"I want to turn over the damn table"

Sławomir Mentzen on X.

Part of the freedom community is profoundly convinced that our organization has left its postulates and has become an perfect gathering of people without views. This is evidently not true. In no case have I given up my beliefs.

I just said that you gotta respect your constituents, not insult them, behave in an acceptable way by these voters. Companies gotta take care of their customers due to the fact that they make 100% of their revenue. The parties must take care of the voters, due to the fact that it is the voters who cast 100% of the vote in the election.

This does not mean, of course, that it is essential to adjust your views to the expectations of voters. I have a very rich set of views that disgust me with quite a few people that might make it impossible for me to accomplish anything in politics. But I'm not going to change them due to that. I'm just going to maximize the chances of their entry into force by getting as many votes as possible.

Where do we, as an environment, find that these apparent statements are considered by any to be a betrayal of ideas? Professionalism, the desire to gain as many votes as possible, and thus gaining influence on Polish politics, are more crucial to me than cultivating quirks, controversy, addressing third-rate topics that have the primary power to gain publicity, at the expense of the election result.

Freedom, property, justice, arrogant and rich Poland are my ideas for which I joined the UPR 16 years ago. Insulting voters, believing all possible conspiracies, social mismatches were never those ideas.

To go to war, you gotta have tanks, soldiers, lots of money, and lots of skills. The same goes for politics. We request quite a few people, money and skills. Where is all this if it's been so good for years?

After 30 years of work, any proceed to be arrogant of being amateurs, without people, money and skills. But they have an idea, which proves it due to the fact that they can call individual they don't like.

When I hear that we should not care about the voices of women, people who are moderate, waiting for real solutions, curious in occasional and superficial politics, but we should strive for the voices of fans of the planet Nibiru, that makes me twist.

When I see this competition on Twitter, who will prove to be more radical, more unsuited to society, to norms and to people's expectations, it besides makes me twist.

Such people are evidently very needed, but not in the political party. The buffalo man was useful to Trump, but would not aid him if he became an crucial Republican organization activist.

We request to be clear, we request to be different from competition. all developing company has to do the same. But you can be expressive in a million ways, including most likely 100,000 ways acceptable to voters. You gotta think differently, you should be a small crazy to take on specified a hard task as the influence on power in Poland. But you besides should be able to reflect on your results and methods. You can't lose for years, you can't see people everywhere, you can't see them.

This is basic. Recognising that if I'm not doing it, that means I'm doing something wrong, not that all the evil forces of this planet have sworn against me. If the company loses its customers, it has to look for guilt in itself. Does it have a good product, does it advertise it well, how well its processes work, or does it have the right employees? These clients are leaving for a reason. We request to diagnose that reason and then fix it.

However, if the company considers that the problem is only that the customers are besides stupid and the competitors have set up a secret plot, there will never be any improvement.

For 30 years, we've been doing the same thing, and then we're amazed the score is the same as always. We gotta effort differently, otherwise in the next 30 years we will inactive be tense that voters are stupid and taxes are high.

I believe that by tolerating people who have besides loose a relation with reality, we lose much more than we gain. To offend possible voters, we lose more than we gain. Focusing on highly eccentric postulates, and wrongful ones, and for most...

I believe that by tolerating people who have besides loose a relation with reality, we lose much more than we gain. To offend possible voters, we lose more than we gain. Focusing on highly eccentric postulates, and wrongful ones, and for most people even disgusting, we besides lose more than we gain.

I will be very determined and consistent on the issues I have raised here. I will decision our organization to these tracks, regardless of the level of discontent among some, due to the fact that I firmly believe that this is the only right way. If anyone has a problem with that, good luck elsewhere. In our party, the direction has already been chosen and as long as I have something to say about it, no 1 and nothing will change that direction.

I'm absolutely not curious in acting in a organization with trace support that will never affect reality. It's a waste of surviving on the sidelines and commenting on what individual else is doing. In fact, I believe hiding in a small, safe niche, the deficiency of the will to sail to the large ocean, is simply a manifestation of cowardice, deficiency of imagination and attachment to comfort. Who doesn't hazard it then rules nothing but his small cave.

I want out of this cave. I want to go for a golden fleece, swim between Scylla and Habrida, knock out the eye of the Cyclops, yet turn over this damn table, make Poland truly arrogant and rich.

If you want the same thing, you want to have a large adventure, join us. It will be highly difficult, you will gotta defeat many opponents, but I think it is worth a try.

It's a waste of life for easier challenges.