The fact that the Holownia has pushed itself in front of a full immense cape of alleged politicians, and in fact people who have pushed themselves into power and do not know what to do with it, so they are simply chasing and pounding on the necks of opponents, especially those who have done something for Poland before them, and what they just did. If I were like Tusk or Giertych, not to mention Bodnar, I would do the same. A man, unfortunately, is flawed and so easy to lure him.
We underestimated the hoard. I underestimated the front row. He fooled everyone, with his nonchalance, with his donquitty, sometimes his cabaret way of being. He was given the marshalry of the Sejm in the belief that with it everything could be done, much more than Kosiniak-Kamish and the Black 1 who wielded the remnant of the decaying left.
History plays tricks. For Holownia and Tuska, the time of trial came on 1 June 2025 erstwhile Karol Nawrocki, not Rafał Trzaskowski, was elected president of Poland. There's a panic. It is known which animal picks out another bites erstwhile it sees confusion among a flock – hyena.
This time it is Roman Gierty, who already 5 days after the election submits his accession to the PO. His arrogance, diabolical pride and assurance gave him assurance that he could not only save but subject himself to a rotting left-liberal strategy that erstwhile fought for himself. This is what he said shortly after his accession: civilian Coalition "has a plan to win." Poland is in good hands, Tusk is the champion of winning elections. It's specified a inexpensive flattery, like telling a woman to be 60, that she has a chance at a Miss Europe contest. He who understands Giertych's perverse language knows 1 thing: he wants to put Tusk to sleep, considers him a loser in Poland and Brussels and will easy sit in his chair. And the plan for the triumph is simply a coup and the entry into power of Poland through Holovnia, which will refresh Targowice and the cities of the will of the Nation will hand over the country to the fresh Catherine, or Giertych and possibly occasional company. Occasional due to the fact that the honest alliances of Gierty do not admit themselves as FÜHRERA of all time.
Who could have guessed the Hollow would have won? specified a Hołównia – homo novissimus? I'm not trying to figure out what made him feel better. Presumably, it's political reasoning and aversion to complicity in nasty bastardity, in fraud without equal. Gierty could, set Tusk to vertical. After a successful coup, Holovnia realized that he would go into the shadows and forgetfulness, or possibly even face any brass committee. I think that's important. After all, assaulting him for gathering with the opposition? Does this mean that the talker of the Sejm is absolutely to perceive to only 1 side of the Sejm Hall? They got the incorrect place. It would work on Tomczyk, Witczak, but not on the Hołownia, which may have put together a not-so-coherent party, but he sees himself in politics rather seriously. What Jacek Gądek writes that in The coalitions are sick of Holowna. Ego soaking him full planet jest repetition of those to whom Holovnia got under his skin, due to the fact that it turned out that the function of a puppet was not adequate for him. The fact about him is different, possibly not as he drew it out, but his fact more convincing than beating his sponsors to date. About his gathering with Kaczyński he says: I realize the anger of the electorate and the media, the Civic Platform. A large part of the identity of this environment - I say this, without judging - is mainly integrated by the attitude of extremist confrontation with the PiS camp. Talking to individual on the another side of the barricade is for them to transcend the boundaries of the existential enemy, betrayal. I in the PiS see a political opponent who should be accounted for out of the evil done, not ready to take extremist steps forward, inactive reasoning that all I request to do is play an old song that we interrupted in 2023 and it will be the right one. It won't be. I think so. I can't hate, though. I'm not good at contempt. I can't turn my back, I can't not shake my hand. This may be a disadvantage, but another will not and will not be.”
One could without hesitation sign after many of these sentences, but Holovnia would gotta explain how he understood the following sentence: I in the Law and Justice see a political opponent who should be accounted for out of the evil done, not ready to take extremist steps ahead. What does it mean to settle a wrong? precisely what evil? Since after 15 XII 2023, erstwhile the Holownia entered the circles of power, the country flourishing under the Law and Justice, is almost ruined? And 1 more thing: what is this inability to take extremist steps forward? The lobby can talk in politics due to the fact that it turns out that it does not deficiency common sense. However, he must step distant from operating with generals and get on the road of specifics. He could not get this in the Alliance, due to the fact that there is simply a fashion for slogans and fighting – hence a fighting democracy – with all those who disagree. It didn't work out for anyone, Napoleon or Hitler, why would it work for Tusk and Gierty?
