The LGBT deviant threatened to massacre the students. The media is silent

United Kingdom Sentence passed on the 21-year-old alleged "transgender activist" who sent threats to 3 schools for girls. The court sentenced him to prison for messages containing threats of murdering students. The issue itself should give emergence to a broad debate on radicalisation, force and kid safety. Instead, any media and activist environments seem to do everything to make the subject vanish from public space as shortly as possible, for the sake of genderism, of course.

The LGBT deviant Darren Rigby sent e-mails to 3 British schools for girls, threatening to “shoot and slaughter all the girls” in revenge for alleged “pressing” by these institutions “trans woman”. It was due to the fact that schools refused to accept mentally sick men as women. His trial, in which he was sentenced to 2 years and 4 months of ruthless imprisonment, just ended. This time the British justice strategy worked properly. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said of the media there that silenced the matter.

It is not a secret that in fresh years a circumstantial strategy of ideological protection has been created around the issue of genderism-neolysenkoism. In practice, this means that any facts are publicised and others are marginalized or silenced. erstwhile a criminal represents an environment considered politically inappropriate, his views, statements and motivations are analysed in item by the media. However, erstwhile the case concerns a individual related to transgender traffic, abruptly there is caution, avoiding uncomfortable questions and attempting to present an incidental as an incidental without a wider context.

However, the context is important, but not due to the fact that the work for the actions of 1 individual is borne by a full group of people, but due to the fact that all ideology and all social movement should be subject to the same assessment. If media and activist organisations request peculiar treatment for their own environment, they actually undermine the rule of equality they so frequently invoke. erstwhile again, then, hypocrisy, typical of leftist movements.

Even more worrying are the attempts to silence critics. In many Western countries, those asking questions about the demands of the perverts and sex offenders movement are accused of hatred, discrimination or “spreading prejudice”. specified a strategy has a simple purpose: to discourage people from publically expressing their doubts about the absurd ideology of neolysenkoism. As a result, less and less people dare talk openly about problems that were the subject of a average debate a fewer years ago.

Threats to British students show where specified an atmosphere leads. alternatively of talking about facts, there is an instinct to defend the image of a peculiar environment, for political reasons. The most crucial thing is not what happened, but how the event will affect the propaganda communicative only of the right left. In this way, the victims go to the background, and the precedence is to control the transmission.

Serious society in a average country cannot function on the basis of a catalogue of prohibited topics. If an ideology is right, it should withstand criticism, and if a social movement works honestly, it should not be afraid of hard questions. Attempts to silence uncomfortable facts are a sign of weakness of arguments, not their strength. They are besides a sign of building a totalitarian system, with typical censorship.

The most crucial conclusion in this case should be to reject double standards. Left-wing violence, threats and intimidation must be powerfully condemned and combated. Moreover, all ideology, organisation or environment should be subject to identical assessment rules, without making systemic exceptions to the absurd ideas of the utmost left. Otherwise freedom of speech becomes an empty slogan, and public debate turns into a tool to defend selected groups (Jews, sexual deviants, immigrants) from completely right criticism.

The public has a right to know the facts. He besides has the right to discuss their importance without fear of stigmatisation. Any effort to hide uncomfortable information in the name of political correctness harms not only fact but besides trust in the media and public institutions. Since the Left loves democracy and freedom of speech so much, let it yet start to respect it, not to treat it selectively.

Photo: sex deviant Darren Rigby.

We besides recommend: Ukrainian drone exploded in NATO port