midmmer night’s dream? J.I. Van Der Rhee, W.J. Mooi, N.A. Kukutsch, F.A. De Snoo, W. Bergman, British diary of Dermatology, Volume 162, Issue 2, 1 February 2010, Pages 457–458,

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09556.x

Jatrogenic or illness resulting from treatment

[6] Vitamin D for cancer prevention: global perspective, Cedric F Garland, Edward D Gorham, Sharif B Mohr, Frank C Garland, Ann Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;19(7):468-83.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.021

[7] Sunlight Has Cardiovascular Benefits Independently of Vitamin D, Richard B Weller, Blood Purif. 2016; 41(1-3):130-4.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000441266

[8] Avoidance of sun vulnerability as a hazard origin for major cases of death: a competitive hazard analysis of the Melanoma in confederate Sweden cohort, P G Lindqvist, E Epstein, K Nielsen, M Landin-Olsson, C Ingvar, H Olsson, J Intern Med. 2016 Oct;280(4):375-87\

https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12496

[9] Robert Yoho, MD, Butchered by "Healthcare": What to Do About Doctors, large Pharma, and Corrupt Government Ruining Your wellness and Medical Care.

https://www.amazon.pl/Butchered-Healthcare-Doctors-Corrupt-Government/dp/1735485748/

https://lubyczytac.pl/Xiazka/5024575/butchered-by-quot-healthcare-quot-what-to-do-about-doctors-big-pharma-and-corrupt-government

[10] Killer medicines and organized crime, which is how pharmaceutical companies destruct healthcare, Peter Gotzsche

https://www.taniaksiazka.pl/killing-medicine-and-organized-crime-meaning-how-concer-pharmaceutical-destructive-care-health-peter-gotzsche-p-585296.html

https://bonito.pl/product/lethal-medicine-and-organised-crime-meaning-how-concer-pharmaceutical-destructive-care-health-2