Magdalena Ziętek-Wielkomska and I are talking about the geopolitical earthquake, politics based on realities, global alliances, politics of Polish elites, ideologicalization of actions of the West and America as a product.
Magdalena Ziętek-Welomska
President of the Foundation investigation Institute Pro vita bona, deputy editor-in-chief of the technological diary “Pro Fide Rege et Lege” and editor-in-chief of the online monthly diary “Modern National Thought”. Publicist, author of dozens of technological publications, social activist. He deals with social control, cybernetics and philosophy. It promotes a friendly reasoning environment.
Margaret Jankowska:"Trump, Xi Jinping, Putin – what awaits us after the U.S. elections?" is the first of this year's debates 6th Geopolitical Forum (21-22.09) in Łódź, among others, with your participation.
Before the Forum begins, let us talk about these 3 empires: the United States, China and Russia. Their geopolitical prospects, common interests and activities.
The world's geopolitical chessboard, where something is constantly happening, is simply a very dynamic space. What qualities and skills are needed now for politicians, decision makers in the country? What does this situation require of them, and what do people expect?
Magdalena Ziętek-Welomska: As far as the Western planet is concerned, the basic skill that actual politicians should have is the ability to separate ideology from reality. The Polish sociocibernetist prof. Józef Kossecki distinguished cognitive motivations from ideological ones.
In my opinion, the Western planet is in a state of deep crisis. The origin of his defeat is the indistinguishability of what is real, real, from various kinds of ideological or even propaganda cripples. At the moment, the most urgent thing the West has to do, and all those who want to deal with liable politics, is to realize how much the reasoning of Western people is ideologicalized and by how much detached from reality. knowing how frequently people who want well in their subjective view – for example, they fight for democracy, for human rights – are only puppets in the hands of those who make ideology, and behind the facade of beautiful slogans hide very, very brutal interests.
In the public sphere, the Western planet has learned to think in terms of a real arrangement of forces, real interests, what is truly happening. The ideological cripple – democracy, human rights – is applied to everything without asking how it truly works.
The ideas themselves are as noble as possible and have large possible to service people. Only unfortunately, they are mostly façade. They are only and only a tool for circumstantial interest groups to be able to accomplish their objectives in specified a hidden way.
At the moment, the most crucial thing is to halt reasoning with ideological cripples and start looking at where we have problems, what opportunities we truly gotta solve them and how, what is needed for that. This is what life is about – solving certain problems based on the resources we have.
In conclusion, we must halt rocking in ideological clouds and stand firm on the ground. reconstruct skills, specified as counting, checking what resources are available and simply looking at what is possible, the costs involved.
There is never an perfect solution, there is always what the full classical doctrine taught – weighing arguments, rations, interests, seeking the optimal solution, but optimal in the context of what is realistically possible, not in the perfect world.
Can you give at least 1 example to illustrate this?
The most clear and at the same time controversial is the issue of Ukraine, which shows how much the Western planet is real. In order to win the war, you gotta have a certain amount of resources, a certain amount of weapons, a certain number of recruits, a certain amount of facilities. This is simply a simple bill, isn't it?
Of course, it cannot be said in advance that those who have more weapons must win automatically, due to the fact that we know from past cases of commanders who have made up for material shortcomings good strategy, tactics. But fundamentally 1 soldier can't beat a million-dollar army, that's an apparent power bill.
From an nonsubjective point of view Ukraine's peace talks would be the best solution, but most likely the right minute was missed and it's besides late for that. Russia was ready to talk at the beginning of this armed conflict, with each subsequent period Russia's interest in specified talks declined. We have confirmed information that Ukraine was besides ready for specified talks, but they were blocked by Western countries.
