Data centralization is 1 of the top myths of modern digitization. We are told that in order for the doctor in the infirmary to know what we had 5 years ago in the another side of the country, the state must keep our full medical past in 1 giant, central bag.
In computer science, this approach has a circumstantial name: Single Point of Failure. 1 leak from the central registry means a disaster for millions of citizens at once. And that's what happened.
The alternate is simply a model of distributed and national architecture, based on a simple principle: data stays where it originated and access follows the patient. This could work like this:
Local databases
Every hospital, clinic or laboratory only stores their patients' data. If a hacker attacks a tiny clinic, the hazard involves a fraction of the population's radius, not the full state's.
Common communication protocol
The facilities do not connect to 1 data-gathering unit, but can communicate with each another according to a uniform, safe standard (e.g. via encrypted API access and approval system).
Digital key in the hands of the patient
The patient, utilizing an application, a digital identity wallet or an authorization code, decides who and for how long he can review his history.
Temporary on-demand access
When he goes to a fresh doctor, he authorizes him. His computer asks the systems of the facilities where he was previously treated, retrieves the essential entries consecutive from the origin and displays them on the screen. After the visit is completed or the consent expires, the insight disappears.
In specified a model no central silo is created, no 1 at ministerial level has access to mass wellness profiles and the flow of information is immediate and precise. The real digital sovereignty is that the patient manages the rights to his data alternatively than depositing it in the central machine.
The State is completely unnecessary for this. specified systems do not be now, due to the fact that this country dramatically impedes and builds central databases, so many medical institutions do not see the request to make safe standards of data access, but adapts to central databases of the state.
Grzegorz GPS Swiderski
]]>Twitter.com/gps65]]>
]]>t.me/CanalBlogeraGPS]]>
