"Aleksei, we will never forget you, we will never forgive them" – specified a full cabotine and non-political entry was posted after the death of Navalny Donald Tusk. Simon Holovnia, who shouted at the 3rd Way Convention about “putin's dent into the ground,” was even more curiosive.
The case of Szymon Holownia is peculiarly worrying, due to the fact that this 1 created by the media, the salon and... who? – the politician – has ambitions to become the president of Poland, in which unfortunately it is supported by the leader of PSL. However, Holowna's fresh statements, as well as his behaviour, let us to conclude that we are dealing with a policy that is not serious, which does not give emergence to the highest position in Poland.
Luke Warches So he commented on Holowna's words: "One more time to realize the seriousness of the situation: Mr Simon, the erstwhile tv head, did not realize that it was no longer "I have talent" and that he is now liable for the state and its citizens. No, we will not "bring Putin into the ground." It is in Poland's interest that we should never be affected by armed actions, even if the price is, for example, the territorial integrity of Ukraine. You want to push Putin into the ground, Mr. Hołownia – the freeway. Apply a ticket and run as a private individual to Ukraine. There on the front they request games.”
But this case besides has a second bottom. These hysterical reactions of the western establishment on the 1 hand attest to the emotional tension in which he lives, on the another hand, that Navalny was an crucial card in the game for the West, even though he was a Russian nationalist. Although his nationalism has been silenced in fresh years, no 1 truly knew whether tactically or how he wanted to convince himself Paweł KowalNawalny just changed his mind. Something like Michał Kamiński or Roman Gierty, who from nationalism in utmost form (first in the NOP, second in the Youth of the All-Polish AD 1989), came to the current function of the paputchiki alleged liberal democracy. Was he wasted on that road, too? We'll most likely never know.
The tears of the West contrast either with the silence or with the joy of many Ukrainians who felt that the death of Navalny was “good news”, for “one kacapa less”. The West seemed to have hoped that Navalny might be Russia’s leader in any future. And then what would happen? He would most likely like to talk to the “democratic” Russia of Navalny, and specified a position does not grin to Kiev, there he prefers Putin, due to the fact that it guarantees that Ukraine is first. Well, let's presume that Navalny or individual like him is in charge of Russia – and what then? Would Ukraine inactive be crucial to the West, or would Russia, with its military and economical potential, as a possible ally, for example, in a confrontation with China? The question is rhetorical. Then Ukraine would gotta rapidly fold its programme to fight Russia wherever possible – to fight language, culture and history. Neo-Bander-style Rusophobia would have been passe.
Would a “democratic” Russian leader sale inexpensive skin? Would he agree to surrender the Crimea or to return to Russia Georg Soros and his foundation to the LGBT agenda? We don't know, but I'm certain the West would want the era to come back when, as he said triumphantly Zbigniew Brzeziński, “They do what we want.” It was about the crews. Boris Jelcin. Would he have been swamped with a fresh Yeltsin, or would he have returned to his first ideas? In any case, the current authorities in Kiev are rather right to fear that “democratic” Russia is besides Russia, even more dangerous, due to the fact that it is reconciled with the West.
The union of Naval with the oligarchical establishment in Russia is not subject to discussion, it is unclear who pushed him into an open fight with Vladimir Putin, who financed and supported him. Was it the "Litvinenko 2.0" project? We don't know, but it's not possible that Navalny has no powerful protectors. Like what? We'll most likely find out someday. Litvinenko was a naive young man, a tool Boris BierezowskiAnd then the CIA and British services. He was a pawn on a large chess board, and he seemed to have been much more serious, but individual pushed him under the wheels of a speeding train. He may have been a card in the game in the hands of the current government of power in the Kremlin, but preferred to become a card in the hands of the West.
Jan Engelgard
photo of wikipedia
