Fundamental concepts, frequently abused in circulation language, but seldom understood as defined. The evidence is an example of Grechuta's engagement as a lyricist and vocalist in social issues. And these stay valid.
Freedom is not a value which in Poland is understood in depth. Freedom is simply a useful slogan, declinated in organization manifestos and political oration. fewer realize the meaning of this value and the weight of the obligations that consequence from it on the free. The freeman is present in the language of political debate individual who denies the meaning of this concept. The Liberals are Karol Nawrocki, Mentzen, Korwin-Mikke and Braun to scope the post-election census by nature. A squad that clearly shows that it does not realize the hard term. For Nawrocki, let us say, freedom is avoiding obligations towards the state, specifically – negating compulsory vaccinations. Nawrocki tells the vaccines: – No! No! It limits the freedom of a Pole! The same kind of freedomist patriot for many years personified Korwin-Mikke, not agreeing to another state compulsion, which was the request to fasten safety belts while driving. present Mentzen is considered a leading freeman, who determined support in the 2nd circular of the presidential run from the candidate's decision to limit access to arms for Poles. The absurdities of specified attitudes, apart from exposing the foolishness of their representatives, point to the ignorance of parts of society that support those mentioned in each election. And the scale of the nonsense of specified an knowing of freedom is best understood by doctors who are dubious, but regular “suck” of saving from the death of freedomists in need. After a road accident or as a consequence of complications after an infection on a abroad holiday. Alistin's uncontested attitude of freedomists is easy to modify, as their terms can be accepted, but after signing them a contract that by their own means they will cover the harm resulting from their knowing of freedom. You want to drive without a seat belt? You don't want to get vaccinated? Would you feel better hiding a loaded beretta in your tracksuit? No problem! You want it, you got it! But on my own. And there is still, unfortunately, no better illustration for Tischner's thesis of the cursed gift of freedom, like examples of these just any people knowing freedom anyhow.
A long time ago, I heard the announcement that the state, trying to solve the housing issue, would loosen the safety of freedom and let – pensioners, pensioners, age people en général – to pass through the road at red light, and will not prohibit them from bathing in prohibited places. The schchar mentally corresponds to Nawrocki's intellectual level, Mentzen, Mikke, Braun.
If you follow the line of above reasoning (?), you would anticipate that here car manufacturers will lobby for changes in the road code to increase the velocity limits with which you can decision on the roads. Why limit freedom to those who want to step harder? And if a freeman wants to step on his feet more strongly, and that he is just coming back from the bar, why not go out against his natural right to free driving and not rise the limit of alcohol level from 0.2 to – and why not? – to 0.8 promil? Let him have the peasant, let him feel free, he's due! Would that not bring police work and reduce its effectiveness in fighting drunkards? And that sounds like a joke, like the police are already in this field effective...
And from another story... Could supermarkets not freely set expiry dates for products on which the wellness and life of consumers depends? There's free trade, why complicate it? And that's what Nawrocks want, Mentzen, Mikke, and the remainder of the free show. Does that make sense? precisely the same as everyone's unlimited right to arms.
Freedom in politics... Who could forbid president Nawrock from being head of the large Bu National safety Bureau, his peculiar friend from the Tricity? Who could forbid Kaczyński to appoint Janusz Kowalski as future Prime Minister of the Government of the Republic? Nobody! due to the fact that limiting freedom is for the national right hand of Poland to renounce God, Homeland and Honor. It is to deny the inheritance from Grunwald and Monte Cassino. This negate the function of John Paul II. The point of nonsense comes from a sick knowing of what freedom is.
There is no point in calling here definitions, due to the fact that curious people do not gotta read them due to the fact that they know their own. No 1 can convince them, as old Kaczyński claims, that white is white and black is black. And there's no discussion! They're axioms! With them is like the fact of faith. You just gotta confess! Don't think and don't doubt. So I will quote to them Mark Grechuta's message, although without hope that anything to their confused, free minds will come, and even if it does, will it be understood?
And freedom is the kingdom of good words.
Wise thoughts, beautiful dreams
It's a belief in people.
