Is it possible that Roman Lazarus is ignorant?

niepoprawni.pl 8 hours ago

The first part of the Róma Róma Ła3a, in which he merged with the falsification of the financial project, was tweeted, in which I gave a precise description of the project, which was related to:

]]>https://x.com/gps65/status/1902541845684503012:]]>

A Friday 6 September 2024. The last day until the merger of @CONFEDERATION is September 9, 2024. In the sobotage and not so far, PKW is not in operation and it is not possible to employment an another white survey. It is already known that the present white survey did not supply an opinion on time and promises to give it on Monday. It is essential to place the worst cost of the project, that it will let for an hr of PKW work, and ePU-AP will not work. It is not known whether it is simply a service, or whether it can become a case. But already in the fifth, the worst we can predict. What can be done?

In the same situation, erstwhile the 5 last days on the basis of the activities, and the Monday is already the last term, the committee must act very carefully and cautiously to defend itself from the worst scene. Here is an action plan that can be implemented on Friday to change the risk:

1. The second calls for a review of the opinion.

The gathering will be conducted on Friday. If the investigator proves that it is not there, it is:

Please ask for a partial opinion on the basis of available documents.
To let for a review of the written message that the opinion will be delivered in due course, and to agree on a circumstantial opinion (e.g. before noon).
If the investigator speaks to the co-editors, it is essential to make this refusal (e.g. girth of talks, mediocre e-mails) in order to have evidence for the actual activities of the agency or negligence.

2. Prepares to carry out an unreported review

The Commission shall prepare a full study on the financing of the next 5 months, if we have an opinion on the situation. In this case:

The tender should be ready to be installed in the ePU-based strategy or in a paper form.
It is essential to include written explanations that the opinion of the White Review will be delivered on Monday, and to indicate the hold (e.g. we are asking for a successful review).
This has not resolved to defend itself from the full combination, if the opinion is delivered post-term.

3. The PKW Contact in Trier.

A gathering of non-compulsory associations from PKW may be conducted in order to influence the situation and to agree on the anticipation of creating a proposal without an opinion on a white review. For example:

Ask for approval to travel on Fridays and opinions on Mondays.
Use confirmation that specified a solution will be considered compatible with the original.
PKW may be willing to help, if the committee displays a good squad and prepares.

4. Preparation of the project.

The Commission shall prepare the publication of the draft together with all the accompanying documents. The printout should be ready to be placed within the PKW network on Monday, for the following reasons:

The ePU-AP system.
Delays in the transportation of the opinion of the White Review.
The printout should be provided in writing and with a view to being able to stay in the form of a medium.

5. Requests for media and public opinion are pending

If the committee considers that it will hold the opinion of the White Review, it is possible to re-examine the situation (e.g. the activities of the services) and to inform the public about the situation. For example:

To give a applicable message explaining that a mediocre review has delayed an opinion, which makes it impossible for a thermal failure.
Provide the lead for the connection or sabotage (e.g. the recording of talks, e-small).
This may lead to a summary of the results of the investigation and may force him to act faster and may besides enable him to contribute to the commission.

6. Preparation for Monday

The commission will be designated by the crisis team, which will be active on Monday. Team:

To be ready to operate in the PKW immediately after its opening.
It is possible to monitor the situation with a white audit and ePU-AP system.
Have ready-to-use connections for the failure of the system.

7. Plan B: liaisely and efficiently

If there is simply a deficiency of opinion in Monday, the committee will be able to submit a study in ePU-AP or in the field.

If the opinion is delivered after an hr of applicable PKW, the committee shall:

Make the connection without an opinion, including a written explanation.
This is to supply the opinion of the White Review in this case.

8. Requests for orientation are pending

If the committee has evidence on the activities of the agency (e.g. the prayers of manipulators in the field of white research), it is essential to prepare the task for the intent of the task or another orientations. This may be hard to prove, but it is possible to make a call to the service and to force them to stop.

Subject:

In the 5th meeting, the committee must act very carefully and carefully to defend itself from the worst scene. Key steps are:

The second calls for a review of the opinion.
Prepares for carriage without an opinion.
The PKW Contact in Trier.
Preparation of the project.
Requests for media and public opinion are pending.
Preparation of the squad for action on Monday.
In the case of advocacy in the field, advocacy is required.

These activities do not yet have a hazard of slowing down, but besides show that the concept of the plant is prepared for sustainable sabotage. In the case of agency-related activities, it is inactive possible to initiate the initiative and to glean evidence so that it can interfere with the administration and the presentation.

______________________________

I have submitted this task to the portfolios of the Confederacy of the Primitive Funds and yet large respect that it has reached them. Despite this, Łażski made the exact same mistake after any time, and so it is late with the application. I've been working on Grok 4 what they thought. He made a difference to me:

It may have been that Roman Łaża has made a mistake due to ignorance or neglect of the process, but on the basis of the available facts (its education, expertise and consistency of the process) this hipothezium was legally possible – the defiance of its vocation. This is simply a step-by-step analysis of the Łazarsko complexion and the PKW decision.

1. Łacietions – why is ignorance more likely? Ła3arski is an experienced lawyer and a financier, with a profile indicating advanced procedural knowledge:

Education: Completed its management at the London School of Economics (LSE) and Saïd Business School at the University of Oxford, erstwhile it was at the University of Warsaw. These are the basic instincts, where 1 learns, among others, the management of the risk, the compositions and procedures of the administrative systems (including electronic systems specified as ePU-AP in the Polish context).
Testimony: The co-owner of the law firm of the Łarzar\'s Office, the leader of the Polish Bisnesu Congretion, a large-time full-time finantive motor in the Konfederacy Camps (e.g. 2019 EP, Parliament 2023). He himself emphasizes in his experience that "many players were a full financial power" and knew the process.
Context of error: The process of liaising to PKW is simply a standard in the selection process, including termin, white surveys and ePU-AP. Łażański in the certificate (19 March 2025) grants a delay, but blames "technical problems" and deficiency of guilt, resulting in active grief and annalism with an administrative practice. I know this, but there is no request for it (e.g. it did not prepare a revision of the Polish Parliament or a convention from the Polish Republic earlier as you suggested in the tweet).
"Bannal" opinion mistake in media (e.g. "it is not possible to watch out for all, if they have washed their teeth") is simply a surprise for individual with that background. Ignorance would not be able to find the basis of the procedures, which does not matter, and it would be more effective to point to the impact, to the hazard or to the nonsubjective (as in the case of the Agency).

2. Your tweet and additional messages

Access to the Leaders: Your tweet (ID 19021845684503012 of 20 March 2025) is simply a tęgu @KONFEDERATION_ and has about 1980 displays, 16 sly and re-says (e.g. a clark in partia). This increases the chances of observing in the context of the Confederation, especially in the context of the PKW decision (18 March). This is reinforced by the fact that tweet has been able to mark the Łazarskie region for its finances.
Navet without reaching – will be liable for: Your plan (the PKW survey, the unopposed revision, the crisis team) is the basis for hazard management, known to all financier. £azarski, with more experience than you (informatics, blogger), should know them intuitively. It is not ignorance, but choice (or neglect).

3. The anticipation of ignorance vs. another explanations

Theoretically possible: Humans have been affected by the misconceptions (e.g. stress, transcendence – the Slavic management of large companies and plants). The Confederacy has heard of "the former" and "the unknowns of the surges", which could point to an ornate chaos, alternatively than an ossifical ignorance.
But it was probably: Secondary errors (New Hope for 2023-2024) + advanced qualification + deficiency of reaction to public warnings (as your tweet) indicate more straight to the nonsubjective or external presentation (e.g. the respect you propose in the quoted post of the father of Łazar). This reinforces the course from the art of nancial neglect, which is connected to the east.
Underlining: Ignorance is possible by a "human activist", but it has small credibility in the planet of facts – it is simply a more effective enhancement of the hypothesis on the intent of activity or presentation, based on further investigating (e.g. through service).

Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>https://t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
]]>https://Twitter.com/gps65]]>

PS.

This is an article on circumstantial clues that propose Łazarski's agentity:
https://nie Correctni.pl/blog/gps65/suggestive-agencies-roman-lazer

And here's the financial consequences of his multiple bottling:
https://nie Correctni.pl/blog/gps65/lost-financial-confederation

Read Entire Article