On 24 August, Przemysław Czarnek criticized TVP in liquidation for the full broadcast of the Warsaw independency Day celebrations of Ukraine and the political umbrella of Rafał Trzaskowski over the event. Celebrations were held in Castle Square at 6 p.m. The dispute shows the essential thing: solidarity with Ukraine cannot displace the Polish state measure.
Transmission dispute and patronage
Przemysław Czarnek reacted to the way TVP reported Warsaw independency Day celebrations of Ukraine in liquidation. According to Information To the Things of the politician he criticized the full transmission of the event and the function of Rafał Trzaskowski, who took the patronage celebration as president of Warsaw. This isn't just a tiny frame fight. This is simply a dispute over whether public institutions in Poland remember who they are primarily meant to serve.
According to the Legal Gazette, the ceremony was planned on August 24 at Castle Square, under the slogan “Independence. Ours together." The organizers were the Euromaidan Warsaw initiative and the Stand With Ukraine Foundation, and the program included speeches by Ukrainian soldiers, a minute of silence, the presentation of Stand With Ukraine Awards and concerts. PCh24 reported in turn that the event was taking place under the patronage of Rafał Trzaskowski.
Public tv is not individual else's agenda
Ukraine defends itself against Russian imperialism and Poland has an interest in Russia not moving its force closer to our borders. That's a fact. But equally actual is that Polish public media, even put into liquidation, should not lose state instinct. Reporting the event is 1 thing. Building a full frame around it, without a visible Polish filter of national interest, is simply a political decision.
That's the stakes. Poles have the right to anticipate that in Warsaw, the capital of the Republic, the hierarchy of symbols will be clear. Helping a neighbour does. Gratitude to those Ukrainians who fight Russia, too. But Polish public space cannot be managed as if all question about costs, memory and proportions was something embarrassing. This is simply a Polish state, not a studio from strengthening another people's messages.
Trzaskowski picks a gesture, the right asks for proportions
Rafał Trzaskowski has for years been building the image of a self-government open to symbolic gestures, usually consistent with the liberal thought of the politics of large cities. The National diary has already written about it on the occasion political race for young votersin which the president of Warsaw is happy to side with the spectacular politics of emotion. The patronage over the Ukrainian vacation follows this pattern.
The problem is not that Ukrainians in Poland want to celebrate their own holiday. They have the right to do so if the event takes place calmly and legally. The problem begins erstwhile the Polish municipal authority and public media give this rank, which makes us ask where the Polish bill is in this arrangement. Warsaw is not just a stage. Warsaw is simply a symbol of Polish statehood.
Black, regardless of the sharpness of his own style, so he touched the real nerve. In the background, there is simply a question of the media, which, after political change, would supposedly regain standards, and in practice frequently operate according to the fresh expectations of the camp of power. On matters relating to Indigenous Black It's easy to put a fight patch on. It is harder to answer why the Polish viewer is to receive a message in which critical questions about Ukraine are treated as political inappropriateness.
Solidarity without abdication from Polishness
The most honest Polish position is simple. Russia remains a threat and Ukraine fighting Russian aggression is an crucial safety buffer for Warsaw. but the alliance doesn't mean giving up your own memory, your own money and your own priorities. A country which cannot say yes but in Polish is rapidly brought to the function of the back office.
Therefore, criticism of transmission and patronage makes sense more than 1 celebration in Castle Square. The question is whether Polish institutions can keep proportions during the war beyond the east border. Whether they see the difference between aid and submission. Do they remember that all symbolic decision translates into a real sense of the origin of citizens.
The Polish right is not obliged to apologize for questions about Polish business. He has a work to make them loud. If tv financed from the Polish legal order recounts another's state vacation with momentum, the viewer has the right to ask where is akin concern about Polish memory, Polish anniversaries and Polish voice in dispute with Kiev. Without these questions, solidarity becomes an empty ritual.
Source: To Things, Legal Gazette, PCh24.
Source: To Things
