September 1939 for those who survived this day (in literal significance) was any beginning of “new” and the end of “old”. As you could hear later: “before war and after war”. 2 worlds diametrically different. For many that end not only their lives, but their lives as such. For many – not excluded – the eternal end of childhood at the age of 8. From that memorable day, the demolition of Poland began with the difficulty of raising after the partitions. Germany consistently and methodically – murdering about 6 million Polish citizens – prepared the remainder for a servitude function towards the “race of masters”. The exploitation of Poland's material and cultural goods was most likely not equal in history. The Pole was only expected to be able to compose and read and realize the master's orders. This truly happened, and there are inactive remnants of those who have experienced it personally. And today, Chancellor no longer Nazi, but de nomine or even de facto democratic Germany, without acquiescence, publically declares that the substance of compensation for this robbery and crimes is legally closed and, worse, the Prime Minister of the Polish Government – Donald Tusk – is nodding him.
So the question is whether any government of Poland, the President, the Prime Minister has the right to quit what belongs to the Nation? The Communists did as the ZSRS ordered. It speaks for itself. present the head of the Pilecki Institute – fortunately cancelled – was alternatively a man of the German side. Therefore, who, apart from the president of Poland, represents the interest of Poland internationally and in the European Union. If Chancellor Merz dreams of a neighbourhood with Russia, awkwardly and most likely inadvertently, returning to the partition of Poland in 1939, where is the government of Poland, to which the Nation entrusted its security?
possibly there's any large and mysterious politics in all this, but where's common sense? But he should be the basis of even the most average regular decisions, even those that find the safety of the state and nation?
Well, unfortunately, it is besides far more extensive. The war of Russia against Ukraine. Typical possessive, like the 1 in 1939, besides involving Russia. Conversations at the highest level are aimed at ending it, but it does not appear on the horizon. Moreover, Putin clearly mocks these efforts. Trump does a lot to end the war. But Żeleński came up with a proposal for a more specific, direct negotiation of Kiev – Moscow. he added: “that the force of the planet is needed to guarantee that Russia is ready to decision towards peace and to conduct critically crucial meetings for peace at the highest level." This force of the planet is more crucial than any sanctions, but the planet converts everything into profits and they decide how many die on both sides of each hour. The force of the world, this request may not be a large policy, guided by its criteria, but this force requires the safety of this world. It is besides a request of common sense. Many politicians find it hard to anticipate moral principles, but erstwhile they deficiency common sense, their actions become dangerous. After the German attack on Poland and the triumph of France, there were politicians who would like the war to end in a peace agreement with W. Britannia. Churchill definitely refused, though he was almost defenseless. He just knew that Hitler needed to take a breath and decision on. This was the position of a healthy mindset.
Common sense besides dictates decisions in matters not as crucial as war and peace. You know how a militant atheist Mrs. Nowack is. There is no deficiency of akin people in Tusk's government. But should they impose an enemy policy on the Church and religion? This is the fundamental question that arises in connection with the demands of the prohibition of confession for children or young people? The motivation of this Bolshevik ban on spiritual practices before the age of 18 – and it is claimed that it is essential to defend young people from the expected harmfulness of spiritual practices – is not only stupid (sit venia verbo), but besides injures human freedom. The point is that the Bolshevik government – present a model for a fighting democracy – ensured. That he protects man from the bondage that religion supposedly carries, while he imposes that bondage. Well, without getting into the problem of throwing religion out of school, which is simply a violation of concordat and constitutional principles, it should so encounter a legal barrier (of course not as Tusk understands it, but as the letter sounds), it is worth looking at the alleged wellness education program. This is not about health, and if so, it is mainly about pushing environmental heresy on children, the principles of wellness protection not so much by medicine recommended, but by modern shamans. An crucial issue in this education, is depraved children and young people to specified an degree that they accept as a norm the lesbian-homosexual order and its derivatives, that sexual hedonism replaces any moral norms, even those laity ones, due to the fact that that is what manipulation, making man a subject of experiment. With the sensitivity of the sexual sphere, the household is eliminated, like the natural habitat of life. Its city appears to be a partnership exchange of partners, or erstwhile a man so bored of its glorified paradise of delight, seeks a substitute in isolation from life and plunges into the nirvana of drugs. Not everyone will, of course, undergo this "health education", but that it has nothing to do with health, but instills in a man who is on his way to an independent and creative life his devaluation, it tells everyone not to be poisoned with the medicines of this "education, it is common sense. This is simply a essential attribute in all healthy family. so calling on Catholics to release children from this "health education" is simply a misunderstanding. After all, caring for a kid is simply a commitment of all parent. Not just religious. Therefore, if the parliament and government are not able or unwilling to defend the Polish kid from depravity, then parents, regardless of their ideology, are obliged to do so. due to parenting, which is simply a command for common sense. Ancient Principles, bonum faciendum malum vitandum (clive well, avoid evil) applies in all area of human action. That's why depravating a kid is simply a malum, and protection from it is summarized in a voucher. There's only 1 way out for a sensible man. surely not what the current Mimstra of Education and Education proposes to the child.
