Krzysztof Ciecióra, a PiS MP and erstwhile Deputy Minister of Agriculture, said on tv I proceed to believe that the solution to the fuel crisis is on the side of Orlen today. He pointed to PLN 900 million in profit for the company in retail sales in fresh weeks. For drivers, the bills at the stations and the integrity of the state giant are at stake.
Orlen under force after the words of the Chick
Krzysztof Ciecióra in program "Polish Point of Seeing" on tv Trwam he put the issue hard: today, Orlen has the tools to truly influence the fuel market. The PiS MP estimated that Donald Tusk's promises from the election run were propaganda, and the work for the price crisis had now moved to the state-owned company and ruling.
According to Ciecióra Orlen, he only made PLN 900 million in retail fuel in fresh weeks. It's a number that acts like a cold shower in political contention. If the state giant is to benefit from the crisis and the driver is to pay more on the distributor, then it is no longer a average marketplace game. This is starting to be a question of the sense of the national champion.
The driver pays the bill
The fuel dispute came back the minute the government tried to show reductions as its own success. DN has already described that fuels cheaper from 17 August They're expected to be a political consequence to the anger of drivers, but the bill for specified movements always stays somewhere. Either the price at the station, or the budget, or the finances of a company that is indirectly owned by citizens.
That's the point the chick hits. Orlen is not just a private company from the another end of the world. It is simply a strategical concern for the Polish economy, energy safety and everyday life of millions of families. If the retail margin grows during a time of tension, Poles have the right to ask whether the state defends the citizen, or simply obstructs itself with tables.
The State concern is to service Poland
National economical policy is not about the power holding a conference and then shifting work between ministries, Palace and companies. The State is required to monitor the infrastructure that determines transport prices, farmer work, business costs and household budgets. Fuel is not a luxury. It's a blood flow.
Therefore, the Orlen case has a broader dimension than the current organization brawl. It blew up before. dispute over fuel prices for Ukraine, later came the announcements of the shields and the passing of blame for the fuel donation. In specified chaos, the citizen sees 1 thing: the rulers are happy to talk about concern, but with the distributor he pays a circumstantial amount.
Tusk promised, Orlen earns
Donald Tusk in the run promised lower fuel prices. Today, his camp must answer a simpler question: who is liable for a situation where fuel is inactive a political tool alternatively than a unchangeable component of economical security? The calf points to Orlen, but the problem is besides on the side of state supervision.
If the state wants to have strategical companies, it must require them to be strategically responsible. We request a profit. Without investment, reserves and energy resilience Poland would be weaker. But the profit squeezed at a time of crisis from drivers' wallets cannot be presented as normal. It is simply a test for the government, Orlen and the full doctrine of managing national assets.
Source: Radio Maryja / tv Trwam.
Source: Radio Maryja
![Poles have revealed who they criticize most frequently in conversations with their loved ones. The consequence may come as a surprise [POLL]]()
