The PiS presented a draft amendment of the Constitution which allows for "the pursuit of Russian oligarchs", but a task will be voted to let "the pursuit of Polish dissidents". Technically, it's the same design.
Voilà!
Karl Marx He erstwhile said "History likes to repeat itself, erstwhile as a tragedy, and the another time as a farce". It is highly likely that on May 24 we will have specified a replay. Twenty-one years ago, 2 words were removed from the bill, which changed its meaning and scope of any key findings. Now the PiSs have removed 10 words from their own plan and besides changed half of the sentence, which caused the task to concern something another than the first version.
I am referring to the draft introduction to the Polish Constitution of the chapter "State safety threats". In the first project, applicants intended to introduce a evidence of the anticipation of confiscating assets to natural persons who are not nationals of the Republic of Poland, as well as to another legal persons and entities, erstwhile it is suspected that this property is utilized to aid armed assault in the territory of the Republic of Poland or an allied state. So speaking colloquially, it was about Russian politicians, oligarchs and companies who have business contacts with the authorities of their country and support an armed action.
Opinion of lawyers
The draft (Annex 1) was submitted to the Chief Bar Council for an opinion. There was the content of the draft revision of the Constitution, which was given an opinion: ‘...natural persons who are not Polish nationals, legal persons and another entities’ and ‘..public authorities of that country’.
The NRA has issued a negative opinion, considering that there is no request for these changes, as the current Constitution of the Republic of Poland allows for the introduction of specified solutions by average laws, without the request for amendment and the applicable provisions already apply, and the Republic of Poland has been applying them for a long time (18 years). So they demonstrated the senselessness and perniciousness of the changes to the Constitution, suggesting possible insignificant changes in the Criminal Code. However, the NRA confirmed the appropriateness of specified measures on the basis of existing legislation.
Words That Disappeared
However, on 24 May, Members will not vote on the draft opinioned by the Chief Bar Council, only the draft after correction (amendment 2). The deletion of these 10 words and the change of half of the conviction caused the task to concern something else. Without specifying that it is abroad entities who support their country in armed aggression. The project's evidence shows that it is simply a ‘bat’ for Polish citizens who have different views on our east policy than authoritative one. Because, according to mainstreamum, any criticism of our east policy is tantamount to supporting the activities of the Russian Federation, that is, being a “Russian onus” or “Russian” by the” – of course from a vending machine, without a court. The Monitoring Centre for Racist and Xenophobic behaviour is rooting for PiS and already on 20 May in its revolutionary frenzy announced that: “The government introduces a law allowing the collection of assets to Polish proputinovers”.
"As early as 24 May, during the next session of the Polish Parliament, Members will vote on the bill, which will let for the taking of assets to people who support force wars and aggressive regimes attacking Poland or our neighbours with whom we are friends. That means people like Krzysztof Tołwiński, Sikulski, Marcin Osadowski is Wojciech Olszański and thousands of members of the pro-Russian Fascist Organization Kamratia – could lose their homes, cars, homes and all another assets” - We read.
No court, no contacts.
“This is simply a very good tool to fight the Russian agent operating in Poland, who receives powerful money from Russians and Belarusians for diversion actions against the Polish State” – writes the centre. Indeed pure Stalinism to power.
The PiS evidently has hostile actions of Russian politicians or oligarchs. Law enforcement is mainly about disciplining its own citizens before the upcoming elections. On 24 May, Members will vote on a bill that was not given an opinion by the NRA, or on another draft, which is simply a legal curiosium. Members want to introduce into the Constitution a evidence on which Poles can be punished without proving guilt. Not even on the basis of the presumption of guilt, but on the basis of the presumption that the owner of the property has improper contacts, even in the individual sphere.
Alibi
De facto Members want to bring the Constitution into the function of "supercode of criminality" where average rules of law do not apply, and the only nonsubjective is to intimidate and punish citizens who have the nerve to think differently from the ruling party. If this were to be addressed for an opinion, the Chief Bar Council would not have left a dry thread on it. It would have submitted crushing criticism, both to effort to make the Constitution a "proscriptive decree-announcement hub" and to apply the law. utilizing the precipice that after the opinion, as a consequence of further legislative work, seemingly insignificant changes were made that actually changed the subject of the bill, the PiS gained 50% alibi, due to the fact that although the NRA did not support changes in the Constitution it supported the legitimacy of specified actions.
The problem is that the NRA has put forward an opinion on the task on "tracing Russian oligarchs" and MPs will vote on the task on "tracing Polish dissidents". The Law and Justice Office will most likely not push through these changes in the Constitution, which he knew from the beginning. However, this 50% alibi will be a capital for the future in creating easier-to-implement, smaller "legal monsters" that dissidents "savage". Already, the majority of Members do not know what the Chief Bar Council has expressed and what they will vote on. In a fewer months, everyone will be convinced that the NRA has given a advice "in principle" to the voted project, that is, from harassment of dissidents. In the close future, PiS can convince even opposition MPs that changes in law must be made to pacify "putinists", due to the fact that there is simply a advice "in principle". It won't be difficult, due to the fact that both mainstream, as well as his electorate, is mentally ready to introduce a strategy in Poland which will draw on the achievements of the dictator Sulla, Joseph Stalin or a senator Joseph McCarthy.
Cezary Michał Biernacki
Source: https://www.sejm.gov.pl/Sejm9.nsf/print.xsp?nr=3180
